> Peter O'Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This issue is specific to debian libtool. If Ganesan installs a more recent
> version of gnu libtool from ftp.gnu.org he'll not have a problem. Since, for
> an actual release, the libtool used is the one on the release manager's
> system, I think
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 07:38:13PM -0500, David Hampton wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 18:24 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > Ok, I think I've talked myself into this conclusion: Any application
> > > initialization state that gets pulled from g
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 18:24 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Ok, I think I've talked myself into this conclusion: Any application
> > initialization state that gets pulled from guile and used everywhere
> > else shouldn't be kept in gnucash-bin. Inst
Quoting Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ok, I think I've talked myself into this conclusion: Any application
initialization state that gets pulled from guile and used everywhere
else shouldn't be kept in gnucash-bin. Instead, gnucash-bin can call
into libcore-utils and it can be stored the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Shoemaker wrote:
| On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:46:59PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
|
|>Sorry to be replying to my own mail!
|>
|>
|>>I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|>
|>>You should be able to able to count on this magic as long as
|>>_LIBAD
[ In the process of writing this (rather LONG) email asking for
advice, I think I've discovered an answer, but I'm sending anyway in
case it generates some discussion. ]
Sorry I couldn't think of a better Subject: but I'm having a mental
block on large-scale program structure.
I'll illustrate my
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 09:46:59PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
>
> Sorry to be replying to my own mail!
>
> > I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You should be able to able to count on this magic as long as
> > _LIBADD variable is properly set. So why did this break for me,
> > even after
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had been ignoring that warning for quite a long time now, but after
> seeing the backtrace in the logs, it's quite obvious what's causing
> them. gnc:config-file-format-version doesn't exist anymore. That
> raises an interesting point...
Hmm, I wo
For the record, I think this is fine. Hopefully Linas will reply.
-derek
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://gnucash.neil.williamsleesmill.me.uk/ has been updated (it redirects to
> en/ by default now) and should be almost complete.
>
> All that's left now is working out where n
Ganesan Rajagopal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> OK. The embedded code will still come in handy in certain areas.
>
> Sorry if I am a bit dense today, what's this "embedded code"?
Embedded QOF.. Has nothing to do with GnuCash. (Note: Whenever
reading Neil's email, think "QOF" first).
>>> But
Sorry to be replying to my own mail!
> I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You should be able to able to count on this magic as long as
> _LIBADD variable is properly set. So why did this break for me,
> even after I did a "make distclean"? *scratches head*.
> I'll dig deeper and see if debian l
> Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Applied. Thanks.
Hmm, the patch should not be required. More below.
> Now I'm curious. What did you do to notice this?
I just did an "svn update" and then rebuilt the source tree. I even did a
distclean, ran configure again but that didn'
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 02:23:40PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
>
> I need the following patch to get the test programs to link correctly.
>
> ===
> --- src/gnome-utils/test/Makefile.am(revision 12909)
> +++ src/gnome-utils/te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tor Harald Thorland wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Can someone please advice me what to do, and what this sanity check is?
|
| I'm trying to build the latest revision from svn on a newly installed
| Ubuntu system.
|
| checking dependency style of g++... none
| chec
Can you please post your gzip'd config.log?
Also, you can look into that file yourself. The abort message of the
configure check can be found at approx. 2/3 into the file. I'd guess
either you have bad configure flags in your environment variables (like
CPPFLAGS=-Werror, see my post earlier th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Can someone please advice me what to do, and what this sanity check is?
I'm trying to build the latest revision from svn on a newly installed
Ubuntu system.
checking dependency style of g++... none
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... /li
I need the following patch to get the test programs to link correctly.
===
--- src/gnome-utils/test/Makefile.am(revision 12909)
+++ src/gnome-utils/test/Makefile.am(working copy)
@@ -46,11 +46,13 @@
test_gnc_recurrence_SOURC
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Certainly in the short term, yes. I am still hoping to implement the kind of
> process that an "ordered" collection of objects may require. Such a method
> has uses beyond the sqlite backend for gnucash.
>> I think we really need something more
18 matches
Mail list logo
