[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) writes:
>> True. I was sort of thinking in terms of "g_object" (or gtk_object)..
>> Which sort of makes some basic level of sense to me.. *shrugs*
>
> Is this an explicit statement of support for g_objects? In the past,
> you've seemed allergic to them, and so
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:20:17PM -0400, Derek Atkins was heard to remark:
>
> But I see no reason not to combine them..
> Unless there is a strong reason why queriable objects and 'storable'
> objects need to be (or should be) different.
OK.
> >> So what's your conceptual distinction between
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) writes:
> Well, you're the guy who made this distinction when you wrote
> the code way back when ... :)
>
> -- object defines the relationship to the 'backend'.
> -- class defines parameters.
I had no QofClass, only QofObject... "Class" (and "Instance"
were add
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:45:37PM -0400, Derek Atkins was heard to remark:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) writes:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:16:20PM -0400, Derek Atkins was heard to remark:
> >> > void qof_class_foreach (QofClassForeachCB, gpointer user_data);
> >>
> >> We already had
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) writes:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:16:20PM -0400, Derek Atkins was heard to remark:
>> > void qof_class_foreach (QofClassForeachCB, gpointer user_data);
>>
>> We already had qof_object_foreach_type(); why do we need a
>> qof_class_foreach()?
>
> I am thinking a
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 05:12:09PM +0100, Neil Williams was heard to remark:
>
> The final code should open up all sorts of possibilities, like closing books
> easily
I've already got code that closes books; its been checked in and
operational for a while (years?), except that the business clas
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:16:20PM -0400, Derek Atkins was heard to remark:
> > void qof_class_foreach (QofClassForeachCB, gpointer user_data);
>
> We already had qof_object_foreach_type(); why do we need a
> qof_class_foreach()?
I am thinking about merging object and class into one thing.
Maybe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) writes:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:02:28PM -0400, Derek Atkins was heard to remark:
>>
>> The idea here is a general BookMerge, to allow you to combine two
>> books together. This has many purposes:
>
> Ahh, OK, that makes sense. I've sort-of wanted that featu
On Sunday 20 June 2004 4:46, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> > I've posted the code as it was this morning (see other message) and I can
> > explain why a GSList of parameter names is sufficient for me and,
> > probably, would be better than a foreach of the entire list for my needs.
>
> Hmm. I've found tha
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:02:28PM -0400, Derek Atkins was heard to remark:
>
> The idea here is a general BookMerge, to allow you to combine two
> books together. This has many purposes:
Ahh, OK, that makes sense. I've sort-of wanted that feature for a
while. (well, for gnotime, actually, but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linas Vepstas) writes:
>> The original scenario involved just adding a single invoice - in that case, I
>
> I haven't yet read the back-emails. If you're working with invoices,
> why would you need to know about all objects or all paramters?
> Don't you already ahve a clear i
On Sunday 20 June 2004 4:28, Neil Williams wrote:
>
> The original scenario involved just adding a single invoice - in that case,
> I only need to work on certain accounts. Sure, when merging a closed book
> into an open book, it'll all come in to play but that may take some time.
i.e. The user ma
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 04:28:43PM +0100, Neil Williams was heard to remark:
> On Sunday 20 June 2004 4:12, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 04:49:37PM -0400, Derek Atkins was heard to remark:
> > > Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > "one can then ask, at run time, wh
On Sunday 20 June 2004 4:12, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 04:49:37PM -0400, Derek Atkins was heard to remark:
> > Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > "one can then ask, at run time, what parameters are associated with a
> > > given type, even if those parameters were n
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 04:49:37PM -0400, Derek Atkins was heard to remark:
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > "one can then ask, at run time, what parameters are associated with a given
> > type, even if those parameters were not known at compile time."
> > src/doc/html/group__Cla
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "one can then ask, at run time, what parameters are associated with a given
> type, even if those parameters were not known at compile time."
> src/doc/html/group__Class.html
Yes, at this point there are no APIs to implement this.
> I can see how to
On Friday 18 June 2004 9:24, Neil Williams wrote:
> The most recent (working) draft is back on codehelp:
http://www.codehelp.co.uk/code/basic.c
Sorry.
--
Neil Williams
=
http://www.codehelp.co.uk/
http://www.dclug.org.uk/
http://www.isbn.org.uk/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/isbn
"one can then ask, at run time, what parameters are associated with a given
type, even if those parameters were not known at compile time."
src/doc/html/group__Class.html
I can see how to query individual parameters from qofclass when you know the
name and I've got access to the getter and sette
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 18 June 2004 3:08, Linas Vepstas wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 10:46:33AM -0400, Derek Atkins was heard to remark:
>> > > void gnc_bm_foreach (QofEntity obj, gpointer ud1); doesn't work. Why?
>> >
>> > You need (QofEntity* obj, gpointer ud1
On Friday 18 June 2004 3:08, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 10:46:33AM -0400, Derek Atkins was heard to remark:
> > > void gnc_bm_foreach (QofEntity obj, gpointer ud1); doesn't work. Why?
> >
> > You need (QofEntity* obj, gpointer ud1).
>
> I'm guessing that the * was dropped accide
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 10:46:33AM -0400, Derek Atkins was heard to remark:
> > void gnc_bm_foreach (QofEntity obj, gpointer ud1); doesn't work. Why?
>
> You need (QofEntity* obj, gpointer ud1).
I'm guessing that the * was dropped accidentally, and then Niel
had a very hard seeing that it was m
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 17 June 2004 4:22, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>qof_object_foreach(QOF_TYPE_XXX, book, my_foreach_cb, my_cb_arg);
>> Well, DUH, gnc_book_merge_foreach doesn't match the QofEntityForeachCB
>> type!
>
On Thursday 17 June 2004 4:22, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>qof_object_foreach(QOF_TYPE_XXX, book, my_foreach_cb, my_cb_arg);
> Well, DUH, gnc_book_merge_foreach doesn't match the QofEntityForeachCB
> type!
That's what I can't get straight. I haven't used
23 matches
Mail list logo
