> Thus I claim that the 'right' implementation would be a kernel module
> (so that its not breakable even if the root shell has been compromised,
> which is something lomac protects against). The kernel module would
> work with some appropriate set of authentication mechanisms to
> verify the trus
> There is no secret conspiracy hiding release dates, we just haven't
> made any yet. We have to look at what we want in 1.8 before we set
> a hard date for it.
Dave,
Just a heads up,
The company that I work for and I have decided to make
an amicable split. This will happen shortly, pro
To everyone,
Can we please refrain from using the word die for a
week or so. I've got a friend that I work with here
in Tempe Arizona by the name of Russell Burrough who
just started to talk about such things and then
rambles about Monday 6.25.2001. This is giving me a
real bad feeling abo
As someone who also uses and is very fond of the
Paytrust system, all that I would ask is that security
be given very serious consideration. Having my bills
sent to another address is somewhat of a relief as I
don't have to worry about someone breaking into my
mailbox in the physical world and wo
Rainer Koenig wrote:
> On 0, Alan Orndorff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >For a while now I've been saving my register file on a DVD-RAM
> > drive. Any app other than Gnucash can write directly to the DVD-RAM
> > drive but for Gn
Only real advice I can give you is become great friends with
the truss command and see whats missing. Use truss to create
an output file -o /some_file_name and then grep/vi/more/whatever
through it and look for ENOENT, Error No Entry or in other words
File not found. It will also show you which
> On Sun, 20 May 2001 19:58:44 -0700, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
rob> I realize that the memory footprint would be HUGE, but for as
rob> un-often as Alan runs gnucash, and the time he has put into it
>sorry, didn't mean to presume, but I figure that gnucash is still in
>the "application
Phillip Shelton wrote:
> > > Most of the above are basically the result of using a nearly complete
> > > gnome environment. The only exceptions I see are tar, textutils, gcc,
> > > make, sed and texinfo. I'm not sure on the ghostscript thing.
> > > ...
> > As stated previously, Solaris ships wi
> Alan> Berkeley_db Glib Gnomelibs Gtk Imlib Orbit
> Alan> readline tar textutils gcc guile
> Alan> make sed texinfo gal-0.5.tar.gz
> Alan> ghostscript-fonts-std-6.0.tar.gz libunicode-0.4.tar.gz
> Alan> GConf-1.0.0.tar.gz gdk-pixbuf-0.10.1.tar.gz
> Alan> gnome-print-0.28.tar.gz libxml-1.8.1
Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
> OK, below is a list of all the requirements I can *currently* think of for
> building
> and running gnucash 1.5.x, soon to be gnucash 1.6. Feel free to flame for
> errors
> and omissions :)
>
forgot about these as well:
Giflib JpegPng TiffXpm Zli
Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
> OK, below is a list of all the requirements I can *currently* think of for
> building
> and running gnucash 1.5.x, soon to be gnucash 1.6. Feel free to flame for
> errors
> and omissions :)
>
Here's my list:
Berkeley_db
Glib
Gnomelibs
Gtk
Imlib
Orbit
autoconf
biso
Much cheaper than Quicken but a bit more work to obtain. Install Gnome
Libs
first, I used 1.2, 1.4 had some probs. After that, obtain and compile
the following:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root other1009630 Apr 8 02:05 GConf-1.0.0.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root other1634634 Apr 8 00:06
Guppi-
> Which means I won't be running it. I was disappointed when I read an
> article about this and saw gnucash dissed. I know gnucash isn't as
> polished as quicken (yet), but it hasn't been in development for 10+
> years, either. And since nobody has even seen kapital, we really don't
> know where
Ok, now I'm getting:
checking for dbopen... no
checking for dbopen in -ldb1... no
checking for dbopen in -ldb... yes
checking for db_185.h... no
checking for db1/db.h... no
configure: error: Berkeley db library required for GnuCash
Press any key to continue...
Berkeley 2.7.7 with 1.85 compat is
Hi all,
I was thinking about playing with the 1.5x branch and seeing what's
new, so
I went over to the web site and its changed a bit. What is the current
developemnt
version, where can I get it, and what other libraries am I going to need
to
compile up ahead of time? If it compiles I'll tar
Not sure what other people will think, BUT...
