Any other than me that got 15.000 copies of this mail? I think 1 would be enough :S
/Fredrik Derek Atkins wrote: > Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> There's a deeper modeling issue with SXes. We use a seperate, parallel >> AccountGroup to store template transaction data, in which Accounts are >> named as the string representation of the SXes GUID, and contain >> Transactions with Splits which have their *real* Accounts, as well as >> the credit and debit cell text formulae, in KVP frames. >> > > I know David was working to re-model the AccountGroup... > > >> I don't see a reason to model this differently in the DB than in the >> object model. Though we might want to change the object model. >> >> >> Also, in the DDL, SXes still have an sx_id, though as QOF entities they >> are GUID-posessing objects, and thus should follow the pattern of those. >> > > How closely should the DB Schema map to the QOF object model? > > -derek > > _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
