Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello GNUnetters!
>
> FWIW, as an external observer, I would love to see more of the
> discussions around you take place on this list, be it high-level design
> discussions or patch review.
Fully agreed as another external observer! I also prefer using email as
it is te
I agreed, we should start dog-fooding as soon as it's ready: use
gnunet-conversation + multicast (!) instead of mumble. However this is
quite far-fetched (I'd say months), since multicast is far from done and
gnunet-conversation as it is right now is point-to-point only (disregarding
the current ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Seconded. It's important for the community to see how GNUnet is
evolving and how non-developers can help. For example, more people
knowing about the need to hire hackers means more coverage and more
candidates. Also, a more lively mailing list / c
On 01/10/2015 05:44 PM, Matthias Wachs wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 19:52 +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote:
>> I think it wouldn't hurt to have it rotate a bit between days, that way
>> it won't always be the same person with a conflict who can't make it.
>> So something like 8pm on the 2nd and 15
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 19:52 +0100, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> I think it wouldn't hurt to have it rotate a bit between days, that way
> it won't always be the same person with a conflict who can't make it.
> So something like 8pm on the 2nd and 15th of every month would give us
> bi-weekly, but ot
On Sat, 2015-01-10 at 15:02 +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello GNUnetters!
>
> FWIW, as an external observer, I would love to see more of the
> discussions around you take place on this list, be it high-level design
> discussions or patch review.
>
> I think the added transparency would be a b
Hello GNUnetters!
FWIW, as an external observer, I would love to see more of the
discussions around you take place on this list, be it high-level design
discussions or patch review.
I think the added transparency would be a bonus both for you who are
already involved in the process, and for lurke
