Hello!
If I have already 2.1.4 installed, can I install 2.1.5 on top of it or
should I uninstall the old version first?
Wahur
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Dear Sirs and Madams,
About a week ago I installed gnucash 2.1.4. I t was working OK on a windows XP
system.
Yesterday I tried using it from a user account and it failed, it still works
from an admin account
Today I downloaded and installed gnucash 2.1.5. It opens OK using a admin
account, but s
This is an automated e-mail via the add-new-developer
script ($Revision: 1.7 $).
Developer account Jeff Green has been created: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Admins (root) should update CVS access for this user.
Welcome to the team.
--
(script run by root).
_
Welcome to svn.gnucash.org. You now have an account, jeff,
which you can use to access the SVN sources. You can now access
the sources by:
$ svn checkout svn+ssh://svn.gnucash.org/repo/gnucash/trunk src-trunk
[or maybe:
$ svn checkout svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/repo/gnucash/trunk src-trunk
As a GNOME translator, I can say translating documentation with PO
files is _much_ better than editing XML files.
I agree PO files are much more handy when translating user interface,
but editing XML files isn't any better. The translation tools (or
vim/emacs/etc. po-mode) allow us to focus on the
And it's ready. Sorry for the delay.
On 7/4/07, Nathan Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The windows binary should be ready tomorrow - I'm running a bit behind
> this time.
>
> Nathan
>
--
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Got Mole problems? Call Avogadro at 6
Christian Stimming a écrit :
> Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 16:16 schrieb Josh Sled:
>
>> Pierre-Antoine Lacaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I'm beginning the French translation of Gnucash's help, and have been
>>> suggested that it would be a good move to look into converting
>>> gnuc
Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Nigel Titley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Latest SVN, built under Ubuntu Feisty, after a make clean and into a new
>> install tree gives me
>>
>>
> Try "make maintainer-clean"? QOF-ID-BOOK-SCM is defined in
> src/engine/engine.i
> but I dont know when it was added. W
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 16:56 schrieb Derek Atkins:
> >> Following this way of thought I would decide for choice #1, leave
> >> as-is for 2.2.0. What do the other developers say?
> >
> > For better or for worse, we've conditioned users (me included) to
> > expect that they can 1) open GnuCash,
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 16:16 schrieb Josh Sled:
> Pierre-Antoine Lacaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm beginning the French translation of Gnucash's help, and have been
> > suggested that it would be a good move to look into converting
> > gnucash-help to gnome-doc-utils [1]. g-d-u is sup
Quoting Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I'm still waiting for someone to implement the GtkCombo +
>> GtkCompletion code that plugs generically into the QofQuery code.
>> If someone did that work I could plug it in relatively easily.
>> I just dont have the time to research how to and
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 10:56:06PM -0700, JT Justman wrote:
> Vahur Lokk wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
[...]
> > In a small business like mine amount of customers is not really very
> > big. I've got maybe 2-3 big ones plus bunch of smaller clients. The same
> > with vendors - I get bills from ISP, ph
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:58:38AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > JT Justman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Vahur Lokk wrote:
> >>> lease and thats it. In order to pick a vendor from my huge 4-vendor list
> >>> I have to use search. First, its bit of an
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:37:10AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> What's the definition of "primary split"? Is it the first split you
> >> create? Is it the first split tied to the account register? What
> >> about for transactions created
Speaking strictly as a user of GnuCash, I like the current auto-save as
implemented i.e. save-to-working-file; thanks, Christian!
I've never played around with a GnuCash file, decided I didn't like the
changes and closed without saving (but strangely enough, I do that with other
programs), but
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm, yeah, it looks like that URL should be more like:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=192&package_id=5582
Updated.
--
...jsled
http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpZJmmRWMyGI.pgp
Hmm, yeah, it looks like that URL should be more like:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=192&package_id=5582
-derek
Zoltan Levardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi,
>
> i have found the link has not working
> (http://download.sourceforge.net/gnucash). This link was coming f
Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> JT Justman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Vahur Lokk wrote:
>>> lease and thats it. In order to pick a vendor from my huge 4-vendor list
>>> I have to use search. First, its bit of an overkill and not very
>>> convenient. Second, there is not a way to see,
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
>> Following this way of thought I would decide for choice #1, leave
>> as-is for 2.2.0. What do the other developers say?
>
> For better or for worse, we've conditioned users (me included) to
> expect that they can 1) open GnuCash, 2) make unde
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What's the definition of "primary split"? Is it the first split you
>> create? Is it the first split tied to the account register? What
>> about for transactions created through other methods, like the transfer
>> dialog or an importer -- whi
"NEMMERS, BRENT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When will the 2.1.5 binary for windows be available? SourceForge only
> has the executable for 2.1.4.
Zoltan Levardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i have found the link has not working
> (http://download.sourceforge.net/gnucash). This link was comin
Pierre-Antoine Lacaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm beginning the French translation of Gnucash's help, and have been
> suggested that it would be a good move to look into converting
> gnucash-help to gnome-doc-utils [1]. g-d-u is supposedly the preferred
> way for documentation handling, and m
When will the 2.1.5 binary for windows be available? SourceForge only
has the executable for 2.1.4.
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
hi,
i have found the link has not working
(http://download.sourceforge.net/gnucash). This link was coming from the
http://www.gnucash.org/#070702-2-1-5.news feed. Where is the latest
windows setup file 2.15?
thx
z
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnuc
Hi,
I'm beginning the French translation of Gnucash's help, and have been
suggested that it would be a good move to look into converting
gnucash-help to gnome-doc-utils [1]. g-d-u is supposedly the preferred
way for documentation handling, and make use of po files.
I more or less ported it alread
JT Justman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Vahur Lokk wrote:
>> lease and thats it. In order to pick a vendor from my huge 4-vendor list
>> I have to use search. First, its bit of an overkill and not very
>> convenient. Second, there is not a way to see, who I actually have in my
[...]
> Hi, Vahur
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:44:46AM +0200, Christian Stimming wrote:
> 14:40:57 Hmm, are we going to have a 2.1.6?
> 16:21:25 warlord: wrt 2.1.6, if we plan not to revert the
> auto-save feature, we might want to have another test version iff
> christian wants to extend / improve it if
Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Following this way of thought I would decide for choice #1, leave
> as-is for 2.2.0. What do the other developers say?
I like option 3.
The implemented auto-save doesn't behave in the conventional way (with a
separate "checkpoint" file); it proba
> I'm just saying we developers have to find a decision
> which doesn't necessarily conform with the majority of feedback on our
> mailing lists. Neither we ourselves nor even the users of our mailing
> lists might correspond "the normal user" in a representative way.
Before you claim to m
14:40:57 Hmm, are we going to have a 2.1.6?
16:21:25 warlord: wrt 2.1.6, if we plan not to revert the
auto-save feature, we might want to have another test version iff
christian wants to extend / improve it if we just change the
default to disabled auto-save, then i am fine with no
30 matches
Mail list logo
