On Mar 5, 2010, at 7:05 AM, Donald Allen wrote: > > I should have explicitly registered my agreement with Phil about focusing on > getting 2.4 out. It's just over a year since 2.2.9 was released. While I > don't think that's excessive given the nature of the project and the fact > that the database back-end is a big deal, I think with some focused effort > on QA and bug-fixing, it can be ready for release in the near future. I > think now is exactly the wrong time to get into an attention-diverting > debate about languages and tools. That can and should wait, in my opinion, > until 2.4 is released and known to be stable. >
While I disagree with Don about C++, I agree whole-heartedly about focussing on getting 2.4 shipped on schedule. We can have the language and toolkit discussions and decide whether to adopt Christian's branch afterwards. Regards, John Ralls _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
