> On Aug 28, 2018, at 6:11 AM, Derek Atkins <warl...@mit.edu> wrote: > > John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> writes: > >> One could, but I agree that a “General” component is better, so I’ve made >> one. >> >> I think David’s 777893 belongs in the T&CG, though, and he’s already >> moved it there. > > Sure, having a General component makes sense if you don't know where it > should go, but I think it would be good to also use it for "umbrella" > bugs so that if there's a change that needs to be made in multiple > places we have a general bug and then doc-specific bugs. > > At least that strcuted seems to make sense to me. Unless you feel it's > too much overhead? > > We've used this structure before for major releases.
Yes, that’s a reasonable use case. We just have to remember to close the umbrella bug when the individual ones are all closed. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
