On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 04:28:43PM +0100, Neil Williams was heard to remark: > On Sunday 20 June 2004 4:12, Linas Vepstas wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 04:49:37PM -0400, Derek Atkins was heard to remark: > > > Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > "one can then ask, at run time, what parameters are associated with a > > > > given type, even if those parameters were not known at compile time." > > > > src/doc/html/group__Class.html > > > > > > Yes, at this point there are no APIs to implement this. > > > > Whoops. It is straightforward enough to add a 'for-each' function. > > I'll see if I can do that right now. > > I've posted the code as it was this morning (see other message) and I can > explain why a GSList of parameter names is sufficient for me and, probably, > would be better than a foreach of the entire list for my needs.
Hmm. I've found that the foreach() style of programming is better ifor many reasons, and want to support only that. I was tickled to notice the other day that even the Linux kernel is migrating to a foreach style of coding. It should be easy for you to take a foreach interface and build a gslist if that's what you want. > The original scenario involved just adding a single invoice - in that case, I I haven't yet read the back-emails. If you're working with invoices, why would you need to know about all objects or all paramters? Don't you already ahve a clear idea of what an invoice is? --linas -- pub 1024D/01045933 2001-02-01 Linas Vepstas (Labas!) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key fingerprint = 8305 2521 6000 0B5E 8984 3F54 64A9 9A82 0104 5933 _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
