achievments in the "engine" and
> > xml-backend and eventually other backends can be re-used. But the GUI is
> > rewritten completely new, from scratch, in C++ and using the Qt toolkit.
> > Fun again. The build system is CMake because its configuration runs
> > magni
gt; other backends can be re-used. But the GUI is rewritten completely new, from
> scratch, in C++ and using the Qt toolkit. Fun again. The build system is CMake
> because its configuration runs magnitudes faster. Fun again. And as a final
> bonus, for MS windows more compiler than before
which I found very abstract and difficult to follow. If the
developers need C++, Qt etc to keep it interesting and keep them
involved, then I shouldn't complain, but if the net result is less
effort put forth to bug fixes and user interface improvements then the
users do not gain
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:04 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Mar 5, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Phil Longstaff wrote:
>
> > Do we want to release a stable 2.4.0? What do we need to finish to do
> > that. There are lots of things happening in trunk, all of which will be
> > useful at some point, but many of w
backend and eventually
> other backends can be re-used. But the GUI is rewritten completely new, from
> scratch, in C++ and using the Qt toolkit. Fun again. The build system is
> CMake
> because its configuration runs magnitudes faster. Fun again. And as a final
Sounds fun. Are you doing t
On Mar 5, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> Do we want to release a stable 2.4.0? What do we need to finish to do
> that. There are lots of things happening in trunk, all of which will be
> useful at some point, but many of which are destabilizing things.
My feeling from the users list
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 22:14 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Freitag, 5. März 2010 schrieb Phil Longstaff:
> > > To give this a try, have qt4 (>=4.5.0) and cmake (>= 2.6.0) installed
> > > and:
> > >
> > > mkdir build-cutecash
> > > cd build-cutecash
> > > cmake ..
> > > make
> > > .
Christian Stimming (stimm...@tuhh.de) said:
> I want to get in the place (again) where I can develop a finance software
> with
> a set of goals which are slightly different from those of the gnucash
> project.
> That's why I started Cutecash - just to see how far I and those who join can
> ge
h of the
> time in C++. It would be faster, too, because the compiler would make
> optimized vtables in machine code.)
>
> While I would have preferred Wx to Qt, either is a big improvement over
> Gtk+/Gnome for platform-independence, so another +1. Qt does have the
> advantage th
Am Freitag, 5. März 2010 schrieb Phil Longstaff:
> > To give this a try, have qt4 (>=4.5.0) and cmake (>= 2.6.0) installed
> > and:
> >
> > mkdir build-cutecash
> > cd build-cutecash
> > cmake ..
> > make
> > ./src/gnc/cutecash
>
> It doesn't seem able to read any of my XML files. Oh we
gnucash requires.
> You require Qt 4.5.0 but I have only 4.4.0.
Currently, the only 4.5.0-feature was the QSharedPointer, which I've removed
again because it was unnecessary and not as powerful as I thought. However, I
would like to stick to 4.5.0 as a requirement because it is alrea
On Mar 5, 2010, at 7:05 AM, Donald Allen wrote:
>
> I should have explicitly registered my agreement with Phil about focusing on
> getting 2.4 out. It's just over a year since 2.2.9 was released. While I
> don't think that's excessive given the nature of the project and the fact
> that the datab
again?
>> >
>> > Actually, we can.
>> >
>> > Announcing a new sub-project in gnucash: The non-GUI parts are re-used
>> in the
>> > state they are, in the C language. This means the double-entry
>> principles and
>> > all of the other a
e
> > state they are, in the C language. This means the double-entry principles
> and
> > all of the other achievments in the "engine" and xml-backend and
> eventually
> > other backends can be re-used. But the GUI is rewritten completely new,
> from
> > s
;engine" and xml-backend and eventually
> other backends can be re-used. But the GUI is rewritten completely new, from
> scratch, in C++ and using the Qt toolkit. Fun again. The build system is
> CMake
> because its configuration runs magnitudes faster. Fun again. And as a fina
I appologize for continually replying to my own mails
but I finally made it.
The extern "C" block in main.cpp should not include system includes.
A patch with my changes to make it work is attached.
Herbert.
