Just to also throw another option out there. Since we now have a REST
API we may even want to consider writing it in something else than C:
https://www.gtk.org/docs/language-bindings/index
Even if we write it in C, we may want to use the REST API, it would
theoretically make it easier to do gra
omething different entirely.
> >
>
> Why can't we use the proper GObject concept like other gnome application
> does? E.g. GNOME Settings, Nautilus, etc. which can handle the properties,
> and signals in a structured way.
>
> Thanks. Regards
>
> Gotam Gorabh
> ---
org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > gnunet-developers-requ...@gnu.org
> >
>
Hello,
Can you suggest to me some Issues or features to work on to get a better
understanding of the codebase?
Thanks and regards
Gotam
Hi,
first of all, this is the primary GSoC issue:
https://bugs.gnunet.org/view.php?id=5679
There are unfortunately no gnunet-gtk issues to point to I think.
This is the full list: https://bugs.gnunet.org/view_all_bug_page.php
But, I am not sure how many of those actually still apply.
Maybe l
On 28.02.2024 3:20, Jacki wrote:
But I assume it's also possible to use Cambalache already. Most
important functionality should work.
It's also possible to write UI files by hand instead of using Glade.
On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 20:58 +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote:
Let me just say this: usi
