Re: OK to add swigified function to core-utils?

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Andreas Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Charles, > > > > Am Dienstag, den 01.04.2008, 13:01 -0700 schrieb Charles Day: > > > I have come up with a working fix for bug > > > 450354

Re: [PATCH] Python bindings (with much of the core api)

I have looked into trying to combine the existing Swig interface files and the python-bindings interface files. As far as I can tell there isn't a way to specify multiple language specific sections in a single interface file (someone please correct me if I'm missing something). The best bet might b

Auto-fill in registers: how does it work?

When manually entering new transactions in the register, how does the auto-fill capability work? Does it (a) just look at existing transactions, make a guess at a match, then copy the information? Or does it (b) draw that information from a bucket of "memorized transactions"? Quicken does the latt

Re: [PATCH] Python bindings (with much of the core api)

Jeff Green wrote: > The best bet might be to put the non-language specific stuff into a > separate file (it would mostly consist of common typedefs and function > declarations) and have the language specific interface files %include > that file. > I think doing it this way would work well, I'm jus