Christian Stimming wrote:
I'm sorry, but the last part is some FUD that doesn't need to be redistributed
any further. The KDE project explicitly states that already very early into
the migration to cmake, it built on more platforms than it ever did with
autotools.
What kind of adoption does
Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2007 20:32 schrieb Graham Leggett:
> Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> The whole point of cmake is that it will perform all those
> >> platform-checks (more precisely: host and target checks) which used to
> >> be done by the autoconf-generated shell scri
Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The whole point of cmake is that it will perform all those platform-checks
(more precisely: host and target checks) which used to be done by the
autoconf-generated shell scripts which nobody was able to understand. But the
price for this is that c
Hi,
On Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2007, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> What do you mean by "nobody was able to understand"? The configure
> script is mostly Shell script with a bunch of m4 convenience macros to
> implement pieces of shell script over and
Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The whole point of cmake is that it will perform all those platform-checks
> (more precisely: host and target checks) which used to be done by the
> autoconf-generated shell scripts which nobody was able to understand. But the
> price for this is
Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2007 08:28 schrieb Andreas Köhler:
> > >> (Actually, CMake might be an interesting alternative, especially
> > >> because we do
> > >> not use many "convenience libraries" but instead directly build a
> > >> whole bunch
> > >> of shared libraries.
> > >
> > > I just wante
Hi,
Am Montag, den 10.12.2007, 18:39 -0500 schrieb Derek Atkins:
> Quoting Andreas Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> (Actually, CMake might be an interesting alternative, especially
> >> because we do
> >> not use many "convenience libraries" but instead directly build a
> >> whole bunch
> >> of
Quoting Andreas Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Christian,
>
>> On the other hand, all the autotools are *so* web1.0, we shouldn't
>> bother any
>> more than necessary, which is what your patch did correctly.
>>
>> (Actually, CMake might be an interesting alternative, especially
>> because we d
Hi Christian,
> On the other hand, all the autotools are *so* web1.0, we shouldn't bother any
> more than necessary, which is what your patch did correctly.
>
> (Actually, CMake might be an interesting alternative, especially because we
> do
> not use many "convenience libraries" but instead d
Am Sonntag, 9. Dezember 2007 02:26 schrieb Andreas Köhler:
> Author: andi5
> Date: 2007-12-08 20:26:03 -0500 (Sat, 08 Dec 2007)
> New Revision: 16624
> Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/16624
>
> Removed:
>gnucash/trunk/m4/
> Modified:
>gnucash/trunk/Makefile.am
> Log:
> Remove th
10 matches
Mail list logo
