It's been rumoured that Conrad Canterford said:
> Would require a rethink of how things are set out on the register (and
> possibly a significant rewrite,particularly for my more ambitious
> suggestions).
actually, shouldn't. Most of the actual register layout is specified
in one file, which bas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was thinking the other day on how to implement an a/r a/p register.
> One thing that the register needs is a per-transaction 'date due'
> field. (yes, there are other possible sol'ns but bear with me).
> Well, we could hard-wire the date-due field into a new account ty
Forwarded message:
>
> Modified Files:
> register.scm
> Log Message:
> Add memo & action field.
I was thinking the other day on how to implement an a/r a/p register.
One thing that the register needs is a per-transaction 'date due'
field. (yes, there are other possible sol'ns but bear wi
