On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, Dan Kegel wrote: > I'm sure this has been discussed a zillion times but I'd like to bring it up again: > > Requiring that all high-level Gnucash code be in Scheme might be > restricting the number of developers able to contribute to it. Why? > Here's a few quotes from the web in support of that theory > (found by searching for "scheme learning curve"): I don't see why quoting some web posts can be a good reason. ariel _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnumatic.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
- scripting language vs. developer community size Dan Kegel
- Re: scripting language vs. developer community size Ariel Rios
- Re: scripting language vs. developer community si... Dan Kegel
- Re: scripting language vs. developer communit... Ariel Rios
- Re: scripting language vs. developer communit... James LewisMoss
- Re: scripting language vs. developer comm... Dan Kegel
- Re: scripting language vs. developer... Al Snell
- Re: scripting language vs. devel... Dan Kegel
- Re: scripting language vs. devel... Bill Gribble
- Re: scripting language vs. d... Rob Browning
- Re: scripting language vs. d... Eugene Tyurin