Hi Christian,

> On the other hand, all the autotools are *so* web1.0, we shouldn't bother any 
> more than necessary, which is what your patch did correctly.
> 
> (Actually, CMake might be an interesting alternative, especially because we 
> do 
> not use many "convenience libraries" but instead directly build a whole bunch 
> of shared libraries. I've been using cmake in several other projects for 
> quite some time by now. But switching the build system from autotools to 
> cmake this would be a task of the size of one Summer of Code project :-)

I just wanted to tell you that I am working on that now, in case anyone
started as well :-)

-- andi5


_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Reply via email to