But gtk 3.20+ accepts the . so for simplicity I suggest that the example should 
keep it. Perhaps we could add a comment in it saying that it's optional for 
gtk+-3.20.0 and later.

Regards,
John Ralls


> On Jul 10, 2018, at 12:27 PM, Geert Janssens <geert.gnuc...@kobaltwit.be> 
> wrote:
> 
> The . is only required for gtk3 less than 3.20. Before that version gtk 
> doesn't understand widget names. So for compatibility Bob added classes. That 
> workaround will eventually go away. 
> 
> Perhaps we should mention both in the css file with a comment or provide two 
> sample css files. I *thought* we had two even.
> 
> Regards, 
> Geert
> 
> John Ralls <jra...@code.gnucash.org> schreef op 10 juli 2018 16:12:35 CEST:
>> Updated       via  https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/e6ea84ba
>> (commit)
>>      from  https://github.com/Gnucash/gnucash/commit/38748f20 (commit)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> commit e6ea84ba5830b38121aa927d4373f956b9accfa2
>> Author: John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us>
>> Date:   Tue Jul 10 07:12:21 2018 -0700
>> 
>>   Fix missing leading dot in sheet specification.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Summary of changes:
>> doc/gtk-3.0.css | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnucash-patches mailing list
>> gnucash-patc...@gnucash.org
>> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-patches
> 
> Sent from my smartphone. Please excuse my brevity.
> _______________________________________________
> gnucash-devel mailing list
> gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
> https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel

Reply via email to