On 15-01-13 03:36, Yawar Amin wrote:
Hi Geert,
On 2012-08-13 05:57, Geert Janssens wrote:
[...]
[1] http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Git-bz
Git-bz does look useful to me. People that want to submit patches
without having commit access can install this locally. At first sight
it doesn't seem to c
Hi Geert,
On 2012-08-13 05:57, Geert Janssens wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> [1] http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Git-bz
>>
> Git-bz does look useful to me. People that want to submit patches
> without having commit access can install this locally. At first sight
> it doesn't seem to create new bugs if the patc
Geert Janssens wrote
>
> On 13-08-12 11:33, reubano wrote:
>> reubano wrote
>>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Derek Atkins
>>> wrote:
Reuben Cummings writes:
Gnucash is following the Gnome patch submission practice. Gnome uses
git,
but not Github,
On 13-08-12 11:33, reubano wrote:
reubano wrote
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Derek Atkins
wrote:
Reuben Cummings writes:
Gnucash is following the Gnome patch submission practice. Gnome uses git,
but not Github, and
doesn't use pull requests (which are
On 11-08-12 20:36, Derek Atkins wrote
Any chance we could rename this "Git Migration" instead of "Github
Migration"? I don't think we will ever full migrate fully to github. I
just think it's a bad idea to let go of master.
(I tried sending a message like this this morning but it doesn't appe
reubano wrote
>
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Derek Atkins
> wrote:
>> Reuben Cummings writes:
>>
>> Gnucash is following the Gnome patch submission practice. Gnome uses git,
>> but not Github, and
>> doesn't use pull requests (which are actually design
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Reuben Cummings writes:
>
>> Yes, I figured the round-a-bout patch submission method is due to
>> maintain svn compatibility. But that still doesn't answer my original
>> question of a "time-frame for full github integration". A perfectly
>>
On Aug 11, 2012, at 5:12 AM, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> If GnuCash switches to git, can I request that the gnc_authors file be
> corrected with my name and email for username 'chris'?
>
Done, but it won't have any effect unless you commit a new change. Fixing it in
the repository would make an
Geert Janssens writes:
> On 11-08-12 12:48, Frank H. Ellenberger wrote:
>> Hoi,
>>
>> Am 11.08.2012 12:17, schrieb Geert Janssens:
>>> I have created a wiki page to track the progress of our git migration.
>>> It currently lists the things I know that still have to be done. Please
>>> add to it i
Reuben Cummings writes:
> Yes, I figured the round-a-bout patch submission method is due to
> maintain svn compatibility. But that still doesn't answer my original
> question of a "time-frame for full github integration". A perfectly
> acceptable answer is "No, gnucash will never be fully integra
John,
On Sat, August 11, 2012 10:25 am, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Aug 11, 2012, at 12:55 AM, Reuben Cummings wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Am 11.08.2012 09:17, schrieb reubano:
>>> :
I'm glad you guys have migrated to Git/GitHub.
On Aug 11, 2012, at 12:55 AM, Reuben Cummings wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 11.08.2012 09:17, schrieb reubano:
>> :
>>> I'm glad you guys have migrated to Git/GitHub. I definitely think this will
>>> open up the doors for new contribut
Am 11.08.2012 15:33, schrieb Chris Shoemaker:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Sorry, I was referring to gnc_authors, not AUTHORS:
>
> https://github.com/Gnucash/git-helper-scripts/blob/master/gnc_authors
Ah, some github specific file. Then somebody else has to do the job.
> I was trying to reuse some date-hand
Why wait?
-derek
Sent from my HTC smartphone
- Reply message -
From: "Chris Shoemaker"
To: "Derek Atkins"
Cc: "Geert Janssens" , "Frank H. Ellenberger"
,
Subject: Git Migration: github with svn access
Date: Sat, Aug 11, 2012 8:12 AM
If Gnu
> From: "Geert Janssens"
> To: "Frank H. Ellenberger"
> Cc:
> Subject: Git Migration: github with svn access
> Date: Sat, Aug 11, 2012 6:52 AM
>
>
> On 11-08-12 12:48, Frank H. Ellenberger wrote:
> > Hoi,
> >
> > Am 11.08.2012 12:17, schri
smartphone
- Reply message -
From: "Geert Janssens"
To: "Frank H. Ellenberger"
Cc:
Subject: Git Migration: github with svn access
Date: Sat, Aug 11, 2012 6:52 AM
On 11-08-12 12:48, Frank H. Ellenberger wrote:
> Hoi,
>
> Am 11.08.2012 12:17, schrieb Geert Janss
On 11-08-12 12:48, Frank H. Ellenberger wrote:
Hoi,
Am 11.08.2012 12:17, schrieb Geert Janssens:
I have created a wiki page to track the progress of our git migration.
