On Fri, 06 Apr 2001 13:50:18 PDT, the world broke into rejoicing as
Charlton Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Christian Stimming wrote:
>
> > Once again we had the question whether it makes sense at all to have
> > accounts with children in the hierarchy (non-leaf accounts) w
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Once again we had the question whether it makes sense at all to have
> accounts with children in the hierarchy (non-leaf accounts) with
> transactions in them. ... But in the long run we should consider
> adding a flag to the account structure whe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > -Original Message-
> > Once again we had the question whether it makes sense at all to have
> > accounts with children in the hierarchy (non-leaf accounts) with
> > transactions in them. goonie and I strongly vote for NO.
On Thursday 05 April 2001
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
The "Include Subaccount's balances" report option is confusing and/or
doesn't do what we want. The implementation of this in
gnc:html-build-acct-tree as well. We'll change that, and this is what we
discussed tonight.
Once again we had the question whether it
