Quoting Pierre-Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm beginning the French translation of Gnucash's help, and have been
suggested that it would be a good move to look into converting
gnucash-help to gnome-doc-utils [1].
>>
>> Without having looked too much into g-d-u details I'd *strongly*
As a GNOME translator, I can say translating documentation with PO
files is _much_ better than editing XML files.
I agree PO files are much more handy when translating user interface,
but editing XML files isn't any better. The translation tools (or
vim/emacs/etc. po-mode) allow us to focus on the
Christian Stimming a écrit :
> Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 16:16 schrieb Josh Sled:
>
>> Pierre-Antoine Lacaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I'm beginning the French translation of Gnucash's help, and have been
>>> suggested that it would be a good move to look into converting
>>> gnuc
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 16:16 schrieb Josh Sled:
> Pierre-Antoine Lacaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm beginning the French translation of Gnucash's help, and have been
> > suggested that it would be a good move to look into converting
> > gnucash-help to gnome-doc-utils [1]. g-d-u is sup
Pierre-Antoine Lacaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm beginning the French translation of Gnucash's help, and have been
> suggested that it would be a good move to look into converting
> gnucash-help to gnome-doc-utils [1]. g-d-u is supposedly the preferred
> way for documentation handling, and m
Hi,
I'm beginning the French translation of Gnucash's help, and have been
suggested that it would be a good move to look into converting
gnucash-help to gnome-doc-utils [1]. g-d-u is supposedly the preferred
way for documentation handling, and make use of po files.
I more or less ported it alread