It currently lists the things I know that still have to be done. Please
add to it if you know more or have fixed some items:
ht
Hoi,
Am 11.08.2012 12:17, schrieb Geert Janssens:
> I have created a wiki page to track the progress of our git migration.
> It currently lists the things I know that still have to be done. Please
> add to it if you know more or have fixed some items:
> http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Github_Migratio
I have created a wiki page to track the progress of our git migration.
It currently lists the things I know that still have to be done. Please
add to it if you know more or have fixed some items:
http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Github_Migration
Geert
___
On 11-08-12 11:24, Geert Janssens wrote:
Many things have been said already about migrating from svn to git on
the lists. I'll try to summarize what has been mostly agreed upon and
the current status (as I remember it). Others can voice their opinion
if they don't agree with me here:
I think mos
On 11-08-12 10:32, Reuben Cummings wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger
wrote:
Hi Reuben,
Am 11.08.2012 09:55, schrieb Reuben Cummings:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger
wrote:
:
http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Git
Where is the Problem? ;-)
Frank
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger
wrote:
> Hi Reuben,
>
> Am 11.08.2012 09:55, schrieb Reuben Cummings:
>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger
>> wrote:
> :
>>> http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Git
>>> Where is the Problem? ;-)
>>>
>>> Frank
>>
>> Yes, I have r
Hi Reuben,
Am 11.08.2012 09:55, schrieb Reuben Cummings:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger
> wrote:
:
>> http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Git
>> Where is the Problem? ;-)
>>
>> Frank
>
> Yes, I have read that. Look at the directions for sending a patch and
> notice the comment
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 11.08.2012 09:17, schrieb reubano:
> :
>> I'm glad you guys have migrated to Git/GitHub. I definitely think this will
>> open up the doors for new contributors (myself included). I know full GitHub
>> integration will take
Hi,
Am 11.08.2012 09:17, schrieb reubano:
:
> I'm glad you guys have migrated to Git/GitHub. I definitely think this will
> open up the doors for new contributors (myself included). I know full GitHub
> integration will take time, but can someone comment on the time-frame for
> this, i.e. being ab
Christian Stimming-4 wrote
>
> Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2012, 19:04:10 schrieb Andy Clayton:
>> > If I have some time during the next days, I'll look into porting the
>> > SVN-
>> > dependencies in our build scripts to using git. Also, I don't think
>> it's
>> > necessary to distinguish tags that s
Hi Andy,
Christian Stimming writes:
> Am Dienstag, 21. Februar 2012, 12:20:06 schrieb Andy Clayton:
>> Thanks for the update. I tried getting gnucash to build on windows 7 in a
>> virtualbox VM so I could look into this and other issues, but performace
>> was horrible. Configuring and compiling
Am Dienstag, 21. Februar 2012, 12:20:06 schrieb Andy Clayton:
> Thanks for the update. I tried getting gnucash to build on windows 7 in a
> virtualbox VM so I could look into this and other issues, but performace
> was horrible. Configuring and compiling a single dependency took hours.
> Apparently
On Jan 28, 2012 4:30 PM, "Christian Stimming"
wrote:
>
> Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2012, 19:04:10 schrieb Andy Clayton:
> > Is the switch to git stuck on 1) the sed crash on windows after adding
> > git and then 2) porting the build scripts?
>
> Yes, both.
>
> The porting of the build scripts is a ta
On Jan 30, 2012, at 9:19 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> John Ralls writes:
>
>> No, that won't work, because it will still need $PATH to find its dlls.
>
> Not if all the dependent DLLs are in the same directory as the .exe
>
Perhaps I said that wrong. It won't work if it can find the wrong DLLs
John Ralls writes:
> No, that won't work, because it will still need $PATH to find its dlls.
Not if all the dependent DLLs are in the same directory as the .exe
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board
On Jan 28, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2012, 19:04:10 schrieb Andy Clayton:
>>> If I have some time during the next days, I'll look into porting the
>>> SVN-
>>> dependencies in our build scripts to using git. Also, I don't think it's
>>> necessary to dist
Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2012, 19:04:10 schrieb Andy Clayton:
> > If I have some time during the next days, I'll look into porting the
> > SVN-
> > dependencies in our build scripts to using git. Also, I don't think it's
> > necessary to distinguish tags that should trigger a build from those
> > whi
On 12/29/2011 03:50 PM, John Ralls wrote:
On Dec 29, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Christian Stimming wrote:
I've been using git on windows for years in my daily work by now. The one from
http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/downloads/list?can=3 is indeed the "official"
one if you want a git (cmdline) executab
On Dec 29, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 29. Dezember 2011, 09:47:35 schrieb John Ralls:
ISTM it would be better to have the release script look at the SHA
reference in the tag using git rather than to depend upon Github's
subversion gateway.
