But gtk 3.20+ accepts the . so for simplicity I suggest that the example should
keep it. Perhaps we could add a comment in it saying that it's optional for
gtk+-3.20.0 and later.
Regards,
John Ralls
> On Jul 10, 2018, at 12:27 PM, Geert Janssens
> wrote:
>
> The . is only required for gtk3
The . is only required for gtk3 less than 3.20. Before that version gtk doesn't
understand widget names. So for compatibility Bob added classes. That
workaround will eventually go away.
Perhaps we should mention both in the css file with a comment or provide two
sample css files. I *thought* w
