s, in case there ever will be a
> release of a new AGPL version
> - GitHub belongs to Microsoft. Practically, next to Facebook, Google,
> and Twitter, Microsoft is an arm of the NSA by the NSA's PRISM
> program.
>
>
> Greetings,
> Bastian Schmidt
>
>
> --- U
ebook, Google, and
Twitter, Microsoft is an arm of the NSA by the NSA's PRISM program.
Greetings,
Bastian Schmidt
--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
Von: Christian Grothoff
Datum: 02.08.2018 19:07:05
An: gnunet-developers@gnu.org
Betreff: Re: [GNUnet-developers] New README.md and Github
&
I understand the position of Christian.
The README.md is good.
Le mer. 1 août 2018 à 16:42, Devan Carpenter a écrit :
> Hi everyone -
>
> As you can see, I've pushed a "markdown" formatted README to the repo.
> Please note this is not replacing the plaintext README file.
>
> My goal has been to
On 02.08.2018 14:58, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> GNOME is still a GNU project, right? Because they have a very active mirror
> account:
> https://github.com/GNOME
>
> Just as an example for GNU on Github.
Gnome is, in general, lax on the software freedom purity issue. It also
recently set up its own
https://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html#Freedom-for-Web-Pages is
very clear on this: "If you use a site other than www.gnu.org, please
make sure that the site runs on free software alone."
The server-side source-code for github is non-free and copyrighted by
Microsoft, so it's a no-go. I d
Schanzenbach, Martin transcribed 2.6K bytes:
>
> GNOME is actually a very good example for a project that has it's own and
> very good contribution guidelines (https://www.gnome.org/get-involved/).
>
> Btw just look at the FAQs of the Github page:
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Sysadmin/GitHub
> Pull
GNOME is actually a very good example for a project that has it's own and very
good contribution guidelines (https://www.gnome.org/get-involved/).
Btw just look at the FAQs of the Github page:
https://wiki.gnome.org/Sysadmin/GitHub
Pull requests -> No, Issues -> No
What is the point of github
GNOME is still a GNU project, right? Because they have a very active mirror
account:
https://github.com/GNOME
Just as an example for GNU on Github.
___
GNUnet-developers mailing list
GNUnet-developers@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnun
On 08/01/2018 06:23 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> Maybe
> instead of directly exposing the cgit first, we could have an
> intermediate page with details, readme, URLs.
That is what we are trying to do with the new HTML/J2 page (draft at
stage.gnunet.org): have a more friendly introduction page.
We s
On 08/01/2018 06:23 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> I just responded to an off-list message from Christian with an example of
> someone I study with. I think they are younger than I am, and have some
> but not too much experience with Free Software. Not a complete beginner.
> I had to point them to the
Florian Dold transcribed 14K bytes:
> I agree that we should not encourage or endorse using proprietary code
> hosting sites such as GitHub. I'm strongly against accepting contributions
> on GitHub. Even if the Gentoo project decided to do that, it remains a bad
> idea. The furthest we could go is
I agree that we should not encourage or endorse using proprietary code
hosting sites such as GitHub. I'm strongly against accepting contributions
on GitHub. Even if the Gentoo project decided to do that, it remains a bad
idea. The furthest we could go is have a read-only mirror with issues, pull
re
Hi Christian and Devan,
here's my take on this:
Christian Grothoff transcribed 4.8K bytes:
> Hi Devan,
>
> I don't quite see the point of the README.md: the existing README is
> perfectly readable for everybody, and having duplicate information is
> confusing (now one has to update two documents
Hi Devan,
I don't quite see the point of the README.md: the existing README is
perfectly readable for everybody, and having duplicate information is
confusing (now one has to update two documents, and users may wonder
which one they should read!). I'd prefer to focus on having one
document with g
14 matches
Mail list logo