Quoting Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Well, the fact that he doesn't control gnucash.org or any of the
>> servers that run gnucash infrastructure I think would be a major
>> impediment. Nothing would stop him from creating a fork, but I
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 05:39:31PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
> AFAIK, neither GnuCash documentation nor GnuCash developers
> have ever (publicly) claimed to be part of either Project, despite the
> fact that such relationships would seem natural to some.
Hmm. As the author of what I beleive
On Aug 11, 2006, at 1:13 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 05:16:32PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>> Hi Linas,
>> If we're talking about the same "standard" FSF assignment
>> form, it's designed to assign copyright of the entire existing
>> Work, not just future changes.
Am Mittwoch, 2. August 2006 20:13 schrieb David Hampton:
> Author: hampton
> Date: 2006-08-02 14:13:30 -0400 (Wed, 02 Aug 2006)
> New Revision: 14588
> Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/14588
>
> Modified:
>gnucash/trunk/src/import-export/import-backend.c
>gnucash/trunk/src/import
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 05:16:32PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Hi Linas,
> If we're talking about the same "standard" FSF assignment
> form, it's designed to assign copyright of the entire existing
> Work, not just future changes. That's why they require that the
> Assigner(s) be sole
Quoting Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:14:05AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>>>
>>> There is a Debian maintainer with an alpha machine who can install the
>>> gnucash build dependencies in a chroot on his
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, the fact that he doesn't control gnucash.org or any of the
> servers that run gnucash infrastructure I think would be a major
> impediment. Nothing would stop him from creating a fork, but I
> doubt anyone would follow there instead of using what
Here is a list of the differences between a successful Debian build of
gnucash for powerpc and for alpha. I have no idea which of these may
be significant, but perhaps one of them will produce an "aha! that
can't be right" from another developer.
The only thing that leaps out at me is that the a
Quoting Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I also don't think RMS could usurp the project as you suggest, though it
>> would be a annoying event.
>
> I think you must have misread my message. You don't think he could
> say "so-and-so is the new official GnuCash maintainer" and produce a
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:32:27PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:14:05AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >>
> >> There is a Debian maintainer with an alpha machine who can install the
> >> gnucash build depende
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:14:05AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>>
>> There is a Debian maintainer with an alpha machine who can install the
>> gnucash build dependencies in a chroot on his machine. Since gnucash
>> fails utterly on alpha (with
Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It seems to me that this is a case where it is wise not to declare war
>> and wise not to declare marriage. War helps nobody, and marriage has
>> its risks too.
>
> I don't think it's constructive to frame the discussion this way.
I don't see why; if you
Forwarded at Josh's request.
--- Begin Message ---
[lists.gnucash.org and I are not on speaking terms at the moment; can
you forward my personal delivery of this message to you to gnucash-devel
on my behalf, please?]
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 19:49 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> It seems to me
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:14:05AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> There is a Debian maintainer with an alpha machine who can install the
> gnucash build dependencies in a chroot on his machine. Since gnucash
> fails utterly on alpha (with a crash as soon as a register is opened)
> this see
Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am Fri, 11 Aug 2006
11:15:17 +0200:
> As for the logo, someone with access to the
> source of the gnucash_logo1.png should replace the text accordingly
> and upload it.
Maybe the new logo could at the same time also be added to
http://www.gnucash.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Bushnell BSG schrieb:
> Let's just make the website modifications because this will help us
> maintain peace. If RMS makes a truly unreasonable demand in the
> future, we can address that then. But the current request poses no
> real problems,
There is a Debian maintainer with an alpha machine who can install the
gnucash build dependencies in a chroot on his machine. Since gnucash
fails utterly on alpha (with a crash as soon as a register is opened)
this seems worth investigating. I don't have time in the near future.
Is there a deve
17 matches
Mail list logo
