Re: SVN switchover maybe TONIGHT (before Nov 6th) [WAS: Re: CVS locked down]

2005-11-02 Thread Josh Sled
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 02:21 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > Considering the hour and pains experienced, let us consider the > subversion repository both authoritative and experimental for the next > 12 hours or so... until tomorrow afternoon (~2pm) at least. > > Checkout ... build... enjoy. Shout if th

Re: SVN switchover maybe TONIGHT (before Nov 6th) [WAS: Re: CVS locked down]

2005-11-02 Thread Conrad Canterford
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 02:21 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > The repository ... after some difficulty ... has been migrated, and is > available at the aforementioned locations. > ...jsled Thanks Josh! Conrad. ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnuca

Re: SVN switchover maybe TONIGHT (before Nov 6th) [WAS: Re: CVS locked down]

2005-11-01 Thread Josh Sled
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 19:20 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > Assuming that the merge goes smoothly, we're going to take advantage of > the tree already being closed and just get this over and done with ... > as such, I'm planning on doing the svn re-migration tonight. It'll take > a couple of hours after

SVN switchover maybe TONIGHT (before Nov 6th) [WAS: Re: CVS locked down]

2005-11-01 Thread Josh Sled
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 18:11 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > At this point in time, all CVS commit access has been locked out > so David and perform the g2->head collapse. After the collapse > I expect Josh to perform the CVS->SVN migration. Future commits > should happen in SVN. Mail will be sent o

Re: CVS, Oct 30, Build errors on x86_64

2005-10-31 Thread Neil Williams
On Monday 31 October 2005 8:00 pm, Derek Atkins wrote: > Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I still need to update configure.in to prompt for goffice if libgsf-1 >= > > 1.12.2 but it's best to get the G2 branch merged into HEAD and the change > > to SVN before I go tweaking configure.in

Re: CVS, Oct 30, Build errors on x86_64

2005-10-31 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I still need to update configure.in to prompt for goffice if libgsf-1 >= 1.12.2 but it's best to get the G2 branch merged into HEAD and the change to SVN before I go tweaking configure.in again. I see no reason this needs to wait. It's not a large ch

Re: CVS, Oct 30, Build errors on x86_64

2005-10-31 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Karl Hegbloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 09:00 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 23:36 -0800, Karl Hegbloom wrote: > I won't have time to try and fix these; I'm way behind on my Mathematics > homework and should really be working on that instead... > > Hope t

Re: CVS, Oct 30, Build errors on x86_64

2005-10-31 Thread Neil Williams
On Monday 31 October 2005 5:45 pm, Karl Hegbloom wrote: > > ...but the issue here isn't x86_64 specific: the GSF_CLASS_FULL macro > > errors in the lib/goffice/ code are due to a macro signature difference > > in <=libgsf-1.12.1 and >=libgsf-1.12.2. > > > > Neil Williams had put in a check re: libg

Re: CVS, Oct 30, Build errors on x86_64

2005-10-31 Thread Karl Hegbloom
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 09:00 -0500, Josh Sled wrote: > On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 23:36 -0800, Karl Hegbloom wrote: > > I won't have time to try and fix these; I'm way behind on my Mathematics > > homework and should really be working on that instead... > > > > Hope this helps. Do yous have an AMD64 to

Re: CVS, Oct 30, Build errors on x86_64

2005-10-31 Thread Josh Sled
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 23:36 -0800, Karl Hegbloom wrote: > I won't have time to try and fix these; I'm way behind on my Mathematics > homework and should really be working on that instead... > > Hope this helps. Do yous have an AMD64 to test compile on? Only vicariously through souls like yoursel

Re: CVS/SVK/etc.

