IMNSHO, what Josh means is that the WAY gnucash uses guile needs to
be fixed, and the way that gnucash is so /dependent/ on guile needs
to be fixed. Guile needs to be removed from the startup sequence.
Gnucash needs to depend LESS upon guile.
But I don't EVER see guile being /completely/ removed. I definitely
do not believe that eguile would be ripped out in a year.
-derek
Quoting Brian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Derek,
FYI, the e-guile link is back up:
http://woozle.org/~neale/repos/eguile/eguile.html
I looked at it. It "appears" intuitive and nice to use. However, how
does that fit with
Josh Sled's simple roadmap explanation after G2? E.g.,
"We've been really focused on the G2 port and 2.0, and intentionally
haven't talked with too much rigor about post-2.0, at the same time
there's been a lot of discussion over the last year or so, and I think
it breaks out like:
...
- Scheme removal
...
- Fix modularity system
...." cut&pasted from
http://www.mail-archive.com/gnucash-devel@gnucash.org/msg12143.html
Is Scheme/Guile staying in or going out? Would e-guile be deleted
within the year
and replaced?
Sincerely,
Brian
--
Contagious Design!
web . design . photo
Brian Rose . web programmer
(604)-630-2426 . brianATcontagiousdesignDOTnet
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