A while ago I asked if it would be possible to have a Quicken
feature added to Gnucash. Basically, if you schedule transactions
into the future, Gnucash will show the future balance and not
the current balance. Quicken will show both.
I actually st
Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
> Jean-Claude Magras writes:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I have installed GNOME under DtLogin on Solaris7. I might be willing to
> > pkgadd' them together if this does not violate IBM work rules
> > 'art-for-hire'.
> > But I want to know if all the GNU stuff(includin
Please reply via direct email and not the list
if your so inclined.
I had a friend make up the cd's for Suse Linux
on Sparc's. If I ever manage to get a valid
keyboard driver and then compile Gnucash,
will it work for all Sparc based Linux environments
or would it be valid only for Suse?
than
> Have your been able to get a good copy of gnome-core library?
> The copy of the source found on gnome.org is corrupt.. gnutar 1.13,
> solaris 2.7 (mu4) tar and star report a problem with "././@LongLink".
> AIX 4.3.3 also says there is a problem.
I have it all, gnome-libs, gnome-core, gnome thi
Dave Peticolas wrote:
>
> is released.
>
> It contains fixes for Solaris, for gnome-print 0.23, and misc fixes.
>
> dave
all works as indicated
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash
price to $50,000.
Barbara: I'm being marked down? Oh, God, I've been
kidnapped by K-Mart!
Alan Orndorff writes:
> On Thu, 21 September 2000, Dave Peticolas wrote:
>
> >
> > What version of gnome-print do you have?
> >
> > dave
>
>
Charles,
If you untar 1.51 to a clean directory and try and
compile it, does it work for you. I've been able
to recreate your first post and haven't gotten around it.
Did you untar 1.51 overtop of 1.50 or was it a
nonexistant directory?
thanks,
alan
__
Dave Peticolas wrote:
>
> Alan Orndorff writes:
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > I just uploaded and then redownloaded Gnucash 1.4.6
> > for Solaris. All went well. Let me know when you
> > move it so I can test it again.
>
> It's on the ftp site now.
>
David Proulx wrote:
>
> I downloaded both of the Solaris 8 binary packages from
> http://www.linas.org/pub/gnucash/gnucash/solaris-8
> and cannot unzip them. "gunzip" complains:
>
> > gunzip GNUcash.1.4.3.Solaris.8.Sparc.tar.gz
>
> gunzip: GNUcash.1.4.3.Solaris.8.Sparc.tar.gz: invalid compresse
David Proulx wrote:
>
> I downloaded both of the Solaris 8 binary packages from
> http://www.linas.org/pub/gnucash/gnucash/solaris-8
> and cannot unzip them. "gunzip" complains:
>
> > gunzip GNUcash.1.4.3.Solaris.8.Sparc.tar.gz
>
> gunzip: GNUcash.1.4.3.Solaris.8.Sparc.tar.gz: invalid compresse
Ed Porras wrote:
> In one message or another, Adrian Cox said something like this:
> >I've just got 1.4.3 from Helixcode, and the reconciliation problem
> >that stopped me using 1.4.0 is still present. I've imported a large
> >number of QIF files from Quicken 6 SE, and all the data is in the
> >r
Running Gnucash 1.4.1 Gnome version,
Open checking account,type in the date, type in the type, select
a memorized account by typing the first couple letters and then
press "tab" after autofill fills in the rest and then :
gnucash
/usr/local/share/gnucash/scm/engine-interface.scm:241:11: In expre
Dave Peticolas wrote:
> Wesley Hosking writes:
> > When trying to compile up 1.40 (from the tarball) - I get the
> > following (On a Sparc Linux machine running rh6.2 ) :
> >
> > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I.. -I../engine -I../gnome -I../re
> > gister-g -O2 -Wall -I/usr/inclu
Dave Peticolas wrote:
> Alan Orndorff writes:
> > Reports now work on Solaris under Gnucash 1.40, so I pulled up
> > Profit/Loss and then looked at "Net." Not a pretty number, can
> > someone fix this? :-)
>
> First you have to tell us what's wrong :
Reports now work on Solaris under Gnucash 1.40, so I pulled up
Profit/Loss and then looked at "Net." Not a pretty number, can
someone fix this? :-)
thanks,
alan
--
Solaris Ultra/Intel Resources - http://www.mindspring.com/~dwarfie
When you open your Windows you'll see a light blue sky
filled wi
Dave Peticolas wrote:
> Does it happen when you click the button or when you hit 'Ok/Apply'?