2005-10-24 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:03:08PM -0400, Dan Widyono wrote: > > Is anyone proposing a specific re-implementation scenario? I can see a lot > of theorizing on both sides, but nobody saying "let's try it *this* way, with > commits looking like *this*, and patches would be submitted like *this*, an

Re: CVS automake fails on Fedora Core 3

2005-10-18 Thread Casey Cichon
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 05:14:31PM -0400 or thereabouts, Derek Atkins wrote: > Casey Cichon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > After updating to the current packages (libofx, gtkhtml and g-wrap) the > > compile seems to be working just fine under Fedora Core 3. > > I see no reason you should've ne

Re: CVS automake fails on Fedora Core 3

2005-10-18 Thread Derek Atkins
Casey Cichon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After updating to the current packages (libofx, gtkhtml and g-wrap) the > compile seems to be working just fine under Fedora Core 3. I see no reason you should've needed to update any of these packages from what's distributed with FC3. I've built all th

Re: CVS automake fails on Fedora Core 3

2005-10-18 Thread Casey Cichon
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:54:20AM -0400 or thereabouts, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:14:24AM -0500, Casey Cichon wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:24:04PM +0200 or thereabouts, Christian Stimming > > wrote: > > Running automake --gnu ... > > configure.in:1346: required

Re: CVS automake fails on Fedora Core 3

2005-10-18 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:13:23PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: > Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:14:24AM -0500, Casey Cichon wrote: > >>On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:24:04PM +0200 or thereabouts, Christian > >>Stimming wrote: > >>Running automake --gnu ..

Re: CVS automake fails on Fedora Core 3

2005-10-18 Thread Casey Cichon
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 11:54:20AM -0400 or thereabouts, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:14:24AM -0500, Casey Cichon wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:24:04PM +0200 or thereabouts, Christian Stimming > > wrote: > > Running automake --gnu ... > > configure.in:1346: required

Re: CVS automake fails on Fedora Core 3

2005-10-18 Thread Casey Cichon
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 05:47:11PM +0200 or thereabouts, Christian Stimming wrote: > Derek Atkins schrieb: > >Quoting Casey Cichon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >>macros/gnome-gdk-pixbuf.m4:12: warning: underquoted definition of > >>GNOME_CHECK_GDK_PIXBUF > >>aclocal:configure.in:56: warning: macro `

Re: CVS automake fails on Fedora Core 3

2005-10-18 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:14:24AM -0500, Casey Cichon wrote: On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:24:04PM +0200 or thereabouts, Christian Stimming wrote: Running automake --gnu ... configure.in:1346: required file `intl/Makefile.in' not found This is not

Re: CVS automake fails on Fedora Core 3

2005-10-18 Thread Christian Stimming
Derek Atkins schrieb: Quoting Casey Cichon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: macros/gnome-gdk-pixbuf.m4:12: warning: underquoted definition of GNOME_CHECK_GDK_PIXBUF aclocal:configure.in:56: warning: macro `AM_GNU_GETTEXT' not found in library aclocal:configure.in:843: warning: macro `AM_PATH_LIBGLADE' no

Re: CVS automake fails on Fedora Core 3

2005-10-18 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Casey Cichon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: macros/gnome-gdk-pixbuf.m4:12: warning: underquoted definition of GNOME_CHECK_GDK_PIXBUF aclocal:configure.in:56: warning: macro `AM_GNU_GETTEXT' not found in library aclocal:configure.in:843: warning: macro `AM_PATH_LIBGLADE' not found in library Runnin

Re: CVS automake fails on Fedora Core 3

2005-10-18 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:14:24AM -0500, Casey Cichon wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:24:04PM +0200 or thereabouts, Christian Stimming > wrote: > Running automake --gnu ... > configure.in:1346: required file `intl/Makefile.in' not found This is not good. This file isn't in the G2 branch, j

Re: CVS automake fails on Fedora Core 3

2005-10-18 Thread Casey Cichon
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 04:24:04PM +0200 or thereabouts, Christian Stimming wrote: > Hi, > > are your sure that this is an error that causes automake to fail? I get > that very same message every time I run automake, but it is only a > warning and automake completes successfully. If there is an

Re: CVS automake fails on Fedora Core 3

2005-10-18 Thread Derek Atkins
Quoting Casey Cichon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > /usr/share/automake-1.9/am/tags.am: ctags was already defined in condition > !GNC_CTAGS_FILE, which is included in condition TRUE ... > Makefile.am:116: ... `ctags' previously defined here > **Error**: automake failed. That's strange. I've been getti

Re: CVS automake fails on Fedora Core 3

2005-10-18 Thread Casey Cichon
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:24:04AM -0400 or thereabouts, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:07:25AM -0500, Casey Cichon wrote: > > > > I'm trying to use the CVS version. I get this message when trying to run > > autogen.sh > > > > /usr/share/automake-1.9/am/tags.am: ctags was al

