Re: ofxdirectconnect in aqbanking3 branch

Hi Andreas, On Freitag, 11. Juli 2008, Andreas Köhler wrote: > On Do, 2008-07-10 at 00:09 +0200, Martin Preuss wrote: [...] > > So what I propose is this: You must already have a generic import/export > > interface which is able to import data from an AB_IMEXPORTER_CONTEXT, > > since you have an i

Re: SQL backend and dirty books

Hi Derek, I know you're not a fan of top posting, but that's how Yahoo mail does it. I assume that the only meaning to "dirty" is "in the engine but not yet saved to permanent storage". Part of my frustration is tripping over *magic* stuff that is not adequately documented. The dirty/clean st

Re: Feature proposal: shortened drop down list of accounts for entering transactions

Rolf Leggewie wrote: > OK, so let me ask you the still unanswered question about the number of > the accounts in your COA as well... And another rhetorical question: Do > you use a standardized COA or one that you devised yourself? > Basically, I know the answer to both questions... As you antici

Re: SQL backend and dirty books

Phil, Quoting Phil Longstaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I've investigated my transaction/split issue further and it appears > as though the problem is in how qof determines that the books are > dirty. > > There is an alt_dirty_mode flag in qof and the gc engine sets it to > TRUE. When this flag i

SQL backend and dirty books

I've investigated my transaction/split issue further and it appears as though the problem is in how qof determines that the books are dirty. There is an alt_dirty_mode flag in qof and the gc engine sets it to TRUE. When this flag is set, *after* the backend is called during the second part of a

Re: Add tables to "bar chart" reports

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Joachim Herb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > a feature I missed for a long time is the ability to extend the bar chart > graphs with tables > containing the same information as the graph. > > I added this to the standard reports net-barchart.scm and > cate

Re: Add Additional Column to Register Report (PATCH INCLUDED)

On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Robert Stocks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, Attached is a new patch that implements the first part of this > suggestion. > This updates the register report, to include a memo option and > reprogram the description option > > Becasue this report picks up some sett

Re: ofxdirectconnect in aqbanking3 branch

Hi Martin, On Do, 2008-07-10 at 00:09 +0200, Martin Preuss wrote: > Hi, > > On Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2008, Martin Preuss wrote: > > On Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2008, Jerry Jaskierny wrote: > [...] > > Since GnuCash is directly looking for an AccountInfo object for the > > expected account number (in this ex

Re: Feature proposal: shortened drop down list of accounts for entering transactions

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Charles Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 1:14 AM, Jannick Asmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> entering transactions (e.g. in the General Ledger) all accounts are > >>

Re: Feature proposal: shortened drop down list of accounts for entering transactions

Derek Atkins wrote: > (or use something like the SKR04 tree) the full account names get > to be very big (and very repetative), so they often times overrun > the width of the drop-down. Should be fixed with the patch in bug 129099 ___ gnucash-devel mail

Re: Feature proposal: shortened drop down list of accounts for entering transactions

Rolf Leggewie wrote: > still unanswered question I have to concede that * Derek did answer the question * I am not reading my mail in a timely fashion the numbers for Germany are at least by a factor of five to ten higher (although Derek seems to use an impressive amount of accounts) __

Re: Feature proposal: shortened drop down list of accounts for entering transactions

"Charles Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 1:14 AM, Jannick Asmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> entering transactions (e.g. in the General Ledger) all accounts are >> offered in the drop down list. Wouldn't it ease the use to offer just a >> shortened list of

Re: Feature proposal: shortened drop down list of accounts for entering transactions

Hi, Glen Ditchfield wrote: > I agree with Derek. OK, so let me ask you the still unanswered question about the number of the accounts in your COA as well. > Again, it helps if the names of > sibling accounts are unique in the first few characters. And another rhetorical question: Do you use a s

Re: Looks like the python bindings broke reports

Mark Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It looks like the python bindings break reports. When I run >> GnuCash from r17266 I have no problems, but when I run from >> r17285 I get a scheme backtrace from a report (sample included). > > The bug report for anyone interested is > http://bugzilla.

Re: Reporting: weighted average price source

Charles Day wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:58 AM, David G. Hamblen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Charles Day wrote: > > On Fri, Jul

Re: Feature proposal: shortened drop down list of accounts for entering transactions

On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 1:14 AM, Jannick Asmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > entering transactions (e.g. in the General Ledger) all accounts are > offered in the drop down list. Wouldn't it ease the use to offer just a > shortened list of 5, 10 or so account which were lately used? Certainl

Re: Reporting: weighted average price source

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:58 AM, David G. Hamblen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Charles Day wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:11 AM, David G. Hamblen < >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: >>> >

Re: Feature proposal: shortened drop down list of accounts for entering transactions

Jannick Asmus wrote: > entering transactions (e.g. in the General Ledger) all accounts are > offered in the drop down list. Wouldn't it ease the use to offer just a > shortened list of 5, 10 or so account which were lately used? Derek Atkins wrote: > I think it sounds like a HORRIBLE idea. 99% o

Re: Reporting: weighted average price source

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:58 AM, David G. Hamblen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Charles Day wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:11 AM, David G. Hamblen < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: >> > [snip] > >>Now that r17292 enables me to test things, the "Average Cost" on >

Re: Reporting: weighted average price source

Charles Day wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:11 AM, David G. Hamblen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > Charles Day wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Christian Stimming > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: Reporting: weighted average price source

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:11 AM, David G. Hamblen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Charles Day wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Christian Stimming <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >>Am Montag, 7. Juli 2008 18:42 schrieb Charles Day: >>> > So it's not a question

Re: Feature proposal: shortened drop down list of accounts for entering transactions

Jannick Asmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 10.07.2008 18:32, Rolf Leggewie wrote: >> Derek Atkins wrote: Sounds like a good idea, but ... >>> I think it sounds like a HORRIBLE idea. 99% of the time I already >>> know the account I want so I don't even USE the drop-down box. >> >> Let me

Re: Reporting: weighted average price source

Charles Day wrote: > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Am Montag, 7. Juli 2008 18:42 schrieb Charles Day: > > > So it's not a question of absolute values in bookkeeping. It's > > > a question of absolute val

Re: Looks like the python bindings broke reports

> It looks like the python bindings break reports. When I run > GnuCash from r17266 I have no problems, but when I run from > r17285 I get a scheme backtrace from a report (sample included). The bug report for anyone interested is http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542237 One report says