Christopher Browne writes:
> I think you're right; the "way of doing something more sophisticated"
> needs to be thought through further.
gnucash does not need to be a word processing package. IMHO, there is
no need for reporting to be built into gnucash. As long as the
current dataset is ava
tries,
> in the one syntax. Either we approach them as semantically
> independent concept and provide two different syntaxes for doing
> them, or we come up with a syntax that suits both.
Indeed. *Good* point.
In effect, we need to be able to
table
formatting, which is not *quite* what we're doing, although the
difference may be a bit awkward to describe.
> I've checked my LaTeX books, and this is a reasonably good match for
> the line-drawing commands for the tabular styles. I don't know
> whether this can be
