Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 02 November 2004 9:27 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> I've just built 1-8 and your patch is required but it DOES fix the problem.
>
> After patching business-ledger/Makefile.am, a make install wasn't sufficient -
> it needed a make clean in busin
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 11:01:32 -0200, Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, okay, so then the definition should mention something about "per
> period"? I do not like this wording... suggestions? The problem with
> the current definition is that it could be interpreted to mean the total
> de
On Tuesday 02 November 2004 9:27 pm, Derek Atkins wrote:
I've just built 1-8 and your patch is required but it DOES fix the problem.
After patching business-ledger/Makefile.am, a make install wasn't sufficient -
it needed a make clean in business/business-ledger/ and a make install in
src/.
Ho
I will point out that it's VERY likely that HEAD is broken. I don't
use it regularly, and it's very possible that someone made some
changes that broke it.
You're welcome to keep it on-list for now; it will probably get
ignored in bugzilla for a while.
-derek
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
On Tuesday 02 November 2004 4:23 pm, you wrote:
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The upcoming release is based on the 1.8 branch, not HEAD. Can you
> test it in the 1.8 branch?
I haven't got 1.8branch on my system yet, I'll download and make it tonight.
> > (Works fine in 1.8.9)
>
>
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The terminal window showed:
>
> /usr/bin/guile: relocation
> error: /opt/gnucash/HEAD/lib/gnucash/libgnc-business-ledger.so.0: undefined
> symbol: gnc_option_db_lookup_taxtable_option
>
> Is this a makefile problem?
Could be. Or it could be some othe
I created a new file with Common Accounts and Business examples selected. I
created a test Customer and a test Job fine. I cannot create an invoice -
when the customer is selected and the job is selected, clicking OK causes
GnuCash to crash instead of showing the invoice window.
gdb didn't give
David Harrison wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:30:46 -0300, Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I think it is better to be accurate/complex than simple/wrong.
So, I changed the definition to your "...expensing capital purchases
over time...".
Just nit-picking, but shouldn't it be "Depreciatio
