>That makes things very difficult, unfortunately. Given those
>restrictions, I think your best bet is to have some sort of "check
>out" process when someone needs to read a file. At that point, the
>file is decrypted by the master key and then re-encrypted to that
>persons key. Your local policy
Received the warning message:
gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on configuration file
"/home/jason/.gnupg/gpg.conf"
after running gpg --version as root. I don't get the warning if I run the same
command as a regular user.
Here's the permissions on the file:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> ls -l .gnupg/gpg.c
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
How is signature level specification done in 1.4+?
--ask-cert-level
previously this was on by default. apparently it caused too much
confusion, so now you have to specify it if you want it.
--
...atom
_
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 12:18:03AM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
> Il /21 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 04:18:35PM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
> >
> >> 1) It seems that, when running a subprocess like a gpgkeys_*.exe, gpg.exe
> >> does not pass it t
Il /21 mar 2005/, *David Shaw* ha scritto:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 04:18:35PM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
>
>> 1) It seems that, when running a subprocess like a gpgkeys_*.exe, gpg.exe
>> does not pass it the environment variables. Most notably, it does not pass
>> the system %PATH%. Bot
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:52:07PM +0100, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
> How is signature level specification done in 1.4+?
By default, GnuPG does not prompt you for a signature level. If you
want to be prompted, use '--ask-cert-level'.
If you want to specify, but not be prompted each time, use
'
How is signature level specification done in 1.4+?
Alex
--
mors ab alto
0x46399138
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Well,
It would be nice to have a control to select the keyring location.
I keep my keys on a memory stick, so i'm not able to use your tool!
--esskar
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Fitzner
> Sent: Montag, 21. März 2005 23:19
>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 04:25:07PM -0600, Grimes, Dean wrote:
> >You mention that all data enters the central location encrypted, but is
> then decrypted ("for processing") and then re-encrypted.
>
> The processing script would most likely decrypt the file piping the output
> into the processing p
>You mention that all data enters the central location encrypted, but is
then decrypted ("for processing") and then re-encrypted.
The processing script would most likely decrypt the file piping the output
into the processing program. Once processing is complete, the script would
then mv/cp the alr
I've written a new Windows explorer extension front end for gpg. I know
that Timo has winfpse, and somewhere out there is gpgsx. But as I've
never been able to find gpgsx nor get winfpse to work, I figured I'd
take a stab at it. I've always wanted an excuse to write an Explorer
extension anyways
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 08:21:43AM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2005 9:50 pm, Jason Harris wrote:
> > New keyanalyze results are available at:
> >
> > http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/ka/2005-03-20/
>
> Jason, I've been meaning to ask you this for ages. In the analysis rep
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:32:51AM -0500, Jason Markley wrote:
> David,
>
>Sorry to bring this back up when it's supposed to be fixed, but with
> 1.4.1 I'm still having the same issue as before. Do you know what bug #
> it was specifically that was 'fixed'? Thanks.
I'm not sure if it ever
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:28:30PM -0600, Grimes, Dean wrote:
> Is this possible to do with GnuPG? It wise to do something like this? Is
> there anyone else besides me who has this situation or one similar? If so,
> how did you/they solve the problem? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
There
I have been searching the mail archives for a while but have not yet found
any discussion related to the situation I have. I'm new to GnuPG and data
encryption in general so if some of my ideas or thoughts go completely
against common sense then.
Anyway here is my situation. I have about 300 r
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 04:18:35PM +0100, Carlo Luciano Bianco wrote:
> 1) It seems that, when running a subprocess like a gpgkeys_*.exe, gpg.exe
> does not pass it the environment variables. Most notably, it does not pass
> the system %PATH%. Both gpg.exe and gpgkeys_*.exe depends on many dlls
>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:41:46PM -0500, Jason Harris wrote:
> As you seem to have concluded, that fact takes precedence in my
> logic, and as I have concluded, it seems to take no precedence in
> yours.
I can only conclude that we are talking completely past one another.
You do seem to be very
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 11:36:42PM -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 11:07:50PM -0500, Jason Harris wrote:
> > I really don't think it is worth trying to protect against these
> > scenarios. A user can simply remove any non-revocable sigs they
> > don't want in their local keyri
On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 01:12:33PM +0800, Zuxy wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Not until recently did I notice that I can trust any key ultimately,
> even those without secret part. Isn't ultimate trust expected to be
> assigned exclusively to my own keys?
Not necessarily. You can set ultimate trust to an
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Gerhard Siegesmund wrote:
Almost. :-) But this is the other way round. I want to call gpg from the
other server to decrypt something. I have the feeling, that it is not
possible to send something for decryption to another server. This would
have been a great feature. Imagine
Zuxy wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:00:41 -0700, David Vallier
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Recently I tried signing a file using winpt-0.9.90rc1 and right
>> after words I get a "box" popping up saying what? with 2 5-6
>> digit numbers sep
Hello Atom Smasher
> this seems to work for me:
> $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'cat file1' | gpg | ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] 'cat - >
> file2'
> note the quotes.
> it reads an encrypted file (file1) from the server, decrypts it locally
> and writes the decrypted data back to a file (file2) on the serve
On Sunday 20 March 2005 9:50 pm, Jason Harris wrote:
> New keyanalyze results are available at:
>
> http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/ka/2005-03-20/
Jason, I've been meaning to ask you this for ages. In the analysis report, at
the very tail, I get:
13 hops: 2
Farthest keys (13 hops):
5
On Sun Mar 20 2005; 20:00, David Vallier wrote:
> Recently I tried signing a file using winpt-0.9.90rc1 and right after
> words I get a "box" popping up saying what? with 2 5-6 digit numbers
> separated by a slash and what appears to be a progress bar below that,
Yes, this is a well known problem
24 matches
Mail list logo
