Re: r15098 - gnucash/trunk/src/gnome-utils - gnc_history_get_last() can return NULL.

2006-11-09 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 22:07 -0500, Per Bojsen wrote: > *** Regarding Re: r15098 - gnucash/trunk/src/gnome-utils - > gnc_history_get_last() can return NULL.; Derek Atkins > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> adds: > > Derek> free() still doesn't check, but g_free() does. > > Actually at least on Linux, a

Re: r15098 - gnucash/trunk/src/gnome-utils - gnc_history_get_last() can return NULL.

2006-11-09 Thread Per Bojsen
*** Regarding Re: r15098 - gnucash/trunk/src/gnome-utils - gnc_history_get_last() can return NULL.; Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> adds: Derek> free() still doesn't check, but g_free() does. Actually at least on Linux, according to man 3 free: If ptr is NULL, no operation is performe

Re: Receiving hundreds of copies of the same mail in this list

2006-11-09 Thread Derek Atkins
This is the first I've heard of it. Can you forward me (privately) a few of the mail headers from the duplicated emails? I'm fairly sure it's not our server but I would need to see some of the headers to verify. -derek Motin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry, I only got 250 of this particul

Re: no help files

2006-11-09 Thread David Hampton
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 13:20 -0500, Steve Holditch wrote: > I just installed from source 2.0.2 on Centos 4.4, but there seems to > be no help from the help/tutorial tab. I see a few other people > having the same trouble on the google. > > Just wondering if there is a fix. Check out and install t

no help files

2006-11-09 Thread Steve Holditch
I just installed from source 2.0.2 on Centos 4.4, but there seems to be no help from the help/tutorial tab. I see a few other people having the same trouble on the google. Just wondering if there is a fix. Steve ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-d

Receiving hundreds of copies of the same mail in this list

2006-11-09 Thread Motin
Sorry, I only got 250 of this particular mail, and around 1500 in total from gnucash devel list the last week. My mistake. Still, it is a tad too many... Where can I report this? Is this a known problem? /Fredrik Original Message Subject:About "Re: Updated DDL for SQL

About "Re: Updated DDL for SQL backend"

2006-11-09 Thread Motin
Any other than me that got 15.000 copies of this mail? I think 1 would be enough :S /Fredrik Derek Atkins wrote: > Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> There's a deeper modeling issue with SXes. We use a seperate, parallel >> AccountGroup to store template transaction data, in which A

Re: r15098 - gnucash/trunk/src/gnome-utils - gnc_history_get_last() can return NULL.

2006-11-09 Thread Derek Atkins
David Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 08:14 +0100, Andreas Köhler wrote: > >> g_free can handle NULL pointers just fine, now we are double-checking >> again. There is even a bug about these checks in gtk+: >> >> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369666 >> >> I

Re: r15094 - gnucash/branches/gda-dev - Initial commit of initial gda backend framework. See GDA_STATUS.

2006-11-09 Thread Derek Atkins
Herbert Thoma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't remember any more. But what did we do back at 1.2? 1.4? 1.6? > when we switched from binary fromat to xml? I don't think that > the new version was able to wirte the old binary format. > > This does not mean that we should do it the same way now.

Re: r15094 - gnucash/branches/gda-dev - Initial commit of initial gda backend framework. See GDA_STATUS.

2006-11-09 Thread Herbert Thoma
David Hampton wrote: > On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 10:12 +0100, Herbert Thoma wrote: > >> I don't remember any more. But what did we do back at 1.2? 1.4? 1.6? >> when we switched from binary fromat to xml? I don't think that >> the new version was able to wirte the old binary format. >> >> This does not

Re: r15098 - gnucash/trunk/src/gnome-utils - gnc_history_get_last() can return NULL.

2006-11-09 Thread David Hampton
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 08:14 +0100, Andreas Köhler wrote: > g_free can handle NULL pointers just fine, now we are double-checking > again. There is even a bug about these checks in gtk+: > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=369666 > > I do not suggest to fix all of them in the source, bu

Re: r15094 - gnucash/branches/gda-dev - Initial commit of initial gda backend framework. See GDA_STATUS.

2006-11-09 Thread David Hampton
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 10:12 +0100, Herbert Thoma wrote: > I don't remember any more. But what did we do back at 1.2? 1.4? 1.6? > when we switched from binary fromat to xml? I don't think that > the new version was able to wirte the old binary format. > > This does not mean that we should do it th

Re: r15102 - gnucash/trunk - Fix three incorrect tests for swig-wrapped objects and one

2006-11-09 Thread Andreas Köhler
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 09.11.2006, 09:27 -0500 schrieb Andreas Köhler: > Author: andi5 > Date: 2006-11-09 09:27:48 -0500 (Thu, 09 Nov 2006) > New Revision: 15102 > Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/15102 > > Modified: >gnucash/trunk/ >gnucash/trunk/src/business/business-reports/

Re: r15094 - gnucash/branches/gda-dev - Initial commit of initial gda backend framework. See GDA_STATUS.

2006-11-09 Thread Herbert Thoma
David Hampton wrote: > On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 17:22 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: <...> >> This is still an open question. There are multiple ways to consider >> handling this. One way is to do as you suggest; if you open an XML >> file it stays as an XML file, but if you create a new file it's SQLit