I will try to have a look at these this weekend and see if I can't address
some of these concerns. Need to get in front of a computer where I can play
with this stuff.
Cheers,
Darin
On August 10, 2004 10:56 pm, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 06:48:10PM -0400, Chris Shoemake
I will try to have a look at these this weekend and see if I can't address
some of these concerns. Need to get in front of a computer where I can play
with this stuff.
Cheers,
Darin
On August 10, 2004 10:56 pm, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 06:48:10PM -0400, Chris Shoemake
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 06:48:10PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> I checked it out, and compiled it.
>
> Here are some initial impressions. I'll look more closely later.
>
Second look: more comments:
1) In New Budget Category setup, the period column says monthy:10, even
though I selected the
Try again... Code was just committed a few days ago.
-derek
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Darin, et al.,
> I've read the thread(s) regarding budgeting in gnucash. It
> seemed that the design was sound and that things were progressing in the
> right direction. I was hopin
>
> Indeed, the attachments appear empty...
>
Hmmm something must have mucked up. I will try to send them again when I get
home tonight. Sorry about the confusion.
Cheers,
Darin
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.gnucash.
Darin, et al.,
I've read the thread(s) regarding budgeting in gnucash. It
seemed that the design was sound and that things were progressing in the
right direction. I was hoping to look more closely at the status. (The
http://www.darin.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ link is dead.)
I've ch
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) It compiles!
I *did* verify this before I committed
> 2) When I click on new budget the "new budget 'druid'" opens _behind_
> the budget list. I think it should be in front.
> 3) In fact, it seems to be _permanently_ behind the budget list.
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 05:04:05PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Applied to G2 CVS.
>
> Another thing to handle, at some point, is a set of test cases
> to test the core (engine) budget functions.
>
> -derek
I checked it out, and compiled it.
Here are some initial impressions. I'll look more cl
Applied to G2 CVS.
Another thing to handle, at some point, is a set of test cases
to test the core (engine) budget functions.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/w
Darin Willits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On August 5, 2004 06:34 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> A few comments..
>>
>> 1) Your changes to app-utils/gnc-ui-common.h and overrides/gnucash
>>are unwarranted. Also, you've created a commodity.glade in gnome/glade
>>that conflicts with the commo
On August 5, 2004 06:34 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> A few comments..
>
> 1) Your changes to app-utils/gnc-ui-common.h and overrides/gnucash
>are unwarranted. Also, you've created a commodity.glade in gnome/glade
>that conflicts with the commodity.glade in gnome-utils.
Crap. I remember this
A few comments..
1) Your changes to app-utils/gnc-ui-common.h and overrides/gnucash
are unwarranted. Also, you've created a commodity.glade in gnome/glade
that conflicts with the commodity.glade in gnome-utils.
2) You probably shouldn't use xaccXXX for new names (e.g. xaccBudgetDef)
3) I'm
G'day Darin,
* Darin Willits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040803 16:09]:
>
> > > Can anyone else read it?
> >
> > Indeed, the attachments appear empty...
>
> Oops sorry. Something must have mucked up. I will re-send this patch
> tonight when I get home. Sorry for the confusion.
Have I missed your
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do I understand correctly that the conditions to add a single file,
> testing/try-my-patch.diff, to the CVS repository are the same as to commit
> all of the changes contained in that diff to all of the various affected
> files in the tree?
For the mo
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 11:07:48PM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > BTW, is there any precedent for patches like this to be placed in some
> > sort of "patches in progress" area of CVS? That way, they can be
> > versioned, easily retrieved, revised, and
> > Can anyone else read it?
>
> Indeed, the attachments appear empty...
Oops sorry. Something must have mucked up. I will re-send this patch
tonight when I get home. Sorry for the confusion.
Cheers,
Darin
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PR
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:36:27AM -0400, Darin Willits wrote:
>> Chris, et al.
>>
>> I have attached the updated budgeting patch. It has been modified to
>> use the new QOF object structure and fix some naming conventions that
>> Derek mentioned on
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 09:36:27AM -0400, Darin Willits wrote:
> Chris, et al.
>
> I have attached the updated budgeting patch. It has been modified to
> use the new QOF object structure and fix some naming conventions that
> Derek mentioned on the last patch.
Thank you kindly. I know what it's
Chris, et al.
I have attached the updated budgeting patch. It has been modified to
use the new QOF object structure and fix some naming conventions that
Derek mentioned on the last patch.
I have also added a couple brief notes to the GNOME2_STATUS file.
Basically the budgeting functionality is
19 matches
Mail list logo