Re: CVS automake fails on Fedora Core 3

2005-10-18 Thread Christian Stimming
Hi, are your sure that this is an error that causes automake to fail? I get that very same message every time I run automake, but it is only a warning and automake completes successfully. If there is an error, then it appeared in the lines before that. Please post at least 15-20 lines of cont

Re: CVS automake fails on Fedora Core 3

2005-10-18 Thread Chris Shoemaker
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 09:07:25AM -0500, Casey Cichon wrote: > > I'm trying to use the CVS version. I get this message when trying to run > autogen.sh > > /usr/share/automake-1.9/am/tags.am: ctags was already defined in condition > !GNC_CTAGS_FILE, which is included in condition TRUE ... > Make

Re: CVS HEAD - trying to fix

2004-11-09 Thread Derek Atkins
Hi, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > All these errors were found in CVS exported for 2004-08-18 - there is a > Changelog entry for Scrub.c dated 2004-07-20 so I'll investigate that. Note that Linas does not always update the ChangeLog when he commits files, so you might want to run "

Re: CVS HEAD - trying to fix

2004-11-08 Thread Neil Williams
On Monday 08 November 2004 5:21 pm, you wrote: > #1: > > Invoices are posted to the accounts with gnc_numeric_zero values, despite > > having an amount set in the entries. > > I wonder if this is due to Linas' new scrub code? This certainly > sounds like a bug in his scrub code. That's certainly

Re: CVS HEAD - trying to fix

2004-11-08 Thread Derek Atkins
Hi, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Few people use HEAD for much. I know I dont. > > So which branch do you use to test new code? That presupposes that I'm writing new code. ;) For me, it depends on the code that I'm writing. Some of it I write and test on HEAD, some on g2. Some

Re: CVS snapshots?

2004-08-30 Thread Linas Vepstas
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 07:10:55PM -0700, David Grant was heard to remark: > Is there CVS snapshots for gnucash? Tarballs nightly, or when > developers feel like it, etc... No. -- pub 1024D/01045933 2001-02-01 Linas Vepstas (Labas!) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key fingerprint = 8305 2521 6000 0B

Re: CVS build

2004-08-12 Thread Peter O'Gorman
Perry Smith wrote: I'm mid-stream of trying to compile the CVS source. I had 1.8.9 installed and working (with all the dependancies). The autogen.sh script stopped and said I need XML::Parser for perl. O.k. The cpan dialog stopped and said I need expat. My question is, should I keep track of

Re: CVS update: gnucash/po

2001-07-06 Thread Christian Stimming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Friday 06 July 2001 10:07, Robert Graham Merkel wrote: > Update of /home/cvs/cvsroot/gnucash/po > > Removed Files: > ChangeLog > Log Message: > Removed useless machine-generated po/ChangeLog, more doc updates, > and fixed ordering bug in transaction rep

Re: CVS update: gnucash/po

2001-07-06 Thread Dave Peticolas
On 06 Jul 2001 11:14:56 +0200, Christian Stimming wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > On Friday 06 July 2001 10:07, Robert Graham Merkel wrote: > > Update of /home/cvs/cvsroot/gnucash/po > > > > Removed Files: > > ChangeLog > > Log Message: > > Removed useless machine-generated po

Re: CVS update: gnucash/src/scm/report

2001-06-18 Thread Kevin Finn
Wow, this is a huge improvement! I see the development warning and the splash screen in about 5 seconds after startup, and then the account tree comes up in another 5 or so. At least for users with somewhat older hardware like I have, I think this will be a huge usability improvement. It w

Re: CVS update: gnucash/src/scm

2001-05-10 Thread Dave Peticolas
writes: > > There's a bug in the main window startup code: > If user tries to open a file that has a lock on it (e.g. because a > previous gnucash crash left the dangling lock), and then answers > 'no' to the 'do you want to break the lock' question, then no main > window shows up; but gnucash d

Re: CVS update: gnucash/src/scm

2001-05-10 Thread Linas Vepstas
There's a bug in the main window startup code: If user tries to open a file that has a lock on it (e.g. because a previous gnucash crash left the dangling lock), and then answers 'no' to the 'do you want to break the lock' question, then no main window shows up; but gnucash doesn't exit, and cann