> What is the error message?
click on apply then ok, all is well, double click on checking register and
then
a popup windows comes up with:
Application "gnucash" process 553 has crashed due to a fatal
Now to make Dave sorry that he got me up on Gnucash :-)
Moved everything out of Quicken and into Gnucash. Qif importer
was pretty impressive. It did add my opening Visa as both a debit
and a credit so my balance was off by that amount. Deleted both
entries and put one back and then my checking
HI Dave,
Thanks for the tip. I spent the some time this weekend making sure I
had the latest
of everything when I was compiling up Gnome Libs. Then when I got to
Gnucash
for some reason I stopped checking for the "latest and greatest."
Moving up
to Guile 1.3.4 did the trick. No errors and a co
Hi all,
Thought I'd try this again with the gnome version. I am getting
the following:
bash-2.03# make gnome SHELL=/usr/bin/bash
make gnome.real
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/gnucash-1.3.8'
make FLAVOR=gnome build-flavor
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/gnucash-1.3.8'
make[3]: Entering
> The guile tarball I got has no such file and the slib docs don't say anything
> about guile. Given that all I want to do is run gnucash and don't
> particularly care about doing anything fancy with guile/slib, can I just
> copy the scm files someplace where guile will find them? or do I need to
Hi All,
After looking thru the truss output the program was not finding
require.scm. After moving it and few other files around and removing
those two entries per Linas I managed to clean up the .scm startup
errors.
For some reason I chose the Lesstif version that causes the fast
blinking
Dave Peticolas wrote:
>
> > gnucash: bootstrap file is /usr/local/share/gnucash/scm/bootstrap.scm
> > gnucash: [W] "failure loading ""/usr/local/share/gnucash/scm/prefs.scm"
> > gnucash: [W] "failure loading
> > ""/usr/local/share/gnucash/scm/text-export.scm"
> > ERROR: Unbound variable: gnc:*con
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> It's been rumoured that Alan Orndorff said:
> > > > (cd /usr/local/bin && ln -sf gnucash.motif gnucash)
> > > > ln: cannot create gnucash: File exists
> > >
> > > ln -s on other unixes means 'symbol
> I don't know what this error is but my guess is that solaris
> make is not compatible with gnu make. Try specifying gmake instead.
# which make
/usr/local/bin/make
which will tell you which binary is being run according to your path
statement. in this case, /usr/local/bin/make is gmake, the
This bites.
Last time I did a successful make I also did
a successful make install, not this time.
This is using 1.25 from the gnucash ftp server
# make install SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash
./install-sh -c -d /usr/local/bin /usr/local/lib/gnucash
/usr/local/doc/gnucash /usr/local/share/gnucash
# Pu
I have managed to compile up Gnucash 1.25 on Solaris/Intel.
The same steps that Rob helped me with before still apply, and
am posting back to the list in case someone else wants to try
this at home.
in /src/motif/makefile
If you want to get further before we have a chance to fix this, you
could
Jeremy Collins wrote:
>
> Alan Orndorff wrote:
> >
> > Dave Peticolas wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Gnucash Gnome 1.3.0 Beta Release 1
> > > > Gnucash 1.3.0 Beta Release 1
> > > > Gnucash 1.4.0 Beta Release 1
> > >
Dave Peticolas wrote:
>
>
> > Gnucash Gnome 1.3.0 Beta Release 1
> > Gnucash 1.3.0 Beta Release 1
> > Gnucash 1.4.0 Beta Release 1
>
> I vote for one of the above, probably one of the first two.
> I think a beta release is important and it should be more
> than just the people who can do CVS.