Herbert Thoma schrieb:
> Some more experiments:
>
> Qt 4.4.
Hi Herbert,
thanks for the feedback. I will happily commit reduced version
requirements; however, I started the project with relatively high
requirements on purpose because those were the versions I tested with,
so I couldn't give any guarantees with older versions. If you provide
me with
Some more experiments:
Qt 4.4.0 is not sufficient because it does not provide QSharedPointer,
so I installed Qt 4.6.2 and I inserted a #define HAVE_GUILE18 in
src/engine/engine-helpers.c. This way everything compiles but the very
final main.cpp.
I do not really understand the error:
[ 99
Hi Christian,
cool project! I tried to build cutecash and ran into some problems:
I run SuSE 11.0 on this computer. SuSE 11.0 is not so old, however, it
lacks your required minimum versions of glib and Qt.
You require glib (and gobject, gmodule, gthread) 2.20.0 but GnuCash
only requires 2.12.0
ables in machine code.)
While I would have preferred Wx to Qt, either is a big improvement over
Gtk+/Gnome for platform-independence, so another +1.
Qt does have the advantage that the aqbanking interface is already in Qt, so we
need only one toolkit. (Do note that there is a C++ interface
ncing a new sub-project in gnucash: The non-GUI parts are re-used in the
>> state they are, in the C language. This means the double-entry principles and
>> all of the other achievments in the "engine" and xml-backend and eventually
>> other backends can be re-used. But
;engine" and xml-backend and eventually
> other backends can be re-used. But the GUI is rewritten completely new, from
> scratch, in C++ and using the Qt toolkit. Fun again. The build system is
> CMake
> because its configuration runs magnitudes faster. Fun again. And as a fina
Granting that I have less then no right to question an experiment, I am
wondering if you have considered other possible bindings. I find it
especially curious that you picked not just C++, but Qt (KDE), whereas
Gnucash is a Gnome (or at least GTK) app now. Anyway... I note that
Javascript is an
in C++ and using the Qt toolkit. Fun again. The build system is CMake
because its configuration runs magnitudes faster. Fun again. And as a final
bonus, for MS windows more compiler than before are supported, namely this
whole new project can be compiled by MS Visual Studio as well. So here it is
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 4:12 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Aug 23, 2009, at 1:12 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
>
> Dear John,
>>
>> Am Sonntag, 23. August 2009 04:39 schrieb John Ralls:
>>
>>> On Aug 22, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Charles Day wrote:
>>>
I believe aqbanking is written for Qt3, so it w
On Aug 23, 2009, at 1:12 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
Dear John,
Am Sonntag, 23. August 2009 04:39 schrieb John Ralls:
On Aug 22, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Charles Day wrote:
I believe aqbanking is written for Qt3, so it would have to be
patched to compile against Qt4.
I did notice instructions i
how, when it comes to WIN32 I'm way out of my field. I never ran GnuCash on
Windows, and I never tested the QT4 port of AqBanking's QT frontend (because
QBankManager and KMyMoney are still QT3-based).
But maybe someone on the AqBanking-list did...
Regards
Martin
--
"Things are
Hi Chris,
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 22:15 -0500, Chris M. Lindsey wrote:
> Frank (and all gnucash developers),
> Thanks for your brief reply. The gnucash wiki indicates that versions
> starting with 2.2.1 no longer need to install Qt:
>
> http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Win
Frank (and all gnucash developers),
Thanks for your brief reply. The gnucash wiki indicates that versions
starting with 2.2.1 no longer need to install Qt:
http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Windows#2.2.0_only:_Online_Banking_Setup_Druid_.28needs_Qt.29
Can I gain access to the Online Banking portion
Hi,
I think, you wrote the answer:
Am Monday 15 September 2008 02:35:45 schrieb Chris M. Lindsey:
> Please install the
> "Qt/Windows Open Source Edition" from Trolltech by downloading it from
> www.trolltech.com
Regards
Frank
__
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am attempting to build gnucash under in Microsoft XP running vmware on a
Microsoft Vista machine.
In the "Instructions for an (almost) automated lbuild" file I think I printed
from the Packaging dir,
it says to install QT.
