> On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 11:23:35AM -0800, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> >
> > CVS will just update the new stuff. If you can't get the patch to work,
> > you can go ahead and just compile CVS. The patch is not necessary.
>
>
> Ah good.
> I just wanted to ask why this patch isn't fed into CVS...
>
It sounds like your mailer is messing with the message... What
mailer are you using?
-derek
David Bobroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hello again,
>
> I still have not gotten that patch file uudecoded. I tried Jan-Ewe Finck's
> suggestion:
>
> uudecode < filename
>
> ...but still got
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 11:23:35AM -0800, Dave Peticolas wrote:
>
> CVS will just update the new stuff. If you can't get the patch to work,
> you can go ahead and just compile CVS. The patch is not necessary.
Ah good.
I just wanted to ask why this patch isn't fed into CVS...
If theres somethin
> Hello again,
>
> I still have not gotten that patch file uudecoded. I tried Jan-Ewe Finck's
> suggestion:
>
> uudecode < filename
>
> ...but still got a 'no end line' message. Once again, if I don't remove at
> least one leading space from the 'begin' line I get an error message about
> not
Hello again,
I still have not gotten that patch file uudecoded. I tried Jan-Ewe Finck's
suggestion:
uudecode < filename
...but still got a 'no end line' message. Once again, if I don't remove at
least one leading space from the 'begin' line I get an error message about
not having a 'begin' li