>
> Ab
Am Donnerstag, 29. Dezember 2011, 09:47:35 schrieb John Ralls:
> >> ISTM it would be better to have the release script look at the SHA
> >> reference in the tag using git rather than to depend upon Github's
> >> subversion gateway.
Absolutely. After thinking about this for a bit, I think retrievin
On Dec 29, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Op woensdag 28 december 2011 17:08:13 schreef John Ralls:
>>> Heh, don't underestimate the configuration of our Windows build server.
>>>
>>> It checks every night if it has to (re)build some tagged versions. It
>>> does this by making a list
Op woensdag 28 december 2011 17:08:13 schreef John Ralls:
> > Heh, don't underestimate the configuration of our Windows build server.
> >
> > It checks every night if it has to (re)build some tagged versions. It
> > does this by making a list of all tags (and their associated revision)
> > and com
On Dec 28, 2011, at 6:45 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Op zondag 25 december 2011 10:26:34 schreef John Ralls:
>> On Dec 25, 2011, at 9:13 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>>> On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:07 PM, John Ralls wrote:
On Nov 28, 2011, at 9:37 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On maandag 28 november 20
Op zondag 25 december 2011 10:26:34 schreef John Ralls:
> On Dec 25, 2011, at 9:13 AM, John Ralls wrote:
> > On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:07 PM, John Ralls wrote:
> >> On Nov 28, 2011, at 9:37 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> >>> On maandag 28 november 2011, John Ralls wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2011, at 2:32 PM
On Dec 25, 2011, at 9:13 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:07 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 28, 2011, at 9:37 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>>
>>> On maandag 28 november 2011, John Ralls wrote:
On Nov 27, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On woensdag 23 novem
On Nov 28, 2011, at 3:07 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2011, at 9:37 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>
>> On maandag 28 november 2011, John Ralls wrote:
>>> On Nov 27, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
On woensdag 23 november 2011, John Ralls wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2011, at 10:22 A
On Nov 28, 2011, at 9:37 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On maandag 28 november 2011, John Ralls wrote:
>> On Nov 27, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>>> On woensdag 23 november 2011, John Ralls wrote:
On Nov 11, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On vrijdag 11 november 2011,
On maandag 28 november 2011, John Ralls wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > On woensdag 23 november 2011, John Ralls wrote:
> >> On Nov 11, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> >>> On vrijdag 11 november 2011, Yawar Amin wrote:
> Hi Geert,
>
> On 20
On Nov 27, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On woensdag 23 november 2011, John Ralls wrote:
>> On Nov 11, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>>> On vrijdag 11 november 2011, Yawar Amin wrote:
Hi Geert,
On 2011-11-11, at 11:47, Geert Janssens wrote:
>> […]
>
On woensdag 23 november 2011, John Ralls wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > On vrijdag 11 november 2011, Yawar Amin wrote:
> >> Hi Geert,
> >>
> >> On 2011-11-11, at 11:47, Geert Janssens wrote:
> […]
> >>>
> >>> Is there a way to create a branch via the github
On Nov 11, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On vrijdag 11 november 2011, Yawar Amin wrote:
>> Hi Geert,
>>
>> On 2011-11-11, at 11:47, Geert Janssens wrote:
[…]
>>>
>>> Is there a way to create a branch via the github interface ? Or do I have
>>> to create one on my local repo an
On zaterdag 12 november 2011, Yawar Amin wrote:
> Hi Geert, run:
>
> git push origin :master
>
> This pushes an empty branch name (the part before the colon) from your
> local repo to the master branch of the origin repo, effectively deleting
> it.
Wow, not exactly the most intuitive command cho
Hi Geert, run:
git push origin :master
This pushes an empty branch name (the part before the colon) from your local
repo to the master branch of the origin repo, effectively deleting it.
