On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 12:01:56AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Thursday 21 July 2005 11:09 pm, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > David wants to put a '*' in the window title when the book is dirty.
> > No problem, query all the collections' dirty flag. Now, say we wanted
> > to extend the HIG usage
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:22:39PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Thursday 21 July 2005 10:04 pm, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > If by "incremental storage system" you mean something that commits
> > only what has changed, then we're on the same page.
>
> Yes.
>
> > (Incidentally,
> > even "immedi
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 00:14 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Thursday 21 July 2005 11:55 pm, David Hampton wrote:
> > Neil mentioned he will be modifying the code to use the new function
> > qof_instance_set_dirty() to set dirty flags on collections. If this
> > function also sets the dirty flag o
On Thursday 21 July 2005 11:55 pm, David Hampton wrote:
> Neil mentioned he will be modifying the code to use the new function
> qof_instance_set_dirty() to set dirty flags on collections. If this
> function also sets the dirty flag on the book containing the collection
> then I have almost every
On Thursday 21 July 2005 11:09 pm, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> David wants to put a '*' in the window title when the book is dirty.
> No problem, query all the collections' dirty flag. Now, say we wanted
> to extend the HIG usage to the sub windows.
>
> We want an account window's title to have '*' i
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 18:09 -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> David wants to put a '*' in the window title when the book is dirty.
> No problem, query all the collections' dirty flag. Now, say we wanted
> to extend the HIG usage to the sub windows.
There are no sub-windows in g2. There are only
On Thursday 21 July 2005 10:04 pm, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> If by "incremental storage system" you mean something that commits
> only what has changed, then we're on the same page.
Yes.
> (Incidentally,
> even "immediate-commit" systems sometimes fallback to "delayed-commit"
> systems when they'
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 08:13:22PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Thursday 21 July 2005 12:57 am, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > Ok, this was my point. I completely understand that you can get a
> > very quick boolean answer to the question "has anything in the book
> > changed?" by checking each co
On Thursday 21 July 2005 9:59 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Personally, I'd like to see the most amount of code reuse
> without code copying. Yes, QOF is external and eventually
> we should just use that. But I do NOT believe that we should
> rip out the core gnucash objects into their own source tre
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 08:13:22PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Thursday 21 July 2005 12:57 am, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > Ok, this was my point. I completely understand that you can get a
> > very quick boolean answer to the question "has anything in the book
> > changed?" by checking each co
I think there's a disconnect.. You're talking about packaging.
Josh is talking about source code. You're both right. :)
Personally, I'd like to see the most amount of code reuse
without code copying. Yes, QOF is external and eventually
we should just use that. But I do NOT believe that we sho
On Thursday 21 July 2005 3:11 pm, Josh Sled wrote:
> > The dependencies would sort out the rest, gnucash-common would be a
> > dependency of both, along with QOF. Installing either would draw in
> > gnucash-common and QOF anyway. The other dependencies (Gtk+ etc.) would
> > be gnucash-only.
>
> gnu
On Thursday 21 July 2005 12:57 am, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Ok, this was my point. I completely understand that you can get a
> very quick boolean answer to the question "has anything in the book
> changed?" by checking each collection's dirty flag. But think about
> *how* you'd have to create a
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 20:41 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 July 2005 6:19 pm, Josh Sled wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 17:25 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > Whilst CashUtil is presently a separate tree, I have an eye on the
> > > changes that would be required to fold it into Gnu
Dear Pawan,
you didn't say which version of gnucash you used, but I guess you are
talking about a 1.8.x-Version. The point is that the 1.8.x series is
still gtk1-based, which can be a problem for non-ascii character sets.
In that case, you need to make sure manually that your encoding of the
On July 21, 2005 04:21 am, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker schrieb:
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:28:14PM -0400, Phil Longstaff wrote:
>
> Thanks, Phil, for your better patch about the GNOME2_PATH -- obviously I
> hadn't thought this through. So your change should be used.
>
> >>When I
Dear list,
i am working on gnucash translation to nepali language
when i test the gnucash with the translation string shows with boxes
and no devanagari character shows up... i am using hoary ubuntu linux
please advice what went wrong
thanks in advance
pawan
Chris Shoemaker schrieb:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:28:14PM -0400, Phil Longstaff wrote:
Thanks, Phil, for your better patch about the GNOME2_PATH -- obviously I
hadn't thought this through. So your change should be used.
When I run autogen.sh, I get a number of warnings about underquoted
18 matches
Mail list logo
