On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:39:28 -0300, Jon Lapham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Derek Atkins wrote: > > Ok, I know this comment will bite me when I run for president in > > 20 years, but.... I flip-flop! :) > > > > Honestly, tho, I was mostly joking. But it does sound like we want > > somewhat separate text for personal vs. business in this area. > > Perhaps we need separate sections/chapters for the contentious > > areas? > > Yes. I TOTALLY agree that the docs would be better if split. In fact, > I still stand by my original proposal. Even the duplicated parts could > be somewhat written specifically for either personal finance or business > (the examples, for example). > > I just would not want to go down that road unless I knew I had 100% > support of others. It would be a lot of work, and the last thing I > would want is for another flip-flop to mean that you do not like the > idea Derek! > > I also would not want to start splitting the guide unless it was clear > that the project was actually progressing, especially for some of the > most requested business features such as end of year book closing (lots) > and a real payroll system. But, it seems to me that development has > sort of died off. No offense to anyone intended, maybe I am completely > wrong on this... just my impression.
I second Jon's feelings (am I signing myself up for more work by saying that ;>) Splitting the guide would be a good idea, and, IMHO, book closing and payroll are must haves if you are serious about getting into the small business category. Just my 2 cents Dave _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
