Re: based GNUnet decentralized IP address, Abolish ipv4 and ipv6

addresses in the GNS system. However, there is also a ‘VPN record’ which IIUC can be used to communicate via CADET (which, IIUC, doesn't have all the right security and anonymity properties _yet_, but could have them in the future). Best regards, Maxime Devos. OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725E

Re: RFC 9498: The GNU Name System

e case, so mostly transparent, sure. But transparent, without qualifiers, I don't think so. Best regards, Maxime Devos OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Help needed with compilation

On 01-09-2022 13:20, Nirvin M wrote: Hello GNUnet developers, Not really a GNUnet developer myself, but ... I would like to contribute to GNUnet with the goal of making the UX easy. I'm trying to compile gnunet with the instructions here

Re: gnunet-go R5N

On 18-08-2022 15:10, Bernd Fix wrote: A new version (v0.1.32) of gnunet-go is availble at https://git.gnunet.org/gnunet-go.git that should be ready for integration tests. Some major and minor bugs have been fixed that have escaped attention before. A lot of code refactoring happened too... T

Re: Pushing to the repos

On 03-08-2022 20:02, Maxime Devos wrote: On 03-08-2022 19:47, Willow Liquorice wrote: Hello, Given that I'm getting repository access soon, I'm getting my changes ready to be pushed. I need to sign my commits, is that with the SSH key pair? Signing commits is done with GnuP

Re: Pushing to the repos

On 03-08-2022 19:47, Willow Liquorice wrote: Hello, Given that I'm getting repository access soon, I'm getting my changes ready to be pushed. I need to sign my commits, is that with the SSH key pair? Signing commits is done with GnuPG, telling git.gnunet.org that you are allowed to do stu

Re: New SSH key

On 26-07-2022 23:40, Christian Grothoff wrote: Done. In general, please send these types of requests directly to me or Martin, no need to bother the list. -Christian Thanks, and noted, I've pushed some new commits now. OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPG

New SSH key

Hi, I'll be using a new SSH key: 'ssh-ed25519 C3NzaC1lZDI1NTE5IPJa2FK5j9V6zkxVcvyvBQnt8dbXIXEABwO3rQZIhQ08'; the list of SSH keys for gnunet-scheme.git needs to be updated. Also, there is no description on https://git.gnunet.org, for gnunet-scheme maybe: GNUnet client implementatio

Re: Packaging problems

Martin Schanzenbach schreef op ma 06-06-2022 om 16:52 [+]: > > As Maxime says, GNUnet takes a long time to compile (when it > actually > > does - I'm having problems with that right now), and presumably > quite > > a > > while to test too. The obvious way to reduce those times is to > simply >

Re: Packaging problems

Willow Liquorice schreef op do 02-06-2022 om 14:44 [+0100]: > While I was working on the documentation, I decided to put a Repology > badge at the top level of the install page, and then I saw the extent of > GNUnet's packaging woes. There are more distros with severely outdated > versions than

Re: GNUnet Name System not working (as expected)

Tanguy LE CARROUR schreef op ma 11-04-2022 om 09:13 [+0200]: > Correct (again)! I activated UPNP on my box and the error disappeared. > But, I cannot do the same on my other computer because I have no control > over the "box" and cannot forward ports! > > Does this mean that I cannot use GNUnet on

Re: Building gnunet and gnunet-gtk from git on GUIX

Marcin Skrzypek schreef op zo 03-04-2022 om 17:25 [+]: > > (define-public gnunet-git >   (package >    (name "gnunet") >    (version "0.16.3") >    (source (local-file "/home/gnunet" #:recursive? #t)) >    (build-system gnu-build-system) >    (inputs >     `(("bluez" ,bluez) FWIW, this can pr

Re: Building gnunet and gnunet-gtk from git on GUIX

Marcin Skrzypek schreef op zo 03-04-2022 om 17:25 [+]: > To install GNUnet from git on GUIX I use modified (removed check > phase) package definition as tests fail: Which tests are failing? Maybe the bug can be fixed. Greetings, Maxime. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: Building gnunet and gnunet-gtk from git on Guix

Marcin Skrzypek schreef op zo 03-04-2022 om 17:25 [+]: >         ;;"--with-gnunet=/gnu/store/7hbk1a4f59zzp9rfav8xmxcfczb995s1- > gnunet-0.16.3/"  > ;;"--with-gnunet=/gnu/store/7hbk1a4f59zzp9rfav8xmxcfczb995s1-gnunet- > 0.16.3/include" If I'm not mistaken, due to reasons, you need the ungrafted

Re: Building gnunet and gnunet-gtk from git on GUIX

Marcin Skrzypek schreef op zo 03-04-2022 om 17:25 [+]: > To install GNUnet from git on GUIX I use modified (removed check > phase) package definition as tests fail: This does not answer your question, but it's named Guix, not GUIX. The reddit's name is a lie. Also, the standard way of disabl

