Pierre-Antoine Lacaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm beginning the French translation of Gnucash's help, and have been > suggested that it would be a good move to look into converting > gnucash-help to gnome-doc-utils [1]. g-d-u is supposedly the preferred > way for documentation handling, and make use of po files. > > I more or less ported it already, and would like to know if there is a > compelling reason not to move over. > > I fear myself with po files the lack of flexibility required in highly > technical, country-specific documentation.
For a bit more color, you and I discussed this on IRC [1], though the other day you came back and seemed to indicate that it didn't work out so well [2]. So, is that a compelling reason to not move over? In any case, can you please post a patch against the gnucash-docs sources that "implements" gnome-doc-utils? [1] http://lists.gnucash.org/logs/2007-07-02.html#T16:29:51 [2] http://lists.gnucash.org/logs/2007-07-03.html#T14:35:27 -- ...jsled http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp2lJbrInCEu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
