Query API

2000-12-19 Thread Christopher Browne
On 18 Dec 2000 13:00:56 EST, the world broke into rejoicing as Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Christopher Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It shouldn't be a situation of the GUI submitting database queries; > > instead, the GUI should submit _transaction_ queries to the engine, an

successfully modified transaction report to use query API

2000-08-06 Thread Robert Graham Merkel
had a chance to consider how adding the ability to calculate totals to the Query API might work? Anyway, I'm pleased to have this working, and as soon as Rob and I sort out a new g-wrap release I'll send out the patch. -

Re: find dialog & query API

2000-04-21 Thread Bryan Larsen
> > Are you saying that I should NEVER have multiple lines of a split transaction > which "duplicate" other lines of the transaction? I was talking about something else entirely. But thanks for the excellent example that illustrates the problem. If you use the find dialog, and search on "INCOM

Re: find dialog & query API

2000-04-21 Thread Richard Wackerbarth
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Bryan Larsen wrote: > I've run up against the exact same problem in the "transactions 2" report. > I haven't done anything about it, but it was my opinion that duplicates > should only be removed if: > 1) in a multi-line report format, and > 2) are in the same subsection. >

Re: find dialog & query API

2000-04-21 Thread Bryan Larsen
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote: > > Bryan Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 2. Transactions can appear more than once. That seems pretty durn wacky. > > > > Dave: what did we decide about this? Is it a problem with the Split** > > I am generating, or a natural side effect of t

Re: find dialog & query API

2000-04-21 Thread Dave Peticolas
> Bryan Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > 2. Transactions can appear more than once. That seems pretty durn wacky. > > Dave: what did we decide about this? Is it a problem with the Split** > I am generating, or a natural side effect of the way the register > works? I remember that discuss

Re: find dialog & query API

2000-04-21 Thread Bryan Larsen
> There's support for user-provided query predicates, which I engineered > with Scheme in mind; if you have a user filter-pred that's a scheme > thunk, it's possible to add it to queries also. I just need to write > a little C wrapper to call it. > I definitely don't need this, as the find dial

Re: find dialog & query API

2000-04-21 Thread Bill Gribble
Bryan Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2. Transactions can appear more than once. That seems pretty durn wacky. Dave: what did we decide about this? Is it a problem with the Split** I am generating, or a natural side effect of the way the register works? I remember that discussion about re

find dialog & query API

2000-04-21 Thread Bryan Larsen
OK, I've been playing with the new find dialog. 1: it really highlights something that's bothered me for a long time about the register: the fact that, for a multi-line display, the first line displays the amount in the wrong column. Before you could put up with it, because you knew what accou