> Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > would it be heretical to ask for pros and cons to only having a gnome
> > > version?
> >
> > That's a good question. I think a slightly less heretical question
> > is should we continue to support the motif version? I make sure that
> > nothin
Dave Peticolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > would it be heretical to ask for pros and cons to only having a gnome
> > version?
>
> That's a good question. I think a slightly less heretical question
> is should we continue to support the motif version? I make sure that
> nothing I do breaks th
Dave Peticolas a écrit :
> >
> > would it be heretical to ask for pros and cons to only having a gnome
> > version?
>
> That's a good question. I think a slightly less heretical question
> is should we continue to support the motif version? I make sure
> that nothing I do breaks the motif versi
"Tony Taylor (ISD)" wrote:
> Cons: The Gnome user-base is mostly technical; most lay-users are going with
> KDE. So, though the users we do get will be savvy enough to help develop
> reports, fix bugs, etc, there won't be a lot of "normal" users.
I use KDE as desktop, but I use the GIMP and gnu
>
> would it be heretical to ask for pros and cons to only having a gnome
> version?
That's a good question. I think a slightly less heretical question
is should we continue to support the motif version? I make sure
that nothing I do breaks the motif version in any way, but sometimes
maintaining
Rob Walker wrote:
>
> would it be heretical to ask for pros and cons to only having a gnome
> version?
>
> rob
Pros: it'll be easier to get a complete version out the door.
Cons: The Gnome user-base is mostly technical; most lay-users are going with
KDE. So, though the users we do get will be
