Ariel Rios writes:
>
>
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> > I'm sure this has been discussed a zillion times but I'd like to bring it up again:
> >
> > Requiring that all high-level Gnucash code be in Scheme might be
> > restricting the number of developers able to contribute
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2001 22:06:08 -0800, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dan> Ariel Rios wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Dan Kegel wrote:
>>
>> > I'm sure this has been discussed a zillion times but I'd like to
>> > bring it up again:
>> >
>> > Requiring that all high-level Gnucash
> Because there are very few people who know how to program in Scheme
> compared to the number of people who know how to program in C, C++, Java, or Perl.
Basically your argument is: "Scheme is bad for there are not many
programmers". However you forget that Scheme is easier than C,
C++, Java, Pe
Ariel Rios wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> > I'm sure this has been discussed a zillion times but I'd like to bring it up again:
> >
> > Requiring that all high-level Gnucash code be in Scheme might be
> > restricting the number of developers able to contribute to it.
> Why?
On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I'm sure this has been discussed a zillion times but I'd like to bring it up again:
>
> Requiring that all high-level Gnucash code be in Scheme might be
> restricting the number of developers able to contribute to it.
Why?
> Here's a few quotes from th
I'm sure this has been discussed a zillion times but I'd like to bring it up again:
Requiring that all high-level Gnucash code be in Scheme might be
restricting the number of developers able to contribute to it.
Here's a few quotes from the web in support of that theory
(found by searching for
Hey grib, I'm almost to the point of doing useful things
with panes (finally). One of the final things that needs
to be in place is a renderer along the lines of the
gnc:html-*foo*-render that are required to display guppi
charts in reports.
However, I'm not exactly clear on how these are suppo
Christopher Browne writes:
> This is with a CVS checkout from last night of the latest and greatest.
>
> This is admittedly one of those pathological cases where the "dumb user"
> has _nothing to save_, so that trying to save the DB is a mite silly.
>
> Crashing is nonetheless an irritating resu
Christopher Browne writes:
> This is with a CVS checkout from last night of the latest and greatest.
>
> This is admittedly one of those pathological cases where the "dumb user"
> has _nothing to save_, so that trying to save the DB is a mite silly.
>
> Crashing is nonetheless an irritatin
This is with a CVS checkout from last night of the latest and greatest.
This is admittedly one of those pathological cases where the "dumb user"
has _nothing to save_, so that trying to save the DB is a mite silly.
Crashing is nonetheless an irritating result.
Note that in "SQL land," the prope
10 matches
Mail list logo