Re: Fwd: Re: CVS access working

2001-04-22 Thread Christian Stimming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sunday 22 April 2001 09:41, Bill Gribble wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 09:21:21AM -0700, Christian Stimming wrote: > > Trow plans on a Guppi 0.35.4 release next weekend. > > Nonetheless, you need to put in a runtime check to see if the features > you need

Re: Fwd: Re: CVS access working

2001-04-22 Thread Bill Gribble
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 09:21:21AM -0700, Christian Stimming wrote: > Trow plans on a Guppi 0.35.4 release next weekend. Nonetheless, you need to put in a runtime check to see if the features you need are enabled. We can't require guppi-0.35.4 just to get stacked barcharts, but they should work

Fwd: Re: CVS access working

2001-04-22 Thread Christian Stimming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Trow plans on a Guppi 0.35.4 release next weekend. Christian - -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: CVS access working Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 15:42:25 -0400 From: Jon Trowbridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Christian Stimming <[EMAIL

Re: CVS problems

2001-04-16 Thread A.
On 16 Apr 2001 14:23:15 -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote: > Nathan "A." Smith writes: > > Just me again, > > > > I wanted to report a problem with well -- the reports. They crash on > > selection on my system. > > > > The following is what is reported: > > > > ERROR: ;required feature not supporte

Re: CVS problems

2001-04-16 Thread Dave Peticolas
Nathan "A." Smith writes: > Just me again, > > I wanted to report a problem with well -- the reports. They crash on > selection on my system. > > The following is what is reported: > > ERROR: ;required feature not supported: printf > gnucash: [W] "failure loading ""/usr/share/gnucash/scm/rep

Re: CVS update: gnucash/src/scm/report (fwd)

2001-03-27 Thread linas
It's been rumoured that Conrad Canterford said: > Would require a rethink of how things are set out on the register (and > possibly a significant rewrite,particularly for my more ambitious > suggestions). actually, shouldn't. Most of the actual register layout is specified in one file, which bas

Re: CVS update: gnucash/src/scm/report (fwd)

2001-03-27 Thread Conrad Canterford
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I was thinking the other day on how to implement an a/r a/p register. > One thing that the register needs is a per-transaction 'date due' > field. (yes, there are other possible sol'ns but bear with me). > Well, we could hard-wire the date-due field into a new account ty

Re: cvs

2001-02-16 Thread James LewisMoss
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:10:08 -0800, Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Dave> Hi all, due to ISP problems cvs will probably be down for the Dave> next several days (at least through Monday). After this is fixed I think it might be a good idea to setup cvsup access to the cvs tree.

Re: CVS down?

2001-02-16 Thread Derek Atkins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > Interruptible power supply. > > > > Last nights electrical storm turned the UPS off! I had to manually cycle > > it this morning. What good is a UPS if it turns itself off in a storm? > > Maybe your UPS believes in the foll

Re: CVS down?

2001-02-16 Thread rob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Interruptible power supply. > > Last nights electrical storm turned the UPS off! I had to manually cycle > it this morning. What good is a UPS if it turns itself off in a storm? Maybe your UPS believes in the following: He who fights and runs away, lives t

Re: CVS down?

2001-02-16 Thread linas
Interruptible power supply. Last nights electrical storm turned the UPS off! I had to manually cycle it this morning. What good is a UPS if it turns itself off in a storm? --linas It's been rumoured that Derek Atkins said: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Gribble) writes: > > > Yep, looks like

Re: CVS down?

2001-02-16 Thread Derek Atkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Gribble) writes: > Yep, looks like it. That machine is at linas' house so it will > probably get up and running about the time he does :) It's weird. The machine isn't even pinging now (it was last time I checked, before I sent out my mail). I get as far as access-dsl-

Re: CVS down?

