On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 09:06 -0700, Tracy Brown wrote:
>
> I have no opinion about using scheme or not for anything, but if there
> are folks who want to get rid of it; we can evaluate the use of XSLT
> as a templating engine. I've used it and it's okay but I suspect that
> eguile is much more flex
On Tuesday 01 November 2005 6:34 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Nah, might as well focus on eguile in the short term.
>
> -derek
>
> "Tracy Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have no opinion about using scheme or not for anything, but if there
> > are folks who want to get rid of it; we can evalua
ne. I've used it and it's okay but I suspect that eguile is
> much more flexible.
>
> Tracy.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Josh Sled
> Sent: Tue 11/1/2005 7:43 AM
> To: Brian Rose
> Cc: gnucash-devel@lists.gnucash.org
>
Title: RE: E-guile link
I have no opinion about using scheme or not for anything, but if there are folks who want to get rid of it; we can evaluate the use of XSLT as a templating engine. I've used it and it's okay but I suspect that eguile is much more flexible.
Tracy.
---
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 06:16 -0800, Brian Rose wrote:
> Is Scheme/Guile staying in or going out? Would
> e-guile be deleted within the year
> and replaced?
:) Good question. In my ideal world, we would remove it entirely and
find a different, light-weight templating system for the reports ...
so
IMNSHO, what Josh means is that the WAY gnucash uses guile needs to
be fixed, and the way that gnucash is so /dependent/ on guile needs
to be fixed. Guile needs to be removed from the startup sequence.
Gnucash needs to depend LESS upon guile.
But I don't EVER see guile being /completely/ removed
Hi Derek,
FYI, the e-guile link is back up:
http://woozle.org/~neale/repos/eguile/eguile.html
I looked at it. It "appears" intuitive and nice to
use. However, how does that fit with
Josh Sled's simple roadmap explanation after G2? E.g.,
"We've been really focused on the G2 port and 2.0,
and
