Charles Day wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Charles Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:58 AM, David G. Hamblen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Charles Day wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 5:11 AM, David G. Hamblen > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote: > > [snip] > > > Now that r17292 enables me to test things, the "Average > Cost" on > the balance sheet does what I think it should, except > when a > position is closed out (as in Derek's initial example > above). > With no current holdings in a stock, I get blanks for > that stock > and for the Total Assets, Liabilities, etc., just $ > signs. If I > unselect "Compute Unrealized Gains...", then the > Liabilities and > Equity section print properly, but the Assets total > remains blank. > Looks like a total somewhere is being skipped if > there's a funny > entry. I'll see what I can find. > > > "With no current holdings in a stock, I get blanks for > that stock" > > Could you explain a bit more, because this sounds > contradictory. If you have no current holdings of the > stock, then why is there even a line for it on your report? > > Because I accepted the defaults under Options|Accounts (in > the Balance Sheet report). If I manually unselect that stock, > All is well. Unselecting "Include accounts with zero total > balances" and "Omit zero balance figures" on the Display tab > doesn't make any difference. The other three commodity > options ("Weighted average", "Nearest in Time", and "Most > Recent") do what I expected (i.e, the stock doesn't show, and > the totals are printed). > > > Ah, I see... the line should be zero and isn't. Forgot my caffeine > this morning. :p > > Obviously any account with a zero balance should be worth zero in > any currency, so there is no need to even look at exchange rates > on zero balance accounts. I will take a look at the code. > > > I believe I've fixed this now. This seemed to be a bug that was > already hanging around, and the new Average Cost price source just > brought it to our attention. Could you try again with r17293? If it > works for you, then maybe there are some Bugzilla bugs that this might > resolve. :) That fixed it! Now it does what I expect.
> > > > -Charles > > > Dave > > > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