2001-02-16 Thread Bill Gribble
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 11:36:16AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > It looks like cvs.gnucash.org isn't responding to pserver requests. Yep, looks like it. That machine is at linas' house so it will probably get up and running about the time he does :) b.g. ___

Re: cvs

2000-09-14 Thread Eric Hanchrow
> "Eric" == Eric Hanchrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Eric> GnuCash uses GNU Automake to handle the build process, so for most of Eric> -the details, see the generic instructions in INSTALL. Below we detail Eric> -the GnuCash specific bits. Eric> +the details, see the gener

Re: cvs

2000-09-14 Thread Eric Hanchrow
> "Dave" == Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dave> I have removed the automake and autoconf generated files from CVS. Dave> This means 'configure' and the 'Makefile.in' files. To generate these Dave> files, you should use the provided 'autogen.sh' script which accepts

Re: cvs access?

2000-07-12 Thread Dave Peticolas
Jan Schrage writes: > > --BI5RvnYi6R4T2M87 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hi everyone! > > Was one of the nameservers broken during the transition of domains ? I > cannot do a 'cvs update' at the momen

Re: cvs 2000-06-26

2000-06-27 Thread Rob Walker
> On Tue, 27 Jun 2000 23:13:04 -0500, Kevin Finn > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Kevin> Tip suggestion: Kevin> Type + in the Num field of the Kevin> register to fill in the next check number. Type - in the Num field of the register to fill in the previous check number. rob -- The cynics

Re: cvs 2000-06-26

2000-06-27 Thread Kevin Finn
Tip suggestion: Type + in the Num field of the register to fill in the next check number. Kevin On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, you wrote: > CVS has been updated. > > New Stuff (Development Branch): > > + Robert Graham Merkel's tip-of-the-day patch. We need tips! If there >was a tidbit of informa

Re: cvs 2000-06-26

2000-06-26 Thread Robert Graham Merkel
Roland Roberts writes: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > src/gnome/dialog-totd.c includes ; > what version of gnome is required to get this? It's not part of > redhat 6.1 > just comment out that line. It's just cruft that I forgot to take out before submitting the patch.

Re: cvs 2000-06-26

2000-06-26 Thread Roland Roberts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- src/gnome/dialog-totd.c includes ; what version of gnome is required to get this? It's not part of redhat 6.1 roland - -- PGP Key ID: 66 BC 3B CD Roland B. Roberts, PhDUnix Software Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cvs 2000-06-26

2000-06-26 Thread Rob Walker
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:42:11 -0700, Dave Peticolas > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Dave> + Robert Graham Merkel's tip-of-the-day patch. We need tips! If Dave> there was a tidbit of information you wish you had known when Dave> you started using GnuCash and/or started tracking your finances

Re: cvs 2000-05-23

2000-05-24 Thread Shimpei Yamashita
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 05:11:43PM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote: > > CVS has been updated. > > New Stuff: > > + The currency field in the account windows and the default currency >item in the preferences dialog is a combo box with a list of currencies >and descriptions. You can still ty

Re: cvs build problems.

2000-05-17 Thread Dave Peticolas
> > rob@biffhero-laptop:~/src/cvs/gnucash$ cvs -z3 update -Pd && nice ./configure > --prefix=/home/rob/compiled/ && nice make gnome && nice make install > > resulted in the following: > > rm obj/gnome/gnucash-item-edit.d.tmp > gcc -Wp,-MD,obj/gnome/gnucash-style.d.tmp -c -g -O2 -I/usr/X11R6/i

Re: cvs 2000-05-08

2000-05-15 Thread Rob Browning
Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > + Applied Rob Browning's patch to break out g-wrap. > >NOTE 1: Before you update, remove src/guile/gnucash.h >You can also delete lib/g-wrap, lib/g-wrap-install, >and lib/g-wrap.configure. Also, if you're using cvs -z

Re: cvs 2000-04-08

2000-05-12 Thread Dave Peticolas
> It's been rumoured that Dave Peticolas said: > > > > CVS has been updated. > > + Auto-check numbering now uses the last check # entered, not > >the highest number entered. > > ? > How does this work? I saw a long debate on this, but can't get > my version to do anything like this automat

Re: cvs 2000-04-08

2000-05-12 Thread linas
It's been rumoured that Dave Peticolas said: > > CVS has been updated. > + Auto-check numbering now uses the last check # entered, not >the highest number entered. ? How does this work? I saw a long debate on this, but can't get my version to do anything like this automatically. --linas

