On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:39:28 -0300, Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Ok, I know this comment will bite me when I run for president in
> > 20 years, but I flip-flop! :)
> >
> > Honestly, tho, I was mostly joking. But it does sound like we want
> > somewhat sepa
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:30:46 -0300, Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, I think it is better to be accurate/complex than simple/wrong.
> So, I changed the definition to your "...expensing capital purchases
> over time...".
Just nit-picking, but shouldn't it be "Depreciation is the ac
Derek Atkins wrote:
Ok, I know this comment will bite me when I run for president in
20 years, but I flip-flop! :)
Honestly, tho, I was mostly joking. But it does sound like we want
somewhat separate text for personal vs. business in this area.
Perhaps we need separate sections/chapters for
David Harrison wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:59:29 -0300, Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Basic Concepts:
http://www.gnucash.org/docs/v1.8/C/gnucash-guide/dep_concepts1.html
1) I added the first sentence definition "Depreciation is the account
method for tracking the decreasing value of an as
Jon
Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uh, Derek, you are joking, right? This issue was brought up in the
> beginning of this thread by David. But, I'll put the links in again.
>
> http://www.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-devel/2003-August/009760.html
> http://www.gnucash.org/pipermail/gn
Derek Atkins wrote:
David Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The way that we have made the distinction between personal and
business makes this a difficult definition. On the personal side,
your definition is correct. On the business side it's not.
Perhaps we need two different concepts guids,
David Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The way that we have made the distinction between personal and
> business makes this a difficult definition. On the personal side,
> your definition is correct. On the business side it's not.
Perhaps we need two different concepts guids, one for perso
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:59:29 -0300, Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David, good stuff.
>
> I updated the web pages with the new text, plus some modifications I
> made, take a look and let me know what you think. You may need to
> reload the pages to clear you cache to see the changes (I h
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 29 October 2004 3:48 pm, you wrote:
>> While I'm not against this, I'm concerned that it will add more code
>> to gnucash that may not be used much. Perhaps it will. I don't know.
>> But I'd like to make as few changes to the "gnucash xml dat
On Friday 29 October 2004 5:15 pm, Josh Sled wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 04:48, Neil Williams wrote:
> > The main difference is that I would like to use the XML for data
> > interchange between QOF applications and to make the format more like a
> > simple bag than a tree:
>
> "bag vs. tree" isn
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 04:48, Neil Williams wrote:
> The main difference is that I would like to use the XML for data interchange
> between QOF applications and to make the format more like a simple bag than a
> tree:
"bag vs. tree" isn't really the problem, is it?
What's wrong with your palm
On Friday 29 October 2004 3:48 pm, you wrote:
> While I'm not against this, I'm concerned that it will add more code
> to gnucash that may not be used much. Perhaps it will. I don't know.
> But I'd like to make as few changes to the "gnucash xml data file
> format" as possible.
It's more of a fo
Oaf is not a direct dependency, it's an indirect dependency. Gnucash does
not use it, but GtkHtml does (and it's possible that guppi does, too).
But Gnucash doesn't use it directly. Bonobo is similar -- an indirect
dependency, pulled in by the rest of the gnome libraries that we use.
-derek
Neil
On Friday 29 October 2004 3:36 pm, you wrote:
> I'm wondering if we should look at bonobo as the interface between
> different QOF applications? This would give us both online and
> offline data interchange. I just dont know how much work it would be,
> as I know next to nothing about bonobo.
We
Neil,
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I started on this Palm->Invoice saga, the use of an XML interchange file
> format was discussed. After looking at the current format, I am having to
> discount the hierarchy based on AccountGroup because it cannot be easily
> written by no
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I fully intend to have online communication, in both directions, it's just
> that offline is easiest to create first.
> :-)
*nods*
>> > 2. Pilot-link can query the GnuCash data file directly using QOF and a
>> > similar map.
>>
>> Please do not assume
David Harrison wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:51:16 -0700, David Harrison
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let me do a rewrite and get back to you.
Here is the other page on depreciation schemes
David, good stuff.
I updated the web pages with the new text, plus some modifications I
made, take a look and
On Friday 29 October 2004 1:10 pm, you wrote:
> Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Possible methods:
> > 1. GnuCash can query the pilot-link data directly using an offline XML
> > QofBook storage and a map.
>
> No chance for online communication?
Every chance, given time.
:-)
From late
When I started on this Palm->Invoice saga, the use of an XML interchange file
format was discussed. After looking at the current format, I am having to
discount the hierarchy based on AccountGroup because it cannot be easily
written by non-GnuCash applications - which may not have any explicit o
19 matches
Mail list logo
