John Ralls writes:
> One could, but I agree that a “General” component is better, so I’ve made one.
>
> I think David’s 777893 belongs in the T&CG, though, and he’s already
> moved it there.
Sure, having a General component makes sense if you don't know where it
should go, but I think it would b
> On Aug 28, 2018, at 6:11 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> John Ralls writes:
>
>> One could, but I agree that a “General” component is better, so I’ve made
>> one.
>>
>> I think David’s 777893 belongs in the T&CG, though, and he’s already
>> moved it there.
>
> Sure, having a General componen
Am 28.08.2018 um 16:31 schrieb John Ralls:
>
>
>> On Aug 28, 2018, at 6:11 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>>
>> John Ralls writes:
>>
>>> One could, but I agree that a “General” component is better, so I’ve made
>>> one.
>>>
>>> I think David’s 777893 belongs in the T&CG, though, and he’s already
>>>