Re: Attacking the documentation monster

William Liquorice schreef op di 01-03-2022 om 19:51 [+]: > Hello, > > A year or two ago, I tried to wrap my head around GNUnet so that I could > try to make parallel implementations of small bits in Rust, but found > its documentation to be utterly impenetrable. Not even from a technical >

Re: LSD0001 review

Schanzenbach, Martin schreef op do 10-02-2022 om 22:34 [+]: > While I understand the problem GNS defines strings to be UTF-8 > (notwithstanding punycode exceptions). > You can't have UTF-8 strings with a zero terminator without having it > mean exactly that: A string termination. > > Yes, you

Re: LSD0001 review

Schanzenbach, Martin schreef op do 10-02-2022 om 22:28 [+]: > What I mean is that you would not look at a nick like that and think > "I am going to add this to my zone". > The use of a NICK is not defined in a normative way. > There is no action associated with it that is qualified with a MUST

Re: LSD0001 review

Schanzenbach, Martin schreef op ma 07-02-2022 om 19:02 [+]: > > > LEGACY HOSTNAME > > >     A UTF-8 string (which is not 0-terminated) representing the > > > legacy hostname. > > > > What happens if it contaings \0, or ends with two dots, does that > mean > > the LEHO record is invalid and mus

Re: LSD0001 review

Schanzenbach, Martin schreef op ma 07-02-2022 om 19:02 [+]: > > > NICKNAME > > > > > >    A UTF-8 string (which is not 0-terminated) representing the > > > preferred label of the zone. This string MUST NOT include a "." > > > character. > > > > Can I have a nickname "SOME-ZTLD" > > Yes. > >

Re: LSD0001 review

Schanzenbach, Martin schreef op ma 07-02-2022 om 19:02 [+]: > > > LEGACY HOSTNAME > > >     A UTF-8 string (which is not 0-terminated) representing the > > > legacy hostname. > > > > What happens if it contaings \0, or ends with two dots, does that > mean > > the LEHO record is invalid and mus

Re: Using some GPL comments in GFDL documentation

Christian Grothoff schreef op ma 07-02-2022 om 13:59 [+0100]: > Yes, that's fine. -Christian Done, in commit 1f6ddc48151d5ad47389eb38b901f190c97c4f10. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

LSD0001 review

Hi, > Name > A name in GNS is a domain name as defined in [RFC8499] as an > ordered list of labels. The labels in a name are separated using the > character "." (dot). Names, like labels, are encoded in UTF-8. Does that mean, no punycode, unlike DNS? Does GNUnet's GNS<->DNS code handle punyc

LSD0004 call for reviews

> Block Storage > The Block Storage component is used to persist and manage data by > nodes. It includes logic for quotas, caching stragegies and data > validation. stagegies -> strategies > Responsible Peer: > The peer N that is responsible for a specific resource K, as > defined by the

Using some GPL comments in GFDL documentation

Hi, Some documentation I've been writing for Scheme-GNUnet (GNUnet- Scheme?) (GFDL1.3+, no invariant sections) is based on comments in src/include/gnunet_mq_lib.h, but that C header is GPL3+ licensed. Do I have permission to use it in the GFDL1.3+ documentation (see attachement)? More specifical

Re: Using GNUnet API for distributed database in an app

Prayank via Mailinglist for GNUnet developers schreef op wo 15-12-2021 om 06:35 [+0100]: > Is this the only documentation for APIs https://rest.gnunet.org/ ? Or > there are any other examples, tutorials etc.? Is there any project > which uses GNUnet API to achieve something similar? Any other > sug

Re: Pre-announcement of partial Scheme port of client libraries

Hi, Christian Grothoff schreef op wo 15-09-2021 om 16:12 [+0200]: > Yes, that would be desirable (also for your contributions), as that > could allow GNUnet e.V. to re-license/dual-license if ever required. > Note that the process is very simple (one signature), can be done under > a pseudonym (if

Re: Pre-announcement of partial Scheme port of client libraries

Schanzenbach, Martin schreef op wo 15-09-2021 om 14:26 [+]: > We should think about how to handle the confusion with the other repos. > I am not familiar with gnunet-guile(2), but from what you are writing it > appears as if we may want to consider deprecating and archiving those repos. > Maybe

Re: Pre-announcement of partial Scheme port of client libraries

Christian Grothoff schreef op wo 15-09-2021 om 16:12 [+0200]: > On 9/15/21 12:57 PM, Maxime Devos wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been porting parts of the client libraries of GNUnet to Guile (*) and > > changing a few things. It now has sufficient functionality for

Re: [bug#44199] [PATCH 0/1] An origin method for GNUnet FS URI's

[CC'd to Timothy Sample because of discussion of defining a new format for disarchive, and to gnunet-developers because of obvious reasons] A small status update! zimoun schreef op di 27-10-2020 om 14:39 [+0100]: > [...] > > The story about archives as tarball is a bit more complicated. The > m