On 05/09/2014 06:37 PM, David Osguthorpe wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:47:34PM -0700, mshapiro wrote:
David Osguthorpe wrote
I have a very hacky implementation in gnucash to call python from guile
and
return results to guile - I found existing libraries to do both
(no updates to gnucash req
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:47:34PM -0700, mshapiro wrote:
> David Osguthorpe wrote
> > I have a very hacky implementation in gnucash to call python from guile
> > and
> > return results to guile - I found existing libraries to do both
> > (no updates to gnucash required - just a user prototype.scm
e to do more forecasting
than the standard reports provide.
Marc
--
View this message in context:
http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com/Python-bindings-patch-documentation-examples-tp4667098p4670696.html
Sent from the GnuCash - Dev mailing list archive a
Am 12.01.2014 20:22, schrieb Henning Jacobs:
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently discovered the great Python bindings and just updated
> http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Python_Bindings to contain pointers to my
> scripts.
>
> Now my questions:
>
> * GncPrice does not contain a proper __init__, therefore I monkey
>
On Tuesday 14 January 2014 21:53:40 Henning Jacobs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for all the answers and insights I got from your mails --- what
> I got out of it:
>
> * Sadly no core developer seems to be using the Python bindings :-(
Actually I am using the python bindings to synchronize data in gnuc
On Jan 14, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Henning Jacobs wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for all the answers and insights I got from your mails --- what I
> got out of it:
[SNIP]
> * Core C/C++ API will mostly stay stable, so Python bindings will/should
> be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
thanks for all the answers and insights I got from your mails --- what I
got out of it:
* Sadly no core developer seems to be using the Python bindings :-(
* There are some guys actively using it for their needs.
* Python seems to bring compatib
> >
> > what is the Query interface - is that the libqof functions??
> >
> > Is there an example which shows how this is done - I dont remember seeing
> > any query functions
> > for budgets in gnc-budget.c
>
> The current interface is QOFQuery. All of the persistent objects in Engine
> imple
On Jan 14, 2014, at 8:05 AM, David Osguthorpe
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 03:59:29PM -0800, John Ralls wrote:
>>
>> Please remember to copy the list on all replies. Use “reply all” or, if your
>> mailer supports it, “reply list”.
>
> sorry - on some lists the list email is first - other
David Osguthorpe writes:
> what is the Query interface - is that the libqof functions??
yes, see qofquery.h
> Is there an example which shows how this is done - I dont remember
> seeing any query functions
> for budgets in gnc-budget.c
They wouldn't be there. QofQuery is a generic framework u
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 03:59:29PM -0800, John Ralls wrote:
>
> Please remember to copy the list on all replies. Use “reply all” or, if your
> mailer supports it, “reply list”.
sorry - on some lists the list email is first - others not - remembering which
one is which
is a problem
>
> You sho
John Ralls writes:
> You should use the Query interface to find objects. If there are any
> “foo_find_by_bar” functions in the API now, they’ll be ripped out in
> the rewrite. In order to get to multiuser we’ll only be instantiating
> objects on demand, ideally only to edit unless it turns out to
Hi Henning,
> * Are there any other known/major users of the Python bindings?
> * Who is maintaining the Python bindings and is there any roadmap to
> improve them?
While not a major user of the Python bindings I've contributed a few
minor fixes and enhancements so far which are visiable in re
On Jan 13, 2014, at 11:14 AM, David Osguthorpe
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:23:17AM -0800, John Ralls wrote:
>>> so what should I do with the updates I was proposing to ask you about
>>> eg. no functionality to access budgets in current bindings - I have updates
>>> for these
>>> - one
David Osguthorpe writes:
>> Unfortunately Python isn't a very good built-in scripting language,
>> and supporting it on Mac and Windows is a serious PITA. Guile is
>> better, except the number of Scheme programmers loose in the world is
>> pretty small. For the foreseeable future I'd expect that
On Monday 13 January 2014 08:39:36 David Osguthorpe wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 08:14:11PM -0800, John Ralls wrote:
> > > * Who is maintaining the Python bindings and is there any roadmap
> > > to
> > > improve them?
> >
> > They're maintained enough to keep them compiling by the core team.
>
On Jan 13, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On Sunday 12 January 2014 20:14:11 John Ralls wrote:
> > On Jan 12, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Henning Jacobs wrote:
> > > IMHO the Python bindings are a really great way of enhancing the
> > > GnuCash functionality without having to code C/C++ (I wo
On Jan 13, 2014, at 8:39 AM, David Osguthorpe
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 08:14:11PM -0800, John Ralls wrote:
>>
>>> * Who is maintaining the Python bindings and is there any roadmap to
>>> improve them?
>>
>> They're maintained enough to keep them compiling by the core team. They're
>>
On Sunday 12 January 2014 20:14:11 John Ralls wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Henning Jacobs wrote:
> > IMHO the Python bindings are a really great way of enhancing the
> > GnuCash functionality without having to code C/C++ (I would not be
> > very productive with it...)
>
> Unfortunately
On Monday 13 January 2014 08:16:17 David Osguthorpe wrote:
> I am using the python bindings - in fact was just going to see about
> getting some patches to update the bindings.
>
> Just updated to 2.6.0 - looks as though some functions that used to
> exist no longer exist in the Account class so n
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 08:14:11PM -0800, John Ralls wrote:
>
> > * Who is maintaining the Python bindings and is there any roadmap to
> > improve them?
>
> They're maintained enough to keep them compiling by the core team. They're not
> really part of our development plan, they're mostly just th
I am using the python bindings - in fact was just going to see about
getting some patches to update the bindings.
Just updated to 2.6.0 - looks as though some functions that used to exist
no longer exist in the Account class so need to be removed from
gnucash_business.py
Ive noticed that the pyth
On Jan 12, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Henning Jacobs wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently discovered the great Python bindings and just updated
> http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Python_Bindings to contain pointers to my
> scripts.
>
> Now my questions:
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I recently discovered the great Python bindings and just updated
http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Python_Bindings to contain pointers to my
scripts.
Now my questions:
* GncPrice does not contain a proper __init__, therefore I monkey
patched it:
htt
24 matches
Mail list logo