David O'Brien wrote:
> > As long as you have /usr/local before /usr/ccs/bin in your path
> > statement, your fine on Solaris.
>
> As a followup, what happens when /usr/ccs/bin is 1st in the path, and the
> user knows this. Thus they do:
>
> cd gnucash-x.yz
> /usr/local/bin/make
>
> the b
David O'Brien wrote:
> On both Solaris and BSD /usr/bin/make is not GNU's make. When GNU's make
> is installed on these systems it is most often named gmake. The actual
> name does not matter as the invoker knows what he called it.
I'm having a hard time following this. On Solaris that I've w
Jim Hofmann wrote:
> When I execute gnucash 1.2.3, I get the error message
>
> gnucash: bootstrap file is
> /usr/local/opt/gnucash/share/gnucash/scm/bootstrap.scm
> ERROR: In procedure gsubr-apply in expression (scm-error (quote
> misc-error) #f ...):
> ERROR: Could not find slib/require.scm in
>
"James A. Treacy" wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 01:41:39AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > The reasons that swap spaces are perenially partitions and not
> > flat files are due partly to historical hysteria and partly
> > administrative admonitions.
> >
> [snip]
>
> Having swap on it's
> personally I don't care if you use Slackware, completely recompiled to
> use .deb packages on top of a modified FreeBSD kernel on your kitchen
> toaster.
I'll sell you mine for four monthly payments of just $19.99 on this
t.v. special.
alan!
- %< --
Rob Browning wrote:
> Alan Orndorff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ok, Maybe Debian's a better way to go, for me.
>
> Depends on what you want.
>
> According to many, the learning curve's steeper for Debian, but the
> long-term maintainability&
> They're not. Debian, for example, doesn't force you to have a swap
> partition at install at all. It suggests one, but you can ignore it
> and set up swap files later to your hearts content. It's just RedHat
> that he says requires one at install time.
Ok, Maybe Debian's a better way to go,
> Actually Linux has been able to use files for a LONG
> time now. The
> problem is that as recently as Redhat 5.2 (and maybe
> even 6.0) it still
> REQUIRES the configuration of a swap partition in
> order to install. The
> reason? Because RedHat says that's better.
> Absolutely nothing more
> > No way. I'm shooting for the 9 GB IBM Ultra Star
> 10,000 rpm,
> > ultra 2 scsi, I will never buy IDE again for my
> home system.
> >
> > Then I'll need to replace my 2940W with a newer
> Adaptec,
> > so its going to be a while still.
>
> I'd highly recommend the Buslogic (now Mylex)
> card
> Yep, and 10GB IBM IDE drives are pretty cheap these days. About $150
> for $160 for the 7200RPM version..
No way. I'm shooting for the 9 GB IBM Ultra Star 10,000 rpm,
ultra 2 scsi, I will never buy IDE again for my home system.
Then I'll need to replace my 2940W with a newer Adaptec,
so its
Rob Browning wrote:
> Alan Orndorff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > to Unix. Its providing Windows like apps for Unix. It still has
> > some things that I don't like, like the need for a seperate
> > partition just for swap.
>
> FWIW, linux allows y
Hi All,
With much help from the Gnucash development team, I've finally
managed to cobble together a working version of Gnucash on
Solaris/Intel. From http://www.gnucash.org:
GnuCash (previously known as X-Accountant) is a personal finance accounting
application. The project goals are to crea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's been rumoured that Alan Orndorff said:
> >The one thing I know about binutils on Solaris systems is that
> > most admins don't like to install it. the ld that comes with binutils
> > does not compile on Solaris 7. Most
Rob Browning wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > libiberty comes with gcc, binutils and a number of other gnu tools
> > as a means of not having to rely on the vagaries of vendor libc
> > implmenetations.
>
> So is it installed with gcc on those platforms? If so, do you think
> it's reasona
Rob Browning wrote:
> Alan Orndorff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > /usr/local/lib/libiberty.a contains asprintf, so vi
> > /src/motif/Makefile and added -liberty to it, and got past that. I
> > can't remeber which gnu package compiles up libiberty but I
There are now, no unresolved dependancies.
