On Dec 11, 2011, at 6:22 PM, David Reiser wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2011, at 3:02 PM, David Reiser wrote:
>
>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 2:47 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 11:30 AM, David Reiser wrote:
>>>
On Dec 11, 2011, at 1:41 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On De
On Dec 11, 2011, at 3:02 PM, David Reiser wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2011, at 2:47 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 11:30 AM, David Reiser wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 1:41 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>>>
On Dec 10, 2011, at 10:23 PM, David Reiser wrote:
>
>
Am Sonntag, 11. Dezember 2011, 21:53:46 schrieb Geert Janssens:
> Op zondag 11 december 2011 10:16:15 schreef John Ralls:
> > On Dec 11, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > > Just for clarity, I did understand correctly that the 2.4.9 release
> > > is
> > > delayed because we want the versi
Op zondag 11 december 2011 10:16:15 schreef John Ralls:
> On Dec 11, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> > Just for clarity, I did understand correctly that the 2.4.9 release is
> > delayed because we want the version checking and basic feature checking
> > included, right ?
>
> That's the q
On Dec 11, 2011, at 2:47 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2011, at 11:30 AM, David Reiser wrote:
>
>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 1:41 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 10, 2011, at 10:23 PM, David Reiser wrote:
>>>
On Dec 11, 2011, at 12:39 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>
>>>
On Dec 11, 2011, at 11:30 AM, David Reiser wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2011, at 1:41 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 10, 2011, at 10:23 PM, David Reiser wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 12:39 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>>>
On Dec 10, 2011, at 8:03 PM, David Reiser wrote:
>
On Dec 11, 2011, at 1:41 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Dec 10, 2011, at 10:23 PM, David Reiser wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 12:39 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 10, 2011, at 8:03 PM, David Reiser wrote:
>>>
r21708 fixed my build problem (thanks John), but gnucash fails to
On Dec 11, 2011, at 9:57 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> Just for clarity, I did understand correctly that the 2.4.9 release is
> delayed
> because we want the version checking and basic feature checking included,
> right ?
That's the question I asked, and I held off bumping and tagging yesterday
On Dec 10, 2011, at 10:23 PM, David Reiser wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2011, at 12:39 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>
>>
>> On Dec 10, 2011, at 8:03 PM, David Reiser wrote:
>>
>>> r21708 fixed my build problem (thanks John), but gnucash fails to launch
>>> with:
>>>
>>> Backtrace:
>>> In unknown file:
>>
Just for clarity, I did understand correctly that the 2.4.9 release is delayed
because we want the version checking and basic feature checking included,
right ?
Geert
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/ma
10 matches
Mail list logo