Re: cvs 2000-05-08

2000-05-09 Thread Herbert Thoma
Stanley Long wrote: > > I've been lurking here all of three days :-))) > ... but have attempted to install gnuCASH twice in the last six months. > > It seems my libeguile doesn't get recognized. AFAIK the rpm is build against guile-1.3 and SuSE comes with guile-1.3.4. Try --nodeps when installi

Re: cvs 2000-05-08

2000-05-09 Thread Stanley Long
I've been lurking here all of three days :-))) ... but have attempted to install gnuCASH twice in the last six months. It seems my libeguile doesn't get recognized. At Saturday's InstallFest here in Anchorage, there were three networking gurus trying to help me get an install (both rpm and compil

Re: cvs 2000-05-08

2000-05-09 Thread Stanley Long
I've been lurking here all of three days :-))) ... but have attempted to install gnuCASH twice in the last six months. Robert Graham Merkel wrote: > > Dave Peticolas writes: > > > > CVS has been updated. > > > > New Stuff: > > > > + Applied Rob Browning's patch to break out g-wrap. > > >

Re: cvs 2000-05-09

2000-05-09 Thread Derek Atkins
I don't like this.. When I'm testing GnuCash, I sometimes like to start up with an empty session.. I suppose I could always start with /dev/null... But that's annoying. Is there some way to specify an 'open empty'? -derek Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > CVS has been updated. >

Re: cvs 2000-05-01

2000-05-01 Thread Bryan Larsen
On Mon, 01 May 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote: > CVS has been updated. > > New Stuff: > > + Robert Graham Merkel's updated transaction patch. In the "double" format, it seems to be messed up. One should be greater than 0, the other less than 0, I presume! You have: (lambda (value) (

Re: Replacing previous price (Was: Re: cvs 2000-04-21)

2000-04-25 Thread Dave Peticolas
> According to Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > CVS has been updated. > > > > New Stuff: > > > > + Some work on gnc-prices to reflect the new query api. > >Also, if the price obtained is different from the last > >price, go ahead and record it, even if it's the same day. >

Replacing previous price (Was: Re: cvs 2000-04-21)

2000-04-25 Thread Hubert Figuiere
According to Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > CVS has been updated. > > New Stuff: > > + Some work on gnc-prices to reflect the new query api. >Also, if the price obtained is different from the last >price, go ahead and record it, even if it's the same day. Great. I did this my

Re: cvs 2000-04-14

2000-04-14 Thread Bryan Larsen
OK, this must be the update that broke the build for me. cvsgnucash update -Pd -D "14 apr 2000" works fine cvsgnucash update -Pd -A segfaults just before the main window should appear. The ouput from the screen is the same as normal. I get this message, but then again, I've always gotten

Re: cvs 2000-04-09

2000-04-10 Thread Dave Peticolas
> Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > + Renamed the function 'list-index' in srfi-1.r5rs.scm to 'list-index-pred > '. > >guile-1.3.4 defines another 'list-index' with a different interface and > >semantics. > > > >This was causing the problems with loading reports that

Re: cvs 2000-04-09

2000-04-10 Thread Rob Browning
Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > + Renamed the function 'list-index' in srfi-1.r5rs.scm to 'list-index-pred'. >guile-1.3.4 defines another 'list-index' with a different interface and >semantics. > >This was causing the problems with loading reports that Mauro Triulzi and

Re: cvs 2000-04-05

2000-04-06 Thread Dave Peticolas
> > The "place g-wrap-install in /" bug is back. Durn. What does ABSOLUTE_TOP_SRCDIR get configured to in Makefile.init? thanks, dave -- Gnucash Developer's List To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cvs 2000-04-05

2000-04-05 Thread Bryan Larsen
On Wed, 05 Apr 2000, you wrote: > CVS has been updated. > > New Stuff: > > + Removed eperl stuff including configure.in tests for eperl. >Because of some file removals, you will probably need to >do a 'make clean' to get rid of stale dependency info. > > The "place g-wrap-install in

Re: cvs 2000-04-02

2000-04-04 Thread Herbert Thoma
Dave Peticolas wrote: > + a patch to configure.in. Let me know if this >clears up the 'NONE/...' problems people have >been having. Yes, works again! Herbert. -- Herbert Thoma FhG-IIS A, Studio Department Am Weichselgarten3, 91058 Erlangen, Germany Phone: +49-9131-776-323 Fax: +49-9