/usr/local/lib/libiberty.a contains asprintf, so
vi /src/motif/Makefile and added -liberty to it,
and got past that. I can't remeber which gnu
package compiles up libiberty but I think it
was fileutils?
In gnucash.c changed stpcpy
to strcpy and got pas
Rob Browning wrote:
> Alan Orndorff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > setenv ../../src/guile/obj/gnucash.o
> > asprintf../../src/guile/obj/gnucash.o
> > stpcpy ../../src/e
> We just need to see if they're available anywhere on
> the system.
>
> > Not being installed right is the best option.
> XmHTML make doesn't have
> > a make install, I'll fuss with truss and see what
> I can find out.
>
> Is -lXmHTML showing up on the final link line? I
> don't recall.
Rob Browning wrote:
> Alan Orndorff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > setenv ../../src/guile/obj/gnucash.o
> > asprintf../../src/guile/obj/gnucash.o
> > stpcpy ../../src/e
> I should have said $(shell find ...) rather than $(find ...). Try
> that.
this bites. So close. That got rid of the bulk of the symbol problems
but a few remain. see below:
thanks!
alan
make FLAVOR=motif build-flavor
make[1]: Entering directory `/xacc'
make[2]: Entering directory `/xacc/li
> If you want to get further before we have a chance to fix this, you
> could just change those $(wildcard foo) statements to ($find -name
> "foo") statements in the Makefile.in files, re-run configure, then try
> to recompile.
>
> I haven't tested that, but it should work.
Must be my ignorance.
> When I get a chance, I'll see if I can hack our build process to not
> use wildcard on solaris machines. (Matt, do you want to do this?) We
> could probably just use $(shell find ) when we detect a
> solaris machine (better yet, we should test in configure for a broken
> wildcard). It'll be a
> OK, so according to Chris, Solaris might have a broken make that
> doesn't understand $(wildcard foo).
Ok, but I'm using GNU Make 3.77?!
> Let's test that. First, do your normal "configure and make motif",
> then create a file in src/motif called foo.makefile that contains
> this:
>
> OTHER
> > also, some of the scripts call /bin/sh, which on my system really is
> > bourne shell, so I did mv /bin/sh /bin/sh.save ln -s /usr/bin/bash
> > /bin/sh bash is 2.03
>
> Did you double check that by trying sh --version? (Not that I think
> that's the problem...)
>
> I'll go look at your makefi
A tad different.
from /xacc/src/motif
Makefile:
# Generated automatically from Makefile.in by
configure.
# Makefile -- makefile for gnucash/src/motif
# Copyright (C) 1997 Robin Clark
# Copyright (C) 1998 Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
#
> I assume you are building from CVS?
Yep
> If you're getting the source from a source tarball, you shouldn't need
> autoconf, automake or libtool (so you may have found a bug).
Ok, Installed libtool and now get:
make FLAVOR=motif build-flavor
make[1]: Entering directory `/xacc'
make[2]: Enter
Please remember that people with other unix based OS's are trying to get
this darn program to compile as well. If you could include some
instructions on how to install slibc that don't include, get rpm xyz.rpm and
install it, that would be useful to others as well.
Jeremy Collins wrote:
> Mat
Hi All,
Hopefully someone can help me with this. I'm not a c programmer
so don't claim to know much about what's going on. I'm trying
to get this to work with Solaris 7 on Intel. Still can't get
1.1.26 configure script to find guile, so am working with 1.1.25.
Start the configure scrip
Hate to post this again, but when running the configure script for
gnucash,
and its doing the check for guile, what the heck is it looking for, and
how
do I point configure to it. I've set GUILE_LoAD_PATH, have tried
--with-guile-config=/usr/local/bin
--with-guile=/usr/local which worked with
teri wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a pretty hard time getting gnucash 1.1.26 to even configure with
> all the accessory programs it needs. The point where I'm stuck now is
> guile. I've installed guile in /usr/local. The ld.so.conf file knows
> about /usr/local/lib and I've done an ldconfig.
73 matches
Mail list logo
