--On January 5, 2011 2:12:06 PM -0500 Derek Atkins
wrote:
I understand the "I like git, so everyone should use it" mentality.
I'm trying to make sure we don't move over to git only because of
that. I want to make sure there are real technical reasons to spend
the time and effort to not only m
On Jan 5, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> John Ralls writes:
>
>> I also started a straight git svn clone, which stopped mysteriously
>> about the same place. I just restarted it.
>
> What's the bottleneck in doing the conversion?
This time I kept a tee-file of the output, but I didn
Progress...
Setting Importance to High. I think this only affects maverick, as the
build in natty runs the full test suite for mysql, pgsql, and sqlite3
and does not report this failure.
** Changed in: libdbi-drivers (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notificat
Hi All,
The GnuCash docs have failed to build the last few days. I decided to
take a few minutes today to figure out why it failed, and here's what I
found. This failure only started a few days ago. Maybe someone could
look at it?
-derek
make[2]: Entering directory `/u1/home/gnucash/gnucash-d
I maintain my own, local git repository and have a mixed love/hare
relationship with git.
For me, I like the lightweight branching and merge capabilities. I like
the built-in bisection to locate introduced changes in result (generally
bugs, but sometimes enhancements as well). For local deve
Christian Stimming writes:
> Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2011 schrieb Jeff Kletsky:
>> In my opinion, since this is an OS-distribution-related problem rather
>> than a core-to-the-library problem, spending a lot of valuable dev time
>> on "fixing" it seems inappropriate.
>>
>> I would suggest somethi
Yawar Amin writes:
> Hi Derek,
>
> On 2011-01-03, at 11:53, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
>>> […]
>>
>> Apparently there are also issues with importing branches and tags
>> appropriately, as per John's other email.
>
> There is an issue in that git-svn imports branches and tags as remote
> refs (roughly
Matthijs Kooijman writes:
> Hey Derek,
>
> a few notes on this, from a patch submitter's point of view :-)
>
>> >> So.. Feel free to play with git. But don't expect your SHA history to
>> >> remain 100% complete or that the repo you create will at all resemble the
>> >> "offical" git repo, assu
John Ralls writes:
> On Jan 5, 2011, at 2:29 AM, Christian Stimming wrote:
>
>> Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2011 schrieb John Ralls:
>>> The second try stopped at r15521 for reasons that aren't entirely clear to
>>> me.
>>
>> This particular revision has nothing uncommon at all. I wouldn't understand
Hi, I hope this helps. Same guy "Jake Zhang" (jake.zh...@nic-web.org), same
day 3 Jan, same company "HORIY Trading, LLC". See the complete letter at
bottom.
On others mails(if you reply) the clear objective is scare and try to sell
all domains and brandname. Then, I just googling and find your
Hi,
on Wednesday 05 January 2011 12:47:32 Conrad Canterford wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:11 +, Colin Law wrote:
> > I think it is spam, see
> > http://www.firetrust.com/en/blog/chris/domain-name-scams
> > http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=140&f=2939&t=6890411
> > and others.
> > Colin
>
>
Its a hoax. I had the same thing with a domain that I own about a year ago, I
think I even recognise the names. Ignore it, it will go away.
David
On Wednesday 05 January 2011, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Is this a hoax, or is this true? I'd prefer if the project owns those
> domain names as co
On Jan 5, 2011, at 2:29 AM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2011 schrieb John Ralls:
>> The second try stopped at r15521 for reasons that aren't entirely clear to
>> me.
>
> This particular revision has nothing uncommon at all. I wouldn't understand
> why git-svn stops partic
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:11 +, Colin Law wrote:
> I think it is spam, see
> http://www.firetrust.com/en/blog/chris/domain-name-scams
> http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=140&f=2939&t=6890411
> and others.
> Colin
It is very definitely spam, and probably qualifies as a hoax, since
they're trying to
On 5 January 2011 10:52, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> Hey Christian,
>
>> Is this a hoax, or is this true? I'd prefer if the project owns those domain
>> names as compared to some whatever company owning them. Any thoughts?
> I seem to remember something similar to this from the OpenTTD project.
> R
Hey Christian,
> Is this a hoax, or is this true? I'd prefer if the project owns those domain
> names as compared to some whatever company owning them. Any thoughts?
I seem to remember something similar to this from the OpenTTD project.
Remko, from OpenTTD, responded to the email and the reply wa
Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2011 schrieb Jeff Kletsky:
> In my opinion, since this is an OS-distribution-related problem rather
> than a core-to-the-library problem, spending a lot of valuable dev time
> on "fixing" it seems inappropriate.
>
> I would suggest something along the lines of testing for th
Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2011 schrieb John Ralls:
> The second try stopped at r15521 for reasons that aren't entirely clear to
> me.
This particular revision has nothing uncommon at all. I wouldn't understand
why git-svn stops particularly there.
There are other SVN revisions which cause occasiona
Is this a hoax, or is this true? I'd prefer if the project owns those domain
names as compared to some whatever company owning them. Any thoughts?
Christian
Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2011 schrieb jake.zh...@asia-nic.com:
> (If you are not the person who is in charge of this, please forward to the
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