Re: cvs 2000-04-02

2000-04-02 Thread Paul Fenwick
On Sun, Apr 02, 2000 at 05:10:52PM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote: > CVS has been updated. [snip] > + a patch to configure.in. Let me know if this >clears up the 'NONE/...' problems people have >been having. Just did a clean re-build and install, and it appears that the change has worked

Re: cvs 2000-03-24

2000-03-27 Thread Rob Walker
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 01:53:50 -0800, Dave Peticolas > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Dave> The num cell in the register now has accelerator keys. Press + Dave> or = to increment by 1 and - or _ to decrement by 1. For good Dave> measure, you can press ] or } to increment by 10 and [ or { to

Re: cvs 2000-03-24

2000-03-27 Thread Rob Walker
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:53:35 -0800, Dave Peticolas > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Dave> The num cell in the register now has accelerator keys. Press + Dave> or = to increment by 1 and - or _ to decrement by 1. For good Dave> measure, you can press ] or } to increment by 10 and [ or { to

Re: cvs 2000-03-24

2000-03-27 Thread Rob Walker
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:44:09 -0800, Dave Peticolas > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Dave> CVS has been updated. Dave> New Stuff: Dave> + Bill Gribble's updates to qif importing and check printing. Dave> + Jan-Uwe Finck's updated de.po file. Dave> + Fixed a problem with getting translate

Re: cvs 2000-03-24

2000-03-24 Thread Dave Peticolas
> > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:44:09 -0800, Dave Peticolas > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Dave> CVS has been updated. > > Dave> New Stuff: > > Dave> + Bill Gribble's updates to qif importing and check printing. > > Dave> + Jan-Uwe Finck's updated de.po file. > > Dave> + Fixed a prob

Re: cvs 2000-03-24

2000-03-24 Thread Dave Peticolas
> > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 01:53:50 -0800, Dave Peticolas > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Dave> The num cell in the register now has accelerator keys. Press + > Dave> or = to increment by 1 and - or _ to decrement by 1. For good > Dave> measure, you can press ] or } to increment by 10

Re: cvs 2000-03-22

2000-03-23 Thread Dave Peticolas
> > + Reorganization of configure.in. This may fix the FreeBSD configure > > problem that people were having with detecting gettext. Let me know. > > Thanks, I'll check it out as soon as I have a chance. > > I put together a port of 1.3.3 last night and figured out the > right way to work aro

Re: cvs 2000-03-22

2000-03-23 Thread Matthew Condell
> + Reorganization of configure.in. This may fix the FreeBSD configure > problem that people were having with detecting gettext. Let me know. Thanks, I'll check it out as soon as I have a chance. I put together a port of 1.3.3 last night and figured out the right way to work around the proble

Re: cvs 2000-03-06

2000-03-08 Thread Rob Walker
> On Wed, 08 Mar 2000 18:11:09 +0100, Herbert Thoma > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> bottom? Only for the times when we resize it down by hand? But if >> someone touches _any_ of the column widths, the entire register >> window will careen back to the big size again. Herbert> That's a p

Re: cvs 2000-03-06

2000-03-08 Thread Heath Martin
Herbert Thoma writes: > Rob Walker wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 08 Mar 2000 10:38:08 +0100, Herbert Thoma > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > Herbert> Rob Walker wrote: > > > > >> Does this mean that I think the register window should only shrink > > >> and not grow according

Re: cvs 2000-03-06

2000-03-08 Thread Herbert Thoma
Rob Walker wrote: > > > On Wed, 08 Mar 2000 10:38:08 +0100, Herbert Thoma > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Herbert> Rob Walker wrote: > > >> Does this mean that I think the register window should only shrink > >> and not grow according to resizing the columns? I think so, yes. > > He

Re: cvs 2000-03-06

2000-03-08 Thread Rob Walker
> On Wed, 08 Mar 2000 10:38:08 +0100, Herbert Thoma > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Herbert> Rob Walker wrote: >> Does this mean that I think the register window should only shrink >> and not grow according to resizing the columns? I think so, yes. Herbert> I don't agree. I like the regis

