> On Feb 27, 2016, at 9:34 AM, Geert Janssens
> wrote:
>
Some independent commits are on the next branch.
>
> I didn't realize "next" was actually the name of a branch. I read it to mean
> "some other branch
> with follow-up commits to be merged afterwards".
>
> I looked at the next br
> On Feb 27, 2016, at 9:34 AM, Geert Janssens
> wrote:
>
>> I'm really not a distributions expert, but wouldn't Debian for example
>> wait anyway before picking up a version 3.0.0? I thought they would
>> probably stay with the latest stable series anyway.
>>
> True. However there are also the
> On Feb 27, 2016, at 8:15 AM, Tobias Markus wrote:
>
> On Mo, 2016-02-22 at 22:57 +0100, Geert Janssens wrote:
>>
>>> * I ported the core application code to use GtkApplication. It would be
>>> nice to change the main window - opened file relationship from the
>>> current N:1 to a 1:1, i
On Saturday 27 February 2016 17:15:56 Tobias Markus wrote:
> On Mo, 2016-02-22 at 22:57 +0100, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > A few general suggestions:
> > 1. Better commit messages. Each commit message should summarize what
> > the commit does.
> > 2. Make changes as atomic as possible. One commit sho
On Saturday 27 February 2016 14:32:41 Tobias Markus wrote:
> On Mo, 2016-02-22 at 21:18 -0800, John Ralls wrote:
> > > On Feb 22, 2016, at 1:57 PM, Geert Janssens
> > > > >
> > > t.be> wrote:
> > > > Major changes already in my tree:
> > > > * All "rich" GtkActions/GtkRadioActions/GtkToggleAction
On Mo, 2016-02-22 at 22:57 +0100, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> For some reason I missed your original announcement. Your reply to
> John made me find it.
>
> Anyway...
Hi Geert,
thanks for your feedback, I appreciate it.
>
> First off, thanks for the effort you have spent so far
> On Feb 27, 2016, at 5:32 AM, Tobias Markus wrote:
> I have to disagree here:
...
>
>
> There is a simple benefit: GnuCash (currently) is a GTK+ application,
> and there is no reason why it shouldn't use a feature that improves
> integration with the desktop. If you don't like GApplication and
> On Feb 27, 2016, at 5:32 AM, Tobias Markus wrote:
>
> On Mo, 2016-02-22 at 21:18 -0800, John Ralls wrote:
> I have to disagree here:
>
> WebKit2 sounds like a huge step, but it really isn't. As one of the
> last things before releasing the patchset, I tried to convert gnc-html-
> webkit to We
On Mi, 2016-02-24 at 22:26 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Montag, 22. Februar 2016, 23:42:24 schrieb Geert Janssens:
> >
> > >
> > > The reason why I suggested Vala instead of C++/gtkmm is that Vala
> > > is a
> > > 1:1 match to the GObject system, and while gtkmm code is
> > > certainly
>
On Mo, 2016-02-22 at 21:18 -0800, John Ralls wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 22, 2016, at 1:57 PM, Geert Janssens > t.be> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Major changes already in my tree:
> > > * All "rich" GtkActions/GtkRadioActions/GtkToggleActions were
> > > replaced
> > > by abstract GActions/GMenus. This doe
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> ...If we can remove glib, guile, and other
> dependencies and leave it purely at C++ (and arguably boost), I think it
> would go a long way to making it easier to port the engine to alternate
> platforms like Android and iOS that would req
Am Montag, 22. Februar 2016, 21:03:30 schrieb John Ralls:
> Cutecash is a demo. It implements only part of GnuCash and while Christian
> tidies things up periodically to keep it working it has never become a
> serious alternative to Gtk. I think that that's because of the MVC
> violations I mention
On Wed, February 24, 2016 4:26 pm, Christian Stimming wrote:
> I agree that porting from GObject to C++ is a step forward. However, by
> now I
> have my doubts whether that effort is actually well invested anymore.
> Geert,
> are you sure we said C++ would help in "portability to mobile platforms
Am Montag, 22. Februar 2016, 23:42:24 schrieb Geert Janssens:
> > The reason why I suggested Vala instead of C++/gtkmm is that Vala is a
> > 1:1 match to the GObject system, and while gtkmm code is certainly
> > easier to write that pure GTK+/C code, they aren't really a perfect
> > match.
>
> Tha
Hi Tobias,
thanks for the interesting work on the gnucash application! I've seen the
other replies here, but I would like to add some remarks to your proposals
with a somewhat different direction:
Am Sonntag, 21. Februar 2016, 20:12:58 schrieb Tobias Markus:
> While I got GnuCash pretty much wo
> On Feb 22, 2016, at 1:57 PM, Geert Janssens
> wrote:
>
>> Major changes already in my tree:
>> * All "rich" GtkActions/GtkRadioActions/GtkToggleActions were replaced
>> by abstract GActions/GMenus. This doesn't sound like a lot, but is a
>> major change. Please read the relevant API documenta
> On Feb 22, 2016, at 9:56 AM, Tobias Markus wrote:
>
> On So, 2016-02-21 at 13:22 -0800, John Ralls wrote:
>>>
>>> On Feb 21, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Tobias Markus
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi GnuCash developers,
>>>
>>> over the last few feeks, I have developed a fundamental patchset
>>> that
>>> shou
On Monday 22 February 2016 18:56:24 Tobias Markus wrote:
> On So, 2016-02-21 at 13:22 -0800, John Ralls wrote:
> > > On Feb 21, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Tobias Markus
> > > wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Dear Tobias,
> >
> > That's a huge amount of work, but it's a bit too far-reaching to be
> > considered a p
Hi Tobias,
For some reason I missed your original announcement. Your reply to John made me
find it.
Anyway...
First off, thanks for the effort you have spent so far to migrate gnucash to
gtk+3. I gather this is
a huge job (and the size of your branch confirms this).
I agree with John we have
On So, 2016-02-21 at 13:22 -0800, John Ralls wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 21, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Tobias Markus
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi GnuCash developers,
> >
> > over the last few feeks, I have developed a fundamental patchset
> > that
> > should get GnuCash up and running in GTK+ 3.
> >
> > The sourc
> On Feb 21, 2016, at 11:12 AM, Tobias Markus wrote:
>
> Hi GnuCash developers,
>
> over the last few feeks, I have developed a fundamental patchset that
> should get GnuCash up and running in GTK+ 3.
>
> The source code is available at GitHub:
> https://github.com/hesiod/gnucash/tree/gtk3
>
Hi GnuCash developers,
over the last few feeks, I have developed a fundamental patchset that
should get GnuCash up and running in GTK+ 3.
The source code is available at GitHub:
https://github.com/hesiod/gnucash/tree/gtk3
Some independent commits are on the next branch. All GTK+ 3-related
stuff
22 matches
Mail list logo