Regards,
Yawar
Geert Janssens wrote:
>On vrijdag 11 november 2011, Yawar Amin wrote:
>> Hi Geert,
>>
>
On vrijdag 11 november 2011, Yawar Amin wrote:
> Hi Geert,
>
> On 2011-11-11, at 11:47, Geert Janssens wrote:
> >> […]
> >
> > Is there a way to create a branch via the github interface ? Or do I have
> > to create one on my local repo and push it ? I didn't seem to find a
> > feature on the webs
Hi Geert,
On 2011-11-11, at 11:47, Geert Janssens wrote:
>> […]
> Is there a way to create a branch via the github interface ? Or do I have to
> create one on my local repo and push it ? I didn't seem to find a feature on
> the website, but perhaps I missed it. I'm not very comfortable yet with
On vrijdag 11 november 2011, John Ralls wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2011, at 6:16 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > On woensdag 9 november 2011, Yawar Amin wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Christian Stimming
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Same for me - I was able to
On Nov 11, 2011, at 6:16 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On woensdag 9 november 2011, Yawar Amin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Christian Stimming
>>
>> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>
>>> Same for me - I was able to "svn checkout" one of my other normal git
>>> repos,
>>> but with
On woensdag 9 november 2011, Yawar Amin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Christian Stimming
>
> wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >
> > Same for me - I was able to "svn checkout" one of my other normal git
> > repos,
> > but with gnucash I, too, got "502 Bad Gateway". However, it came up w
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Christian Stimming
wrote:
> [...]
>
>
> Same for me - I was able to "svn checkout" one of my other normal git
> repos,
> but with gnucash I, too, got "502 Bad Gateway". However, it came up with a
> "trunk" and "branches" directory, so that I had to append "trun
Am Mittwoch, 9. November 2011 schrieb John Ralls:
> On Nov 9, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > On maandag 7 november 2011, Geert Janssens wrote:
> >> On maandag 7 november 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
> >>> If we decided to move not only to git, but also to github, we'd solve
> >>> mo
On Nov 9, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On maandag 7 november 2011, Geert Janssens wrote:
>> On maandag 7 november 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
>>> If we decided to move not only to git, but also to github, we'd solve
>>> most of the build script integration issues: github offers t
On maandag 7 november 2011, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On maandag 7 november 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
> > If we decided to move not only to git, but also to github, we'd solve
> > most of the build script integration issues: github offers the
> > additional feature of accessing its git repos al
On Nov 8, 2011, at 5:01 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> John Ralls writes:
>
>> I actually like the interface on git.gnome.org better than github's
>> (or trac's). Less froo-froo, and the history is a lot more readable
>> and searchable. OTOH, I do like the line-by-line comment feature on
>> Github.
Geert Janssens writes:
> I'm not sure where the docs and doxygen nightly build scripts live. Perhaps
> Derek can answer that.
It's a cron job from a local script.
> The website update is done as part of a commit hook on the gnucash svn
> server. This pushes each website related commit through
John Ralls writes:
>>> I think only the website set-up needs some more work. All other
>>> integration only depends on the availability of a svn checkout, which
>>> would already be there on github.
>>>
>> The website and the mails that get automatically sent to gnucash-patches and
>> gnucash-c
On maandag 7 november 2011, Yawar Amin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Christian Stimming
>
> wrote:
> > Zitat von Derek Atkins :
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>> [...]
> >>>
> >>> The windows automatic build scripts
> >>> still depend on svn and won't work with git.
> >>
> >> Right no
Hi,
On Mon, November 7, 2011 4:58 pm, Yawar Amin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Christian Stimming
> wrote:
>
>> Zitat von Derek Atkins :
>>
>>> [...]
>
[...]
The windows automatic build scripts
still depend on svn and won't work with git.
>>>
>
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Christian Stimming
wrote:
> Zitat von Derek Atkins :
>
>> [...]
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> The windows automatic build scripts
>>> still depend on svn and won't work with git.
>>>
>>
>> Right now the web site update, docs nightly build script, doxygen nightly
On Nov 7, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On maandag 7 november 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
>> Zitat von Derek Atkins :
> We've been using the Github repos pretty successfully for 8 months or
> so now. I think all of the main committers this year (meaning more
> than a
On maandag 7 november 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Zitat von Derek Atkins :
> >>> We've been using the Github repos pretty successfully for 8 months or
> >>> so now. I think all of the main committers this year (meaning more
> >>> than a commit or so per month ) are using it. Meanwhile, Derek
On Nov 7, 2011, at 5:04 AM, Yawar Amin wrote:
>
> On 2011-11-07, at 04:54, Christian Stimming wrote:
>
>>> […]
>>
>> My suggestion is to move the main git repo also to a github one, and not
>> maintaining our own source code server. My reasons for this is an easier
>> administration of addin
On 2011-11-07, at 04:54, Christian Stimming wrote:
>> […]
>
> My suggestion is to move the main git repo also to a github one, and not
> maintaining our own source code server. My reasons for this is an easier
> administration of adding main commit access, and also a much easier handing
> ove
Zitat von Derek Atkins :
We've been using the Github repos pretty successfully for 8 months or so
now. I think all of the main committers this year (meaning more than a
commit or so per month ) are using it. Meanwhile, Derek has upgraded the
servers and moved them to a new location, so there shou
69 matches
Mail list logo