Re: cvs 2000-03-06

2000-03-08 Thread Herbert Thoma
Rob Walker wrote: > > Does this mean that I think the register window should only shrink and > not grow according to resizing the columns? I think so, yes. I don't agree. I like the register window to shrink and to grow. So I think the standard answer is: Make it a configurable option. Herbert

Re: cvs 2000-03-06

2000-03-07 Thread Rob Walker
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2000 13:43:43 -0500 (EST), Heath Martin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Heath> Rob Walker writes: >> here is a test for you all to try out. >> >> open up a register which will need to have the columns resized. move >> it to the right side of the desktop, so that the right e

Re: cvs 2000-03-06

2000-03-07 Thread Heath Martin
Rob Walker writes: > here is a test for you all to try out. > > open up a register which will need to have the columns resized. move > it to the right side of the desktop, so that the right edge of it is > right near the right edge of the desktop. grab the left edge of the > register, a

Re: cvs 2000-03-07

2000-03-07 Thread Bryan Larsen
> > + fixed a few bugs in transaction-report.scm which seems to be hosed, at least for me on my pristine branch. (my devel branch is worse). How is it working for others? I've seriously cleaned up the html of my budget report. I'll update transaction-report as well. Bryan --

Re: cvs 2000-03-07

2000-03-07 Thread Dave Peticolas
> + hourglass cursor used when saving and opening files. Ok, it's not *literally* an hourglass, but you get the idea :) dave -- Gnucash Developer's List To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cvs 2000-03-06

2000-03-06 Thread Rob Walker
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2000 22:27:19 -0800 (PST), Rob Walker > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Rob> "cvs update && ./configure --prefix=/home/rob/compiled && make && make install && clear && ./gnucash ~/data/secondtry.xzc" okay, okay, that should have been "make gnome" a few failed attempts later,

Re: cvs 2000-03-06

2000-03-06 Thread Dave Peticolas
> > > On Mon, 06 Mar 2000 18:06:15 -0800, Dave Peticolas > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > Dave> CVS has been updated. > > this has got to be a record for you dave. do you have a date tonight > or something? :-) Nope, I'm still here :) So many people sent in patches I figured I had

Re: cvs 2000-03-06

2000-03-06 Thread Rob Walker
> On Mon, 06 Mar 2000 18:06:15 -0800, Dave Peticolas > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Dave> CVS has been updated. this has got to be a record for you dave. do you have a date tonight or something? :-) I am doing the works on it now. "cvs update && ./configure --prefix=/home/rob/compiled

Re: cvs

2000-03-05 Thread Rob Walker
> On Sun, 05 Mar 2000 16:22:05 -0800, Dave Peticolas > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Dave> CVS has been updated. Dave> New Stuff: Dave> + Rob Browning's patch. This should fix the CVS problems people Dave> were having today. works now! however rob@biffhero-laptop:~/src/cvs/gnucash$

Re: CVS

2000-03-02 Thread Rob Walker
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2000 01:18:36 -0500 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> Server configuration missing --allow-root in inetd.conf >> cvs [checkout aborted]: authorization failed: server cvs.gnucash.org >> rejected access linas> I hope this is fixed now; linas> BTW, you should also see a big ba

Re: CVS

2000-03-02 Thread linas
It's been rumoured that Jeremy Collins said: > > Ummm... following error ours when I try to update/checkout from CVS. > > Server configuration missing --allow-root in inetd.conf > cvs [checkout aborted]: authorization failed: server cvs.gnucash.org > rejected access I hope this is fixed now; B

Re: cvs

2000-02-28 Thread Dave Peticolas
> > Ok, I am currently posting the new release RPMS, SRPMS, and tarballs to > the ftp/www site. I plan on making some annoucements on Freshmeat, > etc... Would it be correct to call this release beta quality? > Yes, that's correct. dave -- Gnucash Developer's List To unsubscribe send empty e

Re: cvs

2000-02-28 Thread Jeremy Collins
Rob Walker wrote: > > > yep, it works, for the five minutes I have had it running. I tried it > without the horizonal separators, and my sooper-dooper color scheme, > and wow!, that's kinda cool. Trying w/o the vertical separators > now Yes this is very nice in single line mode! I haven'

  1   2   >