Can someone please specify exactly for
Hi Stephen!
On Jan 25, 2008 6:05 PM, Stephen Grant Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am running Vista Xp inside VMWare on a Windows Vista Home Edition Box.
>
> I downloaded and installed qt-win-opensource-4.3.3-mingw.exe into
> C:\qt\4.3.3
>
> I wen
Hi All,
I am running Vista Xp inside VMWare on a Windows Vista Home Edition Box.
I downloaded and installed qt-win-opensource-4.3.3-mingw.exe into C:\qt\4.3.3
I went into the packaging directory.
I changed defualts.sh to use AqBanking.
I deleted AqBanking due to qt3-wizard.exe not being found
"Stephen Grant Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear Sir/Madams,
>
> I downloaded qt-win-opensource-4.3.3-ming.exe.
> When I installed it under Windows XP
Dear Sir/Madams,
I downloaded qt-win-opensource-4.3.3-ming.exe.
When I installed it under Windows XP I got the following comment
--
There is a problem with your
ing rebuild of AqBanking,
> because I think otherwise you would have needed to actively block QT or
> install.sh would have failed. Currently there is no mechanism to let
> install.sh automagically rebuild single libraries whose instructions
> changed since the last build. There are severa
Hi Nathan,
regarding http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435928, I wonder
whether the distributed GnuCash 2.1.1 binary setup lacks the qt3-wizard
for AqBanking. This may be due to a missing rebuild of AqBanking,
because I think otherwise you would have needed to actively block QT or
FYI.
--linas
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 08:38:37PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to remark:
> Dear GNUCash Developer,
>
> I am writing a QT C++ version of a Check writing
> program for Linux. It is similar to Versa Check's
> software. It is for U.S. Currency Only
> Is noone interested in the qt version? The web site seemed to say that it
> was in work. On the web site, it also says that the big drawback on the
> gnome side is a good ledger-like widget. Is that still an issue?
In regards to the second question, the gnome register widget has
Is noone interested in the qt version? The web site seemed to say that it
was in work. On the web site, it also says that the big drawback on the
gnome side is a good ledger-like widget. Is that still an issue?
cvs is great. I'd just have to port it to windows since I inadvertantly
bou
It's been rumoured that Mehul N. Sanghvi said:
>
> Out of curiosity, we currently "support" Motif/LessTif, GNOME, and QT.
> I take it that Motif/LessTif will be the main one with GNOME and QT
> being side developments. Is this a correct assumption ? Or are we
> goi
>
> It's been rumoured that Rob Coker said:
> >
> > How is the qt version going? What version number of code should I get to
> > see the qt stuff? I don't have cvs, so I need to get the source off the ftp
> > site.
>
> The qt code has not b
It's been rumoured that Rob Coker said:
>
> How is the qt version going? What version number of code should I get to
> see the qt stuff? I don't have cvs, so I need to get the source off the ftp
> site.
The qt code has not been touched in almost a year. I don't
How is the qt version going? What version number of code should I get to
see the qt stuff? I don't have cvs, so I need to get the source off the ftp
site.
Thanks
Rob Coker
--
Gnucash Developer's List
To unsubscribe send empty email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some news from my Qt version of gnucash.
- I adapted a CVS snapshot to compile with Qt.
- I tried to send my patches to linas@linas@org, but somehow they didn't
arrived :(. Is it ok if I send them to this ml?
- Is it possible to separate between C and C++? I compiled
first the Motif and
It's been rumoured that Dirk Schoenberger said:
>
> Some news from my Qt version of gnucash.
>
> - I adapted a CVS snapshot to compile with Qt.
> - I tried to send my patches to linas@linas@org, but somehow they didn't
> arrived :(. Is it ok if I send them to this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> What more can I say?
As far as I know the motif build is the only one that works right now.
GNOME and QT both have to be updated to reflect recent engine and
startup changes.
--
Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F
johayek@Hayek5 $ make qt
make FLAVOR=qt build-flavor
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/tmp/gnucash-1.1.20'
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/tmp/gnucash-1.1.20/lib'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `qt'.
make[2]: Leaving directory `/us
48 matches
Mail list logo
