Re: Bugzilla default/QA assignees

2013-02-18 Thread John Ralls
On Feb 18, 2013, at 5:43 PM, Chris Shoemaker wrote: > +1 ;) Well, well. Don't you get stiff lurking behind that fern? ;-) Regards, John Ralls [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced;bug_status=UNCONFIRMED;bug_status=NEW;bug_status=ASSIGNED;bug_status=REOPENED;bug_st

Re: Bugzilla default/QA assignees

2013-02-18 Thread Chris Shoemaker
+1 ;) On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 05:09:20PM -0800, John Ralls wrote: > The default assignee field is mostly used to determine who gets bugmail for a > particular component. Some of the assignments make sense, like having me be > the default for Mac bugs, some not so much, like Chris Shoemaker for b

Bugzilla default/QA assignees

2013-02-18 Thread John Ralls
The default assignee field is mostly used to determine who gets bugmail for a particular component. Some of the assignments make sense, like having me be the default for Mac bugs, some not so much, like Chris Shoemaker for budget bugs: He hasn't been around for a long time. It also makes it har

Re: Gnucash 2.5/6

2013-02-18 Thread John Ralls
On Feb 18, 2013, at 6:50 AM, Mike Evans wrote: > On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:55:40 -0800 (PST) > Phil Longstaff wrote: > >> I created https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694047 and >> attached an initial patch to that. That should allow you to get it >> in. I'll need to learn more about gi

Re: Gnucash 2.5/6

2013-02-18 Thread Mike Evans
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:55:40 -0800 (PST) Phil Longstaff wrote: > I created https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694047 and > attached an initial patch to that.  That should allow you to get it > in.  I'll need to learn more about git. > > Phil > > > > Fr