-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Once again we had the question whether it makes sense at all to have
> > accounts with children in the hierarchy (non-leaf accounts) with
> > transactions in them. goonie and I strongly vote for NO.
On Thursday 05 April 2001 16:48, Phillip Shelton wrote:
> Where should my A/P and A/R go then? At the moment I have them as the
> children of the account that the money will go into or come from when
> the transaction of the cash finally happens. This gives me, in the main
> window, a total for the account of available funds for the accounts with
> A/P accounts as I have promised and yet still allows me to have the
> parent reflect what the bank thinks happened.
Interesting configuration you are describing there. 1. This is so far only
goonie's and my opinion. 2. Our proposal would still leave the option to
continue as right now. 3. In my account hierarchy the A/P and A/R are in
totally different places. For A/R transaction which eventually end up in
Assets:Cash I would have an account Assets:A/R:CashToReceive. But that's
just how I do it and gnucash offers you a whole variety of even different
ways to handle the account hierarchy.
Christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBOs1LoWXAi+BfhivFAQHqSAP+LQ7H8KjgOIVykLeRCIZUX/cNdph0Nnwm
W6tJNR3lcCGwttEuitR0FFS6QeQH/iNW0inIZOrF5Ue4vIkhD34R+gVQWas7eRoL
dKISdy397vHGiWYxuu74c2KRs4Vbqq5ukrmKTvQCu887cHJb15rLMzvpqJzBHwF0
tX4gtKbQI3I=
=oKQw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
