On 27-Dec-2000, Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > OK. So the question I have is "So what?" HTTP is slower than a UDP
> > > protocol because it's TCP (that's the basic gist of this right?). So
> > > what? Is it too slow for our uses? N
Hi Derek,
I tried to build gnucash-1.4.9, ad noticed it seemed to want guile 1.3.4
(libguile.so.6) and that you ad managed to build a rpm for stock,
unmdified redhat 6.2 that didn't have this requirement (and listed
only libguile.so.4). What's the secret?
--linas
___
> It is unclear that the security server and the engine need to be on
> the same machine; so long as the security server is associated with
> the datastore, it should suffice. E.g., if you don't have access to
> data, you wont be able to retreive it from the datastore in the first
> place. From
David Merrill writes:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 04:34:00PM -0800, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> > David Merrill writes:
> > > In light of the discussions we have been having over whether the
> > > account group mechanism should be strictly hierarchical or whether an
> > > account should be allowed to ex
David Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > OK. So the question I have is "So what?" HTTP is slower than a UDP
> > protocol because it's TCP (that's the basic gist of this right?). So
> > what? Is it too slow for our uses? No one knows because it hasn't
> > been tested. My bet: nope not a
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 11:55:11AM -0500, James LewisMoss wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Dec 2000 19:25:03 + (GMT), "Al B. Snell"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Al> I would suggest making good use of RPC over UDP - the connection
> Al> should start off with UDP, and only make TCP connections wh
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2000 19:25:03 + (GMT), "Al B. Snell"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Al> On Fri, 22 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > You're missing the point - HTTP is slow! It doesn't load the
>> > server, it's just slow!
>>
>> Its not slower than rpc, corba, ftp, nfs or sendmail
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 10:13:58AM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> It is unclear that the security server and the engine need to be on
> the same machine; so long as the security server is associated with
> the datastore, it should suffice. E.g., if you don't have access to
> data, you wont be able
It is unclear that the security server and the engine need to be on
the same machine; so long as the security server is associated with
the datastore, it should suffice. E.g., if you don't have access to
data, you wont be able to retreive it from the datastore in the first
place. From a security
Hello friends!
I just translated the GnuCash program texts to spanish and want to
share it with you.
Find attached the es.po file and the translated es.mo
My platform is Debian 2.2 GnuCash which is Version 1.3.4
All strings (where it seemed apropiate) are translated, when I did not
know what w
Derek Atkins writes:
> David Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > From *my* perspective (me, the database, that is), it is all based on
> > the user_name under which you are logged on. The database doesn't know
> > anything else on which it can base things. So the calling layer has to
> > trans
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 04:51:44PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Of course, we still need to have libgnc_engine talk to an sql
> database, and still need to slove the caching problems, and a bunch
> of other issues. But I think a cheapo demo could be done really
> quick (a few days/weeks) by
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 05:24:54PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's been rumoured that Peter C. Norton said:
> >
> > Interesting, I haven't looked at libgnc_engine. Have you, in turn, looked
> > at the gda library being developed for gnome-db?
>
> Sort-of. libgda was one of the contributi
--
rijweoprjwoiejrpoiwej
Robert Merkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"We are excited and optimistic about its usage going
forward and, yes, we can teach penguins the military
close-order drill", Mark Norton, US Depa
14 matches
Mail